6 August 1981 Death of James Parkes, Campaigner against Antisemitism and Re-visioner of Jewish-Christian Relations #otdimjh

Screen Shot 2015-08-05 at 19.56.01

“Imagine…if one can, a man who –– decades before the Holocaust and long before the full effects of mixing with Jews were felt –– grasped the extent of the historic acts of injustice of Christians toward Jewry and determined to atone for them by ending them. Imagine how, in his incredible capacity for empathy, he was able to penetrate through layers and layers of denigration and centuries of hardening the heart in order to feel the Jews’ pain and victimization. Imagine the power of discovery that enabled him to internalize the message and fate of Judaism as well as the intellectual daring that enabled him to apply these insights to the reformulation of the classic Christian faith in which he was so deeply rooted. This is the man –– Ecce Homo –– James Parkes.” [Irving Greenberg]

Screen Shot 2015-08-06 at 07.50.01

William W. Simpson wrote in this obituary:

Those for whom Nostra Aetate, the conciliar declaration on the relationship of the Church to non-Christian religions, marks the beginning, or perhaps an early stage in their interest in Jewish-Christian relations, will do well to give thanks for the work of James Parkes whose life ebbed peacefully to its close on the evening of 6 August.

Born in Guernsey in December 1896, he received a classical education at St Elizabeth’s College, an education in “life in the raw” during a period of military service as a Brigade Gas Officer in France (which nearly cost him his life), and a theological education at Oxford in the immediate post-war period. He was ordained in 1925 shortly after becoming a Student Christian Movement secretary. It was during a period of service in the international student field that he first encountered the Jewish problem not as an acactemic, but very much an existential issue.

41Z3MY67KXL._SX325_BO1,204,203,200_

His concern at what he saw and vicariously experienced of discrimination against Jewish students prompted him to search for the underlying causes of these contemporary manifestations of antiJewish feeling. His researches led to the conclusion summarised in his first book on the subject, The Jew and his Neighbour (1930) that: “. . . the origin of anti-Semitism lies, unconsciously and unintentionally, in the interpretation of the Old Testament current in the early Church, and in the picture of the Jews as a rebellious people who had crucified the Messiah and still refused to believe in him, which was continuously repeated from the Christian pulpits.”

mKLB6EeYE5ma1aaip8M_NQA

That was for James the heart of the matter as it was also to become the starting point for his life’s work. He began to lay plans for a five-volume history of antiSemitism of which the first volume, The Conflict between the Church and the Synagogue (1934) earned him an Oxford doctorate in philosophy, a reputation for sound scholarship, and together with his already widely-known activities in the student world in combating anti-Semitism, a place in the Nazi “black-list.” He left Geneva which had been the centre of his work among students and settled in a small Elizabethan manor at Barley, near Cambridge, which very soon became a centre of attraction for Jewish and Christian scholars and teachers from this country and overseas. There he built-up a valuable library on the whole field, historical and contemporary, of Jewish-Christian relations. This was incorporated in 1956, and on his retirement in 1963, transferred to Southampton University as a permanent collection in the University Library, where also there was established a Parkes Research Fellowship. During the years of his retirement at Iwerne Minster in Dorset, his home and his person continued to attract visitors and correspondence from all parts of the world.

410dVjzYi7L

In 1938 the second volume of the projected five appeared under the title of The Jew in the Medieval Community, but that was the end of the “history” in that particular form. Thereafter there appeared a spate of books dealing, some in depth and some for more general consumption, with every aspect of the Jewish problem in the modern world, a problem now highlighted by the tragedy of the Nazi holocaust and further complicated by the situation in the Middle East and the emergence of the State of Israel, on which the quintessence of his views found expression in a small but pregnant volume entitled The Five Roots of Israel.

il_570xN.705084706_eadi

But James Parkes was not only a historian. He was also something of a theologian. In 1940 under the pseudonym of John Hadham (the reasons for his choice of which are delightfully and characteristically recorded on page 158 of his autobiography: Voyage of Discoveries), he published Good God as a Penguin Special. This, together with a companion volume in the same series, God in a World at War, found an enthusiastic readership among men in the forces whose religious foundations, not very securely laid, were being badly shaken by their war-time experiences. They were also devastatingly reviewed by James Brodrick in a brilliant article on “Penguin Theology” in The Tablet of 26 April 1941. I could only wish that the two might have met and compared notes, for James in his “theological” role was, as I always felt, essentially a poser of searching questions rather than a proposer of superficial answers!

Much more serious in the religious sphere, and thought by many to be his most important contribution to the development of a fundamentally sound understanding between Christians and Jews is The Foundations of Judaism and Christianity (1961). Again, though of a very different order from the John Hadham books, it is a question-probing rather than a solution-propounding enquiry into the implications of the continuing existence in parallel of the two faiths. Each he argued is valid in its own right, each has its own mission to fulfil, and yet neither can complete its task apart from its relationship with the other.

imagesparkes

His theological speculations, however, took him further afield than his consideration of the contemporary relations between Judaism and Christianity. “The concern to relate what we really believe with what we say in church dates back to my childhood” he wrote in this autobiography, and in later life he came to regard Humanism as a channel of divine revelation along with Judaism and Christianity. This led him to a “doctrine” of the Trinity which put him at variance with the mainstream of theological orthodoxy and led many to write him off theologically, at least as lightweight. It remains to be seen, however, whether in the long run the stimulus of his heterodoxy may not have some contribution to make to the clarification of some Of our more orthodox dilemmas.

james_parkes_5

It is, however, as a historian of the origins, development and contemporary ramifications of anti-Semitism that he will be long remembered by all who are concerned with the eradication of that deeprooted evil. It was in recognition of this that in 1949 he was elected to the presidency of the Jewish Historical Society of England, and that he became the recipient of other honours and awards in the later years of his life, including the BuberRosenzweig Medal awarded annually by the German Coordinating Council of Organisations for Jewish-Christian Cooperation.

51rYiQJ9xcL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_

Those who were fortunate enough to know him personally will remember him also as a man of many talents. No mean artist with pencil and pastel in his early years, he also developed a remarkable skill in embroidery, until Dupuytrens contraction robbed his fingers of the ability to ply his needle. This somewhat unusual talent offered for him at least a far more satisfying outlet than the doodling in which so many of us indulge while others talk in committees and otherwhere. Connoisseur and collector of lovely things, he was also a great garden lover, and a skilled gardener himself; a delightful raconteur and a charming host. In all this as well as in his major activities he was greatly helped by his wife porothy (Wickings) whom he married in 1942, by whom he is survived, and to whom in so many ways he owed so much.

41Bd4o4yprL._UY250_

Reflection: It is not exaggeration to say that Parkes revolutionized Jewish-Christian relationships, and the narrative paradigm of early Judaism and Christianity. While his work has undergone critical scrutiny and has now been revise by others, and he was in no way sympathetic to Jewish believers in Yeshua, we are in debt to him for his profound scholarship, deep sensitivity to the sins of the past, and his love of the Jewish people. May we have courage and wisdom to build on his work. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

Screen Shot 2015-08-05 at 20.04.26

http://www.think-israel.org/chertok.jamesparkes.html

http://www.notredamedesion.org/en/dialogue_docs.php?a=3b&id=459

http://www.southampton.ac.uk/parkes/about/jamesparkes.page

“The real lesson from the conduct of the persecutors is that a society has a positive task to safeguard and maintain decency and humanity, and to recognize the evils that destroy them” Reverend Dr James Parkes, Founder of The Parkes Institute

IN MEMORIAM – JAMES PARKES 1896-1981

  1. ROY ECKARDT

Parkes read in five languages; his books have been translated into seven. His other major works in his primary subject include

The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue: A Study in the Origins of Antisemitism (Meridian Books, Jewish Publication Society, 1961 [1934]);

End of An Exile: Israel, the Jews and the Gentile World (Vallentine, Mitchell, 1954);

The Foundations of Judaism and Christianity (Quadrangle, 1960);

A History of the Jewish People (Quadrangle, 1963)) Antisemitism (Quadrangle, 1964); and

Whose Land? A History of the Peoples of Palestine (Taplinger, 1971).

Much of his writing involved him in the case for, and the meaning of, a Jewish state. He become deeply involved in the question of Zionism and the Zionist cause.

In an address to the London Society of Jews and Christians, Parkes observed that the hatred and denigration of Jews and Judaism

“have a quite clear and precise historical origin. They arise from Christian preaching and teaching from the time of the bitter controversies of the first century in which the two religions separated from each other. From that time up to today there has been an unbroken line which culminates in the massacre . . . of six million Jews. The fact that the action of Hitler and his henchmen was not really motivated by Christian sentiments, the fact that mingled with the ashes of murdered Jews are the ashes of German soldiers who refused to obey orders when they found out what those orders were, the fact that churches protested and that Christians risked their lives to save Jews — all these facts come into the picture, but unhappily they do not invalidate the basic statement that antisemitism from the first century to the twentieth is a Christian creation and a Christian responsibility, whatever secondary causes may come into the picture.”

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

4 August 1947 10 Points of Seelisberg realigns Christian-Jewish relations #otdimjh

4b1d2-7f457b7acc

Still reeling from the shock, terror and trauma of the Holocaust, Christians began the painful but much needed task of re-visioning their historic relationship with the Jewish people, renouncing the ‘teaching of contempt’ and recognising the disastrous effects of supersessionism.

330px-Picswiss_UR-28-26

In the summer of 1947, 65 Jews and Christians from 19 countries gathered in Seelisberg, Switzerland. They came together to express their profound grief over the Holocaust, their determination to combat antisemitism, and their desire to foster stronger relationships between Jews and Christians. They denounced antisemitism both as a sin against God and humanity and as a danger to modern civilization. And to address these vital concerns, they issued a call in the form of 10 points to Christian churches to reform and renew their understandings of Judaism and the relationships between Judaism and Christianity.

The Seelisberg Conference (International Conference of Christians and Jews) was an international conference that took place in the small town of Seelisberg in Switzerland from 30 July to 5 August 1947 in order to study the causes of Christian antisemitism.

398px-Seelisberg_1001

Among the 70 participants from 17 countries were:

28 Jews, including Jules Isaac, Jacob Kaplan, acting chief rabbi of France, Alexandre Safran, chief rabbi of Romania, the writer Josué Jéhouda, of Geneva; Professor Selig Brodetsky, president of the Representative Council of the Jews of England.

isaac

Jules Isaac

23 Protestants,9 Catholics, including Père Marie-Benoît, Father Calliste Lopinot, Abbot Charles Journet, Father Jean de Menasce, Father Paul Démann.

At the time of this conference, the Christians undertook a re-examination of Christian teaching with regards to the Jews and Judaism. They measured the extent of Christian responsibility in the Nazi genocide and understood that Christian teaching had to be urgently corrected. They prepared ten points, largely inspired by the eighteen proposals of the historian Jules Isaac to eradicate prejudices against the Jews.

International Council of Christians and Jews

The 10 Points of Seelisburg, 1947

The following statement, produced by the Christian participants at the Second conference of the newly formed International Council of Christians and Jews, was one of the first statements following World War II in which Christians, with the advice and counsel of Jews, began to come to terms with the implications of the Shoa.

AN ADDRESS TO THE CHURCHES

SEELISBERG (Switzerland), 1947

We have recently witnessed an outburst of antisemitism which has led to the persecution and extermination of millions of Jews. In spite of the catastrophe which has overtaken both the persecuted and the persecutors, and which has revealed the extent of the Jewish problem in all its alarming gravity and urgency, antisemitism has lost none of its force, but threatens to extend to other regions, to poison the minds of Christians and to involve humanity more and more in a grave guilt with disastrous consequences.

The Christian Churches have indeed always affirmed the un-Christian character of antisemitism, as of all forms of racial hatred, but this has not sufficed to prevent the manifestation among Christians, in various forms, of an undiscriminating racial hatred of the Jews as a people.

This would have been impossible if all Christians had been true to the teaching of Jesus Christ on the mercy of God and love of one”s neighbour. But this faithfulness should also involve clear-sighted willingness to avoid any presentation and conception of the Christian message which would support antisemitism under whatever form. We must recognise, unfortunately, that this vigilant willingness has often been lacking.

We therefore address ourselves to the Churches to draw their attention to this alarming situation. We have the firm hope that they will be concerned to show their members how to prevent any animosity towards the Jews which might arise from false, inadequate or mistaken presentations or conceptions of the teaching and preaching of the Christian doctrine, and how on the other hand to promote brotherly love towards the sorely-tried people of the old covenant.

Nothing would seem more calculated to contribute to this happy result than the following

TEN POINTS

  1. Remember that One God speaks to us all through the Old and the New Testaments.
  2. Remember that Jesus was born of a Jewish mother of the seed of David and the people of Israel, and that His everlasting love and forgiveness embraces His own people and the whole world.
  3. Remember that the first disciples, the apostles and the first martyrs were Jews.
  4. Remember that the fundamental commandment of Christianity, to love God and one’s neighbour, proclaimed already in the Old Testament and confirmed by Jesus, is binding upon both Christians and Jews in all human relationships, without any exception .
  5. Avoid distorting or misrepresenting biblical or post-biblical Judaism with the object of extolling Christianity.
  6. Avoid using the word Jews in the exclusive sense of the enemies of Jesus, and the words “the enemies of Jesus” to designate the whole Jewish people.
  7. Avoid presenting the Passion in such a way as to bring the odium of the killing of Jesus upon all Jews or upon Jews alone. It was only a section of the Jews in Jerusalem who demanded the death of Jesus, and the Christian message has always been that it was the sins of mankind which were exemplified by those Jews and the sins in which all n en share that brought Christ to the Cross.
  8. Avoid referring to the scriptural curses, or the cry of a raging mob: “His blood be upon us and our children,” without remembering that this cry should not count against the infinitely more weighty words of our Lord: “Father forgive them for they know not what they do.”
  9. Avoid promoting the superstitious notion that the Jewish people are reprobate, accursed, reserved for a destiny of suffering.
  10. Avoid speaking of the Jews as if the first members of the Church had not been Jews.

 

Prayer and reflections: Such statements seem obvious today, but then were radical in their recognition of the need to redress the wrong thoughts and actions of the past. Yet even today there is still much work to be done for Christians and Jews to have a right understanding of the ‘indissoluble bond’ between them, and Messianic Jews have a significant role to play in promoting mutual understanding and bringing them together. Lord, help us to serve you, your Church and your World, Israel and the nations, in ways that honour you and glorify your name. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

 

http://www.iccj.org/fileadmin/ICCJ/user_upload/Copeland/TwelvePoints.PDF

http://www.jcrelations.net/An_Address_to_the_Churches__Seelisberg__Switzerland__1947.2370.0.html?id=720&L=3&searchText=An+Address+to+the+Churches&searchFilter=%2A

http://www.jcrelations.net/An_Address_to_the_Churches__Seelisberg__Switzerland__1947.2370.0.html?id=960

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seelisberg_Conference#cite_note-1

https://friendsofsion.wordpress.com/2014/08/05/the-10-points-of-seelisburg-and-the-antisemitism-inside-the-church/

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

4 August 1808 Joseph Frey founds forerunner of CMJ #otdimjh

Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 19.47.59

Ever the entrepreneur who covered his traces by moving on and founding new organizations, this first attempt by Joseph Frey [see here for biography and writings] to form a Mission to Jews would morph into the longer-lasting London Society for the Promotion of Christianity Among the Jews.

500px-joseph_samuel_fray-1

The first society folded. CMJ continues, in various regenerations, to today.

Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 19.46.40

Gidney reports: Consequently, on August 4th, 1808, at Artillery Street Chapel in the East End, a small and unpretending association, consisting of a few influential men, was formed under the title of

“The London Society for the purpose of visiting and relieving the sick and distressed, and instructing the ignorant, especially such as are of the Jewish nation,”

with Mr. Frey as President. The benefits offered appear to have been of a spiritual and temporal character, operations amongst the Jews being undoubtedly the most prominent, though not the exclusive, objects of the Society. Religious publications, calculated to remove Jewish prejudices and objections to Christianity, were issued, and lectures given to Jews in Bury Street.

Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 19.46.52

A very short experience sufficed to demonstrate that a wrong beginning had been made. The union of Gentile and Jewish work proved to be impracticable, and well-nigh impossible. History had repeated itself.

Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 19.47.01

The Apostolic arrangement, that some should go to ” the Circumcision,” and others to “the Uncircumcision,” was found to be the best even in the nineteenth century. And so it was deemed expedient to remodel the Society, and, in fact, to make a new start.

Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 19.47.14

This was all the more necessary as the formation of this Society had called forth a protest from ” The Missionary Society,” as being an invasion of their field. The new Society, however, held its ground.

Screen Shot 2015-08-03 at 19.47.23

The Committee, persuaded of “the declining state of the Jewish affairs under the Missionary Society, arising as they conceive from the multiplicity of the objects,” and from the fact that the members were ” either professedly, or by reputation. Dissenters,” resolved on February 15th, 1809, “That in future this Society shall be denominated the London Society for the Promotion of Christianity amongst the Jews,” subsequently modified into “for Promoting Christianity amongst the Jews.”

The title is indeed a lengthy one, and has often been felt to be unwieldy, although it exactly formulates the objects of the Society, as being for the extension and diffusion of Christianity amongst this ancient people, and not the conversion of the entire race — a consummation not to be expected during this dispensation.

It is doubtful, h0wever, if the founders restricted the title to this sense. For, whilst noting that there were “not less than thirty converted Jews and Jewesses in His Majesty’s Dominions,” they added, “these we consider as the earnest of that great harvest of Israel which the prophets have predicted.” And they asked, referring to Missions to the Heathen, “Should not similar efforts be made that all Israel may be saved ? ”

It was, however, fully recognized that the duty of supporting Missions to the Jews was altogether a thing apart from the necessity of holding any special views on prophecy.*

Reflection and Prayer: Looking back 200 years to the history of the early days of CMJ it is wondrous to see how such a small beginning could have led to such a significant impact. Supporters of Jewish evangelism, Christian Zionism, Messianic Judaism, the infrastructure and institutions in the State of Israel, the growing awareness among Christians of the ongoing purposes of God for the Jewish people, can all trace their origins to small groups such as were involved in Frey’s early attempt to found an organisation. Not without great human weaknesses, such attempts did not seem likely to succeed, yet along continue until today. Unless the Lord builds the house, those who labour, labour in vain. Amen 

8 May 1799 Baptism of Joseph Frey, founder of London Society for Promoting Christianity amongst the Jews #otdimjh

https://jewinthepew.org/2015/04/14/14-aprl-1820-joseph-frey-founds-american-society-for-meliorating-the-condition-of-the-jews-otdimjh/

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Joseph-Samuel-C-F-Frey/222847314537253?fref=ts

https://jewinthepew.org/2015/04/14/14-aprl-1820-joseph-frey-founds-american-society-for-meliorating-the-condition-of-the-jews-otdimjh/?preview_id=2035

https://archive.org/details/essaysonchrist00frey

https://archive.org/details/essaysonchrist00frey

Hebrew Grammar 1813

http://ia600308.us.archive.org/31/items/shaarharishonell00freyrich/shaarharishonell00freyrich.pdf

Essays on Baptism 1829

http://archive.org/details/essaysonchrist00frey

The theological lectures of Rev. David Bogue, never before published, Volume 1 (Google eBook)http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_theological_lectures_of_Rev_David_Bo.html?id=ewFMAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y David Bogue, Joseph Samuel Christian Frederick Frey L. Colby, 1849 – Theology, Doctrinal – 806 pages

General search

http://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Frey%2C+Joseph+Samuel+C.+F.+%28Joseph+Samuel+Christian+Frederick%29%2C+1771-1850%22

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Samuel_C._F._Frey

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

3 August 1833 Second Reading of Jewish Relief Act (Disabilities Bill) #otdimjh

2659232305 (1)

This bill was introduced to remove any obstacles to Jewish people in the United Kingdom having full civil rights and allow them to become members of Parliament. . A similar bill was passed in 1829 to remove restrictions on Roman Catholics. It went through several readings and met with difficulties throughout. Eventually it was passed in 1858.

imagesaug3

The Jews Relief Act 1858, also called the Jewish Disabilities Bill, is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which removed previous barrier to Jews entering Parliament.

Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_(1837-1952).svg

Following the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829 there had been an unsuccessful attempt in 1830 to also allow Jews to sit in Parliament. The 1858 measure was the result of a long process which began with a bill introduced by the Whig leader Lord John Russell following the election of Lionel de Rothschild to the City of London constituency in 1847. Rothschild could not take the seat without taking the Christian oath. The bill was supported by the future Conservative Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli but not by his party.

jewish-oath1

In 1848, the bill was approved by the House of Commons but was twice rejected by the House of Lords as was a new bill in 1851. In the 1852 general election, Rothschild was again elected but the next year the bill was again defeated in the upper house. Finally, in 1858, the House of Lords agreed to a proposal to allow each house to decide its own oath.

309279638

Caricature of Baron Rothschild, by Carlo Pellegrini. (Photo by Wikimedia Commons/Jewish Museum)

The bill allowed …any Person professing the Jewish Religion, [to] omit the Words “and I make this Declaration upon the true Faith of a Christian”… in their oaths, but explicitly did not extend to allowing Jews to various high offices, and also stated that …it shall not be lawful for any Person professing the Jewish Religion, directly or indirectly, to advise Her Majesty…touching or concerning…any office or preferment in the Church of England or in the Church of Scotland.

Amendments in 1871, 1922, 1973, 1980 and 1986 removed all restrictions on Jews holding office except that they may not advise certain government officials on matters related to appointments in the Church of England or the Church of Scotland.

 

Prayer and reflection. It is not surprising that for almost 600 years Jewish people in the UK felt discrimated against, since the time of their expulsion in 1290. May we never be those who discriminate against others, either through our prejudices or through legal means. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews_Relief_Act_1858

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews_Relief_Act_1858

JEWISH CIVIL DISABILITIES BILL.

HC Deb 03 August 1836 vol 35 cc865-74865

  • The Chancellor of the Exchequer moved that this Bill be now read a second time.
  • Sir Robert Inglis

At last, Sir, we are called upon to discuss this measure, and in a House which, if any Member chose to exercise his undoubted right, might easily be counted out—a House consisting, perhaps, of thirty-five Members (I will not press the objection, because after so long a postponement I wish to take the ques- 866tion on its merits), but it is in such a House that a measure which I and many who think with me consider will have a vital influence on the Christian character of this Christian Legislature, is to be decided. The Bill now before us has been upon the Orders of the House almost as long as the famous Pension Duties’ Bill—fifty-five days; sufficiently long at least to tire the patience of any man not actuated by a strict sense of duty. I know, at least, that I speak from my own experience, and I believe that of many of my friends, when I say, that duty alone has brought us clown to this House week after week, in expectation of this measure coming on. Is not the plain reason this—that a measure in itself bad can only be perpetrated—I use no harsher term, by a mode still worse? By the mode of effecting the object of this Bill we shall, in my opinion, be unchristianizing ourselves. Let it always be remembered that we are not legislating for New Zealand or Nova Zembla, or any newly established colony. We are legislating for a state of society in which the supreme power has, and long has been, vested in certain bodies, under certain long established conditions and restrictions. It is not therefore that you are called upon,a priori, to enact the conditions on which the legislative power shall be exercised. You are called upon to admit the Jews, by omitting that emphatic declaration which every one of you have made at that Table; that we, entering upon our legislative functions, will discharge them “upon the true faith of a Christian.” This I contend makes an essential difference between an Act by which in any other country, or above all in a newly erected State, the Jews would be admitted into civil power, and an Act, such as that now under consideration, by which we renounce for ourselves and for them, that solemn covenant which at the Table of this House we make with our country and our God, to perform our duties as Legislators “upon the true faith of a Christian.” I know that among those who support this measure there are many (none more than my right hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer) who cannot without reluctance and pain, reflect that they are about to take such means of effecting such an object; not to introduce, but to erase words; and about to enact, that they will not in future discharge their legislative duties “upon 867the true faith of a Christian,” for that is the real point at issue; that is the only mode in which the object of this Bill can be effected; I am certain they must feel regret in reflecting upon this. I am certain their real sentiments, if expressed, would be such as these, “We are truly sorry to be compelled to take this course; but it is the only mode by which our object can be effected: a public measure is to be carried; it cannot be carried but by this means; we are grieved thus to throw into the dust our common Christianity; but the Jew will not be contented without; contented he must be; therefore annihilated must be that solemn declaration of the Christianity of the Members of this House. I have, however, rather anticipated the order in which I should have discussed this question. I should first have said, that my objection was absolutely to the admission of Jews into this House; whatever might be the mode in which it was done, and independently of my objection to the means by which this Bill proposes to effect the object; but which, in such a country as this, and with such a body of legislation as lies upon that Table, is, I admit, the only method by which it could be effected. I strongly, and unconditionally, protest against the introduction of the Jews into Parliament at all. I believe that the Jews, by their own testimony, and by the testimony of all antiquity, may be considered—no one will deny it—as an entirely distinct and separate nation. I repeat, it is not that which we (when I say “we” I mean every Christian community in Europe)—it is not what we say, it is not what their opponents say (that might be considered as a relic of barbarism),—it is the language of the Jews themselves, that they are a distinct people. No one, I believe, will venture to contradict the evidence which I shall bring in confirmation of this statement; not from writers six, seven, or eight centuries old (for they might be deemed influenced by the barbarous prejudices of past ages), but from modern writers of their own nation. Before I go farther let me say that I have never, in discussing this question (and I have been called to discuss it often), I have never, so far as I can recollect, suffered myself to speak of the Jews with disrespect. I have stated what I believe to be the fact, that, notwithstanding the vulgar prejudice against the Jews, their 868moral character, taking numbers for numbers, will bear comparison with that of any other people. I have never rested my opposition to their claims upon any popular antipathies, never availed myself of any prejudice against their character; let me add, that as a nation I regard them as a standing miracle, and as such I speak of them not merely with respect but with awe. The question now is, whether they regard themselves as a nation, not merely separated from us at present, but for ever impossible to be united to us. I believe they do thus regard themselves; and more than that, let it be considered they are as a nation, necessarily, essentially, opposed to that which we regard as our greatest privilege, our highest blessing, our brightest distinction;—they are necessarily, and on principle, hostile to that which we regard as the crown of all our glory (or if we do not so regard it we are not entitled to style ourselves Christians)—our common Christianity.

Sir, I say, that the distinction of the Jews consists not merely in their creed: they are a nation; their creed and nationality are one and the same, and that this is their own belief I shall now proceed to show. A few years ago, a letter was addressed to my right hon. Friend, then Secretary of State for the Home Department. It was a published letter,—from Mr. Hart to Sir Robert Peel—and the writer thus expresses himself: “I feel myself called upon, as a member of an ancient and oppressed people.” The House will see, the Jews do not claim relief as the Roman Catholics, or as the Protestant Dissenters claim it—as fellow-subjects differing in religious belief; but they appeal to us as a distinct people; they give us at once to see that they believe themselves to be a nation; and so instinctive, I might almost say, is this conviction, even in the minds of hon. Members opposite, that in a discussion upon the Marriage Bill, on the 13th June, the hon. and learned civilian, the Member for the Tower Hamlets (Dr. Lushington), used these very words: “If a Jew marry agreeably to the usages of his own nation.” I bring this example forward, to show that, in the opinion even of the friends of the Jews, of hon. Gentlemen opposite, they not only hold a distinct creed, but are a distinct people. If so, what more reason have we to give them civil power in this country, than to 869naturalise so many Russians or Prussians?—Again, this nation, if true to themselves, and to their own prophetical destiny, can never be identified with us. Upon a former occasion, I quoted some opinions of a Gentleman (whose name was then, I believe, indistinctly heard in the House) from whom I have since received a letter, a passage of it I will read to the House. I allude to the Rabbi Crool. He refers to the prophetic destiny of the Jews, a subject far too high for discussion in this House, but to which, on such a question, I think it not unfitting to make a passing allusion; and after alluding to their present condition, he continues thus: “Suppose a King of England to condemn a person to be transported for a time known only to the King, the person was transported, and an order sent with him to the governor, informing him of the duration of the sentence. In process of time, the governor set free the prisoner. He went further, he made him a citizen: he went still further, he promoted him to a high station in life. The conduct of the governor was reported to the King. Let hon. Gentlemen who support this Bill pass sentence, whether the governor will be found guilty of breaking the command of his King.” No one can be so ignorant, Sir, of his own country’s history, and the history of the Jews, as not to perceive the events to which these allusions refer. None can require to be informed, that the governor receiving the transported person, is the supreme governor of this country, and that the person transported, signifies the banished, “scattered and peeled,” rejected of all nations—the Jews. We believe the Jews to be sentenced to this separation from all nations, for causes with which every man who reads his Bible must be well acquainted; and we are called upon, not merely to set them free, but to make them citizens; and still further, to give them civil power over a Christian Church, and enable them to exercise the duties of Legislators over this Christian nation. I might produce many other passages from the writings of Jews; all concur in the same opinion. To admit the Jews into civil power, and to confer on them the right to legislate for this country, would be inevitably to place them in a situation in which their interests as a nation, would be inconsistent with the interests of the people of this country. To give only one instance;870Members of this House are often called upon to legislate with respect to the Established Church of this realm, and is it fitting that men, not only strangers to us as a nation, but strangers to us in that which constitutes our peculiar glory, our Christianity, should legislate upon such a subject. I stated upon a former occasion, I do not believe that the great body of the religious Jews in this country participate in the anxiety entertained upon this subject by the political Jews. The answer then was, “wait for petitions;” and certainly my right hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, did present, soon after, sundry petitions in favour of the measure. But I believe it will be found, that the priests of the Jews do not join in these petitions; and that they feel it inconsistent with their peculiar situation, to mix themselves up with the temporal affairs of another nation. And the Rabbi Crool uses this language: “I will now turn to my brethren, the Jews, and I say to them, ‘suppose that the Bill is passed, and that you are equal in every respect,’ you will then say, ‘London is our Jerusalem, England is our land of Canaan; we have no need now of another Jerusalem, no need of another Canaan!'” It may be said, indeed, “that is their own affair, let them look to that.” But I contend, that to effect a temporal object, you have no right to place them in such a predicament, and to tempt them, for temporal advantage, to neglect that which they feel to be their spiritual privilege. In the present state of the House, whatever I might feel inclined to say, it would be useless now. It is quite evident that the subject does not excite that interest which so great a change in the institutions of the country ought to excite. I consider it as a measure which, without producing the benefits which my right hon. Friend anticipates, will be followed by more serious consequences than he imagines. I impute no motives—I appeal to him with the perfect confidence, that however widely we may differ on questions of public policy, we agree on that which is vastly superior to the most weighty of earthly considerations. I am sure he must feel reluctance in expunging from the declarations which the Members of this House take, those emphatic words, by which they solemnly profess their Christianity, and their accountability to the God of the Christians, for the care which they shall take over his 871 Church and his people in this land. With these feelings, Sir, I move as an amendment, “That this Bill be read a second time this day six months.”

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

2 August 1492 Columbus delays departure from Spain #otdimjh

Screen Shot 2015-08-01 at 21.11.44

“Christopher Columbus was originally going to sail on August 2, 1492, a day that happened to coincide with the Jewish holiday of Tisha B’Av, marking the destruction of the First and Second Holy Temples of Jerusalem. He postponed this original sail date by one day to avoid embarking on the holiday, which would have been considered by Jews to be an unlucky day to set sail. (Coincidentally or significantly, the day he set forth was the very day that Jews were, by law, given the choice of converting, leaving Spain, or being killed.)

IND112775 Christopher Columbus at the gates of the monastery of Santa Maria de la Rabida with his son Diego, giving bread and water, 1858 (oil on canvas) by Mercade y Fabregas, Benito (1821-97) oil on canvas Prado, Madrid, Spain Index Spanish, out of copyright

IND112775 Christopher Columbus at the gates of the monastery of Santa Maria de la Rabida with his son Diego, giving bread and water, 1858 (oil on canvas) by Mercade y Fabregas, Benito (1821-97)
oil on canvas
Prado, Madrid, Spain
Index
Spanish, out of copyright

“Everybody knows the story of Columbus, right? He was an Italian explorer from Genoa who set sail in 1492 to enrich the Spanish monarchs with gold and spices from the orient. Not quite.

For too long, scholars have ignored Columbus’ grand passion: the quest to liberate Jerusalem from the Muslims.

During Columbus’ lifetime, Jews became the target of fanatical religious persecution. On March 31, 1492, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella proclaimed that all Jews were to be expelled from Spain. The edict especially targeted the 800,000 Jews who had never converted, and gave them four months to pack up and get out.

columbusships

The Jews who were forced to renounce Judaism and embrace Catholicism were known as “Conversos,” or converts. There were also those who feigned conversion, practicing Catholicism outwardly while covertly practicing Judaism, the so-called “Marranos,” or swine.

Tens of thousands of Marranos were tortured by the Spanish Inquisition. They were pressured to offer names of friends and family members, who were ultimately paraded in front of crowds, tied to stakes and burned alive. Their land and personal possessions were then divvied up by the church and crown.

800px-Emanuel_Gottlieb_Leutze_-_Columbus_Before_the_Queen

Columbus before the Queen, as imagined by Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze, 1843

Recently, a number of Spanish scholars, such as Jose Erugo, Celso Garcia de la Riega, Otero Sanchez and Nicholas Dias Perez, have concluded that Columbus was a Marrano, whose survival depended upon the suppression of all evidence of his Jewish background in face of the brutal, systematic ethnic cleansing.

Columbus, who was known in Spain as Cristóbal Colón and didn’t speak Italian, signed his last will and testament on May 19, 1506, and made five curious — and revealing — provisions.

ColombusMap

“Columbus map”, drawn c. 1490 in the Lisbon workshop of Bartolomeo and Christopher Columbus

Two of his wishes — tithe one-tenth of his income to the poor and provide an anonymous dowry for poor girls — are part of Jewish customs. He also decreed to give money to a Jew who lived at the entrance of the Lisbon Jewish Quarter.

On those documents, Columbus used a triangular signature of dots and letters that resembled inscriptions found on gravestones of Jewish cemeteries in Spain. He ordered his heirs to use the signature in perpetuity.

According to British historian Cecil Roth’s “The History of the Marranos,” the anagram was a cryptic substitute for the Kaddish, a prayer recited in the synagogue by mourners after the death of a close relative. Thus, Columbus’ subterfuge allowed his sons to say Kaddish for their crypto-Jewish father when he died. Finally, Columbus left money to support the crusade he hoped his successors would take up to liberate the Holy Land.

images2

Estelle Irizarry, a linguistics professor at Georgetown University, has analyzed the language and syntax of hundreds of handwritten letters, diaries and documents of Columbus and concluded that the explorer’s primary written and spoken language was Castilian Spanish. Irizarry explains that 15th-century Castilian Spanish was the “Yiddish” of Spanish Jewry, known as “Ladino.” At the top left-hand corner of all but one of the 13 letters written by Columbus to his son Diego contained the handwritten Hebrew letters bet-hei, meaning b’ezrat Hashem (with God’s help). Observant Jews have for centuries customarily added this blessing to their letters. No letters to outsiders bear this mark, and the one letter to Diego in which this was omitted was one meant for King Ferdinand.

In Simon Weisenthal’s book, “Sails of Hope,” he argues that Columbus’ voyage was motivated by a desire to find a safe haven for the Jews in light of their expulsion from Spain. Likewise, Carol Delaney, a cultural anthropologist at Stanford University, concludes that Columbus was a deeply religious man whose purpose was to sail to Asia to obtain gold in order to finance a crusade to take back Jerusalem and rebuild the Jews’ holy Temple.

In Columbus’ day, Jews widely believed that Jerusalem had to be liberated and the Temple rebuilt for the Messiah to come.

Scholars point to the date on which Columbus set sail as further evidence of his true motives. He was originally going to sail on August 2, 1492, a day that happened to coincide with the Jewish holiday of Tisha B’Av, marking the destruction of the First and Second Holy Temples of Jerusalem. Columbus postponed this original sail date by one day to avoid embarking on the holiday, which would have been considered by Jews to be an unlucky day to set sail. (Coincidentally or significantly, the day he set forth was the very day that Jews were, by law, given the choice of converting, leaving Spain, or being killed.)

Columbus’ voyage was not, as is commonly believed, funded by the deep pockets of Queen Isabella, but rather by two Jewish Conversos and another prominent Jew. Louis de Santangel and Gabriel Sanchez advanced an interest free loan of 17,000 ducats from their own pockets to help pay for the voyage, as did Don Isaac Abrabanel, rabbi and Jewish statesman.

Indeed, the first two letters Columbus sent back from his journey were not to Ferdinand and Isabella, but to Santangel and Sanchez, thanking them for their support and telling them what he had found.

The evidence seem to bear out a far more complicated picture of the man for whom our nation now celebrates a national holiday and has named its capital.

As we witness bloodshed the world over in the name of religious freedom, it is valuable to take another look at the man who sailed the seas in search of such freedoms — landing in a place that would eventually come to hold such an ideal at its very core.”

Reflection: We can not be sure of Columbus’ Jewish ancestry, but it is highly likely that this was a factor in his decision. As history shows, 1492 was a watershed year for the history of the world, and for the Jewish people. May God give us wisdom to know the times and seasons of our lives, and the part He calls each one of us to play. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/20/opinion/garcia-columbus-jewish/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Columbus

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

1 August 1567 Birth of Christian ben Meir Biberbach Gerson #otdimjh

g-Gerson titels. Book 1659-Erfurt-antijüd. font-in-museum-e1419064979680

Gerson, Christian ben Meir Biberbach, born at Reeklichhausen, August 1, 1567, received the usual Talmudical education, and was a teacher in several places. [ Bernstein: Some Jewish Witnesses ]

Screen Shot 2015-08-01 at 08:28:50

A neighbour, who was a Christian woman, borrowed from him ten pence, giving him as security a Lutheran New Testament. Curious to know the source of the Christian errors, he and his two brothers-in-law read it with much amusement. Yet finding there quotations from the Old Testament, he continued reading it more earnestly, comparing Scripture with Scripture, until his conscience was awakened and felt the need of salvation through Christ. He wrote afterwards—”I found such light, for which I have to thank the Lord God all my life.”

255px-Hbs_martinikirche

Martini Church of Halberstadt, where Gerson what baptized

He was baptized by Pastor Silberschlag at Halberstadt, October 19, 1600. Gerson’s son Stephen was baptized years later, but his wife got a divorce from him. He then taught Hebrew at Copenhagen, and eventually, after being persuaded by friends, he became a preacher of the Gospel. Testimony is given him that he heartily loved his people, and defended them against blood accusations.

His works are: “Des Jüdischer Talmud fürnehmster Inhalt und Widerlegung,” Gislav, 1707, Gera, 1613. A German translation of the eleventh chapter of Tract Sanhedrin. Gerson died on October 22, 1642, only 47 years old, as a preacher of the Gospel, in poverty. He was pastor of two parishes, receiving a stipend of six gulden, and had to work as a farm labourer for his living. In the Jewish Encyclopædia it is stated that Gerson was drowned at Roelheim, September 25, 1627. Here is [233] a specimen of the contradictory statements of historians.

Reflection: Gerson’s Life and Times were difficult, and his works display a justification of his new faith that takes on a polemical and adversarial stance against his fellow Jews and Judaism itself. Such a position which not uncommon, and is still present  today, as Jews who believe in Yeshua find it difficult to situate Themselves comfortably between the two religious communities that have viewed each other with so much distrust and mutual suspicion over the centuries.

Lord, give us a new generosity of spirit, sense of commitment to one another, and deeper understanding of your purposes of  with both  Church and Israel, so that we may accept of one another with the love Yeshua has for His People, His World and all creation. In his name we pray. Amen.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Gerson

  • Martin Friedrich: Between Defence and conversion. The position of the German Protestant theology to Judaism in the 17th century.  Tübingen 1988
  • Nathanja Hüttemeister : A Jewish family in the tense relationship between Judaism and Christianity, the Christian convert Gerson in conflict with his Jewish family.  In:  Vestische Journal , 99 (2002), pp 47-59.
  • Rotraud Ries: individualization in the tension to differing cultures: location measurement and experimental redefinitions in the Jewish minority.  In: Kaspar von Greyerz (Hg.):  Self-Narratives in the Early Modern Period: individualization ways in an interdisciplinary perspective. , Munich 2007, pp 79-112.
  • FA de le Roi: Christian Gerson, the first Protestant preacher from the converted Jews.  In:  Dibre Emeth or voices of truth to Israelites and friends of Israel , 35 (1879), pp 97-110 ( digitized ), pp 129-140 ( digitized ).

https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/entity/128789050

http://www.dorsten-lexikon.de/g/gerson-christian/

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

30 July 1492 Expulsion of the Jewish people from Spain #otdimjh

Screen Shot 2015-07-31 at 07.44.08

In the same month in which their Majesties [Ferdinand and Isabella] issued the edict that all Jews should be driven out of the kingdom and its territories, in the same month they gave me the order to undertake with sufficient men my expedition of discovery to the Indies.” So begins Christopher Columbus’s diary. The expulsion that Columbus refers to was so cataclysmic an event that ever since, the date 1492 has been almost as important in Jewish history as in American history. On July 30 of that year, the entire Jewish community, some 200,000 people, were expelled from Spain. [writes Jacob Telushkin: Jewish Virtual Library]

Screen Shot 2015-07-31 at 07.45.56

Tens of thousands of refugees died while trying to reach safety. In some instances, Spanish ship captains charged Jewish passengers exorbitant sums, then dumped them overboard in the middle of the ocean. In the last days before the expulsion, rumors spread throughout Spain that the fleeing refugees had swallowed gold and diamonds, and many Jews were knifed to death by brigands hoping to find treasures in their stomachs.

600px-Expulsion_judios-en.svg

The Jews’ expulsion had been the pet project of the Spanish Inquisition, headed by Father Tomas de Torquemada. Torquemada believed that as long as the Jews remained in Spain, they would influence the tens of thousands of recent Jewish converts to Christianity to continue practicing Judaism. Ferdinand and Isabella rejected Torquemada’s demand that the Jews be expelled until January 1492, when the Spanish Army defeated Muslim forces in Granada, thereby restoring the whole of Spain to Christian rule. With their most important project, the country’s unification, accomplished, the king and queen concluded that the Jews were expendable. On March 30, they issued the expulsion decree, the order to take effect in precisely four months. The short time span was a great boon to the rest of Spain, as the Jews were forced to liquidate their homes and businesses at absurdly low prices. Throughout those frantic months, Dominican priests actively encouraged Jews to convert to Christianity and thereby gain salvation both in this world and the next.

Alhambra_Decree

Edict of Expulsion

The most fortunate of the expelled Jews succeeded in escaping to Turkey. Sultan Bajazet welcomed them warmly. “How can you call Ferdinand of Aragon a wise king,” he was fond of asking, “the same Ferdinand who impoverished his own land and enriched ours?” Among the most unfortunate refugees were those who fled to neighboring Portugal. In 1496, King Manuel of Portugal concluded an agreement to marry Isabella, the daughter of Spain’s monarchs. As a condition of the marriage, the Spanish royal family insisted that Portugal expel her Jews. King Manuel agreed, although he was reluctant to lose his affluent and accomplished Jewish community.

download (17)

In the end, only eight Portuguese Jews were actually expelled; tens of thousands of others were forcibly converted to Christianity on pain of death. The chief rabbi, Simon Maimi, was one of those who refused to convert. He was kept buried in earth up to his neck for seven days until he died. In the final analysis, all of these events took place because of the relentless will of one man, Tomas de Torquemada.

images (40)

The Spanish Jews who ended up in Turkey, North Africa, Italy, and elsewhere throughout Europe and the Arab world, were known as Sephardim — Sefarad being the Hebrew name for Spain. After the expulsion, the Sephardim imposed an informal ban forbidding Jews from ever again living in Spain. Specifically because their earlier sojourn in that country had been so happy, the Jews regarded the expulsion as a terrible betrayal, and have remembered it ever since with particular bitterness. Of the dozens of expulsions directed against Jews throughout their history, the one from Spain remains the most infamous.

jhr-16-1-chalmers1-l

Prayer: Lord, how we lament the suffering of the Jewish people, the treatment of Jews and Jewish Christians by the Church and the Crown, and the expulsion of 1492. Yet we see your hand of Providence yet again scattering our people, sending them into the New World, and to places where they would be free to live, learn and let their lights shine. Only you know the times and seasons of our lives, both as individuals and as peoples. Lord, have mercy upon Israel and all nations. In Yeshua’s name, and for his glory, we pray. Amen.

http://www.naxos.com/mainsite/blurbs_reviews.asp?item_code=8.572443&catNum=572443&filetype=About%20this%20Recording&language=English

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrNhMKFDPuk

http://www.allmusic.com/album/endechar-lament-for-spain-mw0001998745

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

30 July 1709 Jonah ben Jacob Xeres affirms his faith in Yeshua #otdimjh

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 23.51.38

Xeres, Jonah ben Jacob, was a native of North Africa, where he came in contact with English Christian merchants and learned the truth as it is in Jesus from them. In 1707 he came to London and was instructed and baptized by Dr. Allix in 1709. He then wrote an “Address to the Jews,” containing his reasons for leaving the Jewish and embracing the Christian religion. (See Wolff Bib. Heb., 14, N. 823.) [Bernstein: Some Jewish Witnesses]

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 18.05.43

The book is dedicated to the then Archbishop of York (in 1709), and prefaced by an attestation to the respectability of the author by seven London merchants, and another by the learned Dr. Allix.

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 23.56.20

“We, whose names are underwritten, merchants trading into Barbary in Africa, do hereby certify, all whom it may concern, that we, each of us, having formerly lived for several years in those parts, did then, as we do now, personally know Jonah ben Jacob Xeres, who was born in Saphia, a sea-port town on that coast. His parents, being Hebrews, [526] were reputed to be honest and substantial people; who employed much care in educating this their son, Jonah, in the Jewish religion, and no less expense in instructing him in the Hebrew, Arabic, and Chaldean tongues.

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 17.59.38

He the said Jonah lived in that country a professed Jew, till the age of five and twenty, or thereabouts; and always behaved himself sober in his conversation, and no less just in his dealing, as some of us have experienced, having had occasion to employ him on several accounts, whereby, amongst other conversation, he had an opportunity of discoursing with some in our factory about matters of religion; and, as he now informs us, was thereby possessed with some notion, that the Messiah had already come; whereby, being uneasy under such a weighty doubt, he came over to England about eighteen months ago, in order to acquire a full satisfaction.

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 23.54.43

After some time here, he applied himself to some of us to recommend him to some learned Divine for information; whereupon he was sent to the Rev. Dr. Allix, on whom some of us have since waited, who, requesting of us a character of the said Jonah, is the occasion of this paper, which we do in all respects believe to be true, and have a very good opinion of the probity and sincerity of the above-mentioned Jonah; and that we trust upon his examination, he will prove to the judgment of the Most Reverend the Archbishops, the Right Reverend the Bishops, the Reverend the Clergy, and all other pious Christians, to whom we recommend him, [527] &c.

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 23.54.12

“Done at London, this eight and twentieth day of May, one thousand seven hundred and nine.

“Peter Fleuriot, Samuel Robinson, John Lodington, John Adams, Val. Norton, Robert Colmore, Thomas Coleman.”

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 23.53.51

“These are to certify, that upon several discourses had with the aforementioned Jonah ben Jacob Xeres, I have found him very well acquainted with the Holy Scriptures of the Old Testament, and all other Jewish and particularly Talmudical learning; so that he was very ready, upon the chief objections that Jews make to the doctrine, deity, and office of our Saviour. But, as he is endowed with very good natural and acquired parts, I was the more able to satisfy and convince him of the truth; so that, after having examined by Scripture all the most material controversies, he hath freely declared to myself, and his other friends, his desire to renounce the errors and prejudices of his education in the Jewish religion, and to embrace and profess the Christian faith.

Screen Shot 2015-07-29 at 23.55.53

“Witness my hand this 30th day of July, 1709.

“Peter Allix, D.D.”

Reflection: Reading the story of of Xeres one is struck by the out-of-the-blue nature of his life and experience. Few Jewish people lived in the UK, even fewer were believers in Yeshua, and at the beginning of the eighteenth century there was little understanding of the ongoing relationship between the Church and Israel. Yet suddenly appears this isolated yet fascinating account, against the backdrop of slowly changing attitudes to Jews and Judaism. Like Jesus-believing Jews throughout the centuries, Xeres’ life, faith and story go ever against the stream, and even today he is an example to us of that bitter-sweet combination of identities, theologies and personal experiences.

 

English version here

http://www.classicapologetics.com/x/xauthor.html

Latin version here (page 270ff)

http://books.googleusercontent.com/books/content?req=AKW5Qadk9gqsrXkQwYMow896dOwKxQPskPZrN6rL7OukUJlTh4EVk1fIkR4zhYPdWIoLCbjy_UuhKsZKAHNmfTPkPDfJfh3Ym3fuO2YULbiY2Y_diwEbiDNstnkc_zR4pDidEbgwKv8OFeSH33Q25h_HEGr68-K2GnbpOZjRK9kIXUKIr2p2yW7g-s75ln4KaI2gJUOd7ouSDC23qak4ylH_91DvwrdjW8SzqasSrbLOlLYG7DJtwiOxyOoK3x76pXflb8nK6vzB

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Allix

Born in 1641 in Alençon, France, he became a pastor first at Saint-Agobile Champagne, and then atCharenton, near Paris. The revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 compelled him to take refuge inLondon. There he set up a church in Jewin Street, Aldersgate.[1] He was the most celebrated Huguenot preacher of the 1680s in England, closely associated with Charles Le Cène, and known to advocatereligious toleration.[2]

In 1690 Allix was created Doctor of Divinity by Emmanuel College, Cambridge, and was given the treasurership and a canonry in Salisbury Cathedral by Bishop Gilbert Burnet.[1]

Allix discovered that Codex Ephraemi is a palimpsest. He died in London.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

29 July 2013 Right of Return to Portugal Five Centuries After Inquisition #otdimjh

Screen Shot 2015-07-28 at 22.12.46

The Portuguese government on Thursday 29 January 2015 approved modifications to a law that regulates nationality rights to the descendants of Sephardic Jews who were expelled from the Iberian nation five centuries ago, local media reported.

Jose-Ribeiro-e-Castro-at-the-Portuguese-parliament-e1373619144519-965x543

Jose Ribeiro e Castro, who spearheaded the law to naturalize the Jewish descendants of expelled Jews, speaking at the Portuguese parliament. (photo credit: Portugal’s National Assembly/JTA)

“I would not say that it is a historical reparation, because I believe that in this regard there is no possibility of repairing what has been done. I would say that it is the granting of a right,” Portuguese RPT news quoted Justice Minister Paula Teixeira da Cruz as saying at the conclusion of a cabinet meeting.

Portugal’s law on naturalizing descendants of Sephardic Jews was passed by parliament on July 29th 2013.

“We expect the law to be effective by mid-February or the beginning of March 2015,” said the president of Lisbon’s Jewish community Oulman Carp.

According to the legislation, “the government will give nationality … to Sephardic Jews of Portuguese ancestry who belong to a tradition of a Portuguese-descended Sephardic community, based on objective prerequisites proving a connection to Portugal through names, language and ancestry.”

Oulman Carp said it also will apply to non-Jewish descendants of Sephardim, Oulman Carp said.

Existing legislation on the naturalization of Sephardim has not been applied because it still does not contain regulations for bureaucrats, which may be published along with the final letter of the law.

John-III

King John III, who requested the inquisition in Portugal 

The authors described the legislation as an act of atonement for the expulsion of Portuguese Jewry in 1536 during the Portuguese Inquisition. Similar legislation is underway in Spain, where it awaits a final vote in Congress. Hundreds of thousands of Jews fled Iberia from 1492 on because of Church-led persecution.

Screen Shot 2015-07-28 at 22.18.09

In both countries, legislators and government officials said Jewish communities would be consulted and perhaps made partially in charge of screening applicants. The Jewish community of Lisbon, where the vast majority of Portugal’s 800 Jews live, has rejected applications because the final letter of the law has not yet been published, Oulman Carp said.

ShowImage

Reflection and Prayer: This symbolic gesture cannot begin to redress the injustices, persecution and destruction of life and property that took place hundreds of years ago, nor can original wrongs be righted by an apology. Yet it is an important gesture nevertheless, showing a real desire for reconciliation and restoration of relationships. As such it should be welcomed and affirmed, in the hope that others would follow such an example, and Jewish people feel welcome again in countries that so often persecuted and expelled them.

Oseh shalom b’imromav, hu ya’aseh shalom aleinu, v’al kol Yisrael, v’al kol hagoyim, v’imru Amen. May he who makes peace in the heavens also make peace among us and among all Israel and the nations, and say ye, Amen.

http://world.time.com/2013/09/04/jews-win-a-right-of-return-to-portugal-five-centuries-after-inqusition/

http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Portugal-okays-law-of-return-for-Sephardic-Jews-389431

http://www.timesofisrael.com/portugal-becomes-2nd-country-after-israel-with-a-jewish-law-of-return/

Jews Win a Right of Return to Portugal Five Centuries After Inquisition

By John Krich / Lisbon

In a remote Wales town, artist Judy Rodrigues sees a chance to complete a search for belonging traced through the ancient synagogues of London and Amsterdam. In Israel, retiree Sara Cassuto Sachs wonders if stumbling on her maiden name as a tourist in the Portuguese city of Tomar can lead to the convenience of an E.U. passport. In Istanbul, the Portuguese Consul has been flooded with calls from a long-standing Sephardic community nervous about the strengthening Islamist influence in Turkish politics and eager to reconnect with a country whose language still infuses their prayers.

Portugal may not be the land of the Second Coming. But it very well could become the second country of choice for some Jews seeking to live in an ancestral homeland. The July 29 promulgation of a new law grants automatic Portuguese nationality to descendants of the estimated 400,000 “judeus” expelled, killed or forced to convert during the dark days of the 16th century Inquisition. “For those who may keep the key to the house of their ancestors,” declares the bill’s co-sponsor and Socialist Party heavyweight Maria de Belem Roseira, “this law tells them their homeland is still there.”

Formally established in 1536, the Portuguese Inquisition saw show trials, executions, mass killings and the forced separation of children shipped off to Portugal’s colonies. While more Jews remained as “new Christians” in Portugal than in Spain, most fled to what is now modern day Morocco, Turkey, the Netherlands, and turned up in Venice’s ghetto as well as among the first European settlers of New York City. There are estimated to be only 600 Jews in Portugal today, not counting ex-pats, compared with some 400,000 at the time of the Inquisition.

Call it apology or reparation, the new act is “trying to erase a black mark on our nation, something terrible and unfair,” says Christian Democrat member of parliament Joao Rebelo. “Nothing else could win unanimous support from all parties. It’s making history in a good way.”

As with all high-minded impulses, the difficulty may be getting down to the details. (A similar ruling, announced with less public fanfare late last year by Spain’s Ministry of Justice, has become mired in controversy – slowed by long waits, onerous regulations like renouncing other citizenship and what Rebelo describes as “a large Muslim lobby we don’t have in Portugal.”) Despite the stirring rhetoric, Portuguese lawmakers admit it may take another year to establish procedures for implementing the edict and exact criteria for approval of applications. Between Inquistion records and synagogue membership here and overseas, many of the common names the exiled Portuguese Jews adapted can be traced and verified.

“The Rabbis of our three approved communities should have the say,” argues Jose Oulman Carp, President of Lisbon’s 300-member “Israelite” Community. “They would know best who are Jews, who has Iberian rather than Eastern European origins, though the problem comes when trying to determine if families originated here or in Spain.” Where many fled across borders and the majority hid their identity with “new Christian” names, M.P. Rebelo points out, “There were no Facebook pages back then to help us keep track.” And Lisbon’s current main Rabbi Eliezer Shai Di Martino insists, “Everything will of course be done in accord with civil authority,” adding, “While mostly symbolic, I hope this may eventually add life to our small community.”

In fact, the single-sentence amendment to Portugal’s code does not even specify that applicants have to be practicing Jews, know much about Portugal, have clean criminal records. They won’t even have to reside in the country to gain citizenship — a provision that proponents like Roseira, a staunch human rights advocate, cite to refute suspicions, as voiced by Rabbi di Martino and others, that managers of an economy in austerity may hold the “old idea that all Jews are rich.” As Roseira points out, “laws already exist to grant citizenship to those investing a half-million Euros. Our only motive was to reassert this country’s tradition of tolerance for the mixing of cultures and races.”

Still, admits Esther Mucznik, grand-daughter of a Lisbon Rabbi, “While celebrating, it’s hard not to feel some bitterness. It’s like the duck they killed before is laying the golden egg.”

More likely, the law’s enactment comes as the fruition of a four-decade resurgence of appreciation for Portugal’s Jewish past since the overthrow of staunchly Catholic, Nazi-sympathizing dictator Antonio Salazar. Anti-fascist heroes like Aristides Sousa Mendes, Portugal’s so-called “Schindler”, have been officially rehabilitated. Sephardic life, customs, even food have become common subjects for scholarship here and in Brazil, spurred in part by the popularity of The Last Kabbalist of Lisbon, a historical novel by American Richard Zimler, who has found success in Portugal through Jewish themes.

While Carp hopes the new law will lead to resumption of direct flights between Lisbon and Tel Aviv, that will be spurred by commercial initiatives like the Rede das Judarias — a “network of Jewish sites” that has already enlisted 22 towns and cities to research and renovate their former synagogues, ritual baths, Jewish quarters or draw up blueprints for local museums. These include Belmonte, where Jews carried on in secret for five hundred years. And tiny Trancoso, a town where buried carvings of hundreds of Jewish symbols were recently found, has just opened its ambitious Isaac Cardoso Center for Jewish Interpretation, as well as its first temple since the late 15th century. To network creator Jorge Patrao, a non-Jewish official in Portugal’s isolated Serra da Estrela mountain province, his brainchild won’t just “spur income in places where tourism was based mostly on snow,” but help to “reclaim so much of our region’s historic identity.”

The same can be said for Portugal’s uncompromising embrace of its exiled children. Given the Nazis’ mass extermination of Sephardic communities, author Zimler notes, “it’s too bad the gesture comes eighty years too late.” But, says lawmaker Roseira, “we can only set things right for our time, see the past with our own eyes.”

http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Portugal-okays-law-of-return-for-Sephardic-Jews-389431

Portugal becomes 2nd country, after Israel, with a Jewish law of return

500 years after the expulsion of its community, Lisbon’s new legislation corrects a moral wrong, albeit with some ‘economic considerations as well’

BY CNAAN LIPHSHIZ July 12, 2013, 8:16 pm 143

http://www.timesofisrael.com/portugal-becomes-2nd-country-after-israel-with-a-jewish-law-of-return/

JTA — Until 2009, right-wing Portuguese politician Jose Ribeiro e Castro didn’t have much interest in the expulsion of his country’s

Jewish community in the 16th century. That changed once Ribeiro e Castro opened a Facebook account.

Online, the 60-year-old lawmaker and journalist connected to several Sephardic Jews, descendants of a once robust Jewish community numbering in the hundreds of thousands, many of whom were forced into exile in 1536 during the Portuguese Inquisition. Eventually the encounters morphed into a commitment to rectify a historic injustice.

For Ribeiro e Castro, correcting the injustice meant spearheading a bill to naturalize the Jewish descendants of expelled Jews, a measure that unanimously passed the Portuguese parliament in April and went on the books last week, making Portugal the only country besides Israel with a Jewish law of return.

“The law is a commendable initiative,” said Nuno Wahnon Martins, the Lisbon-born director of European affairs for B’nai B’rith International. “It has economic considerations as well, which do not subtract from parliament’s worthy decision.”

King John III, who requested the inquisition in Portugal (photo credit: Wikipedia commons)

Portugal’s initiative comes as countries across Europe continue to invest millions to develop Jewish heritage sites — an effort they say is rooted in their belated recognition of the continent’s vibrant Jewish history, but often is also an acknowledged attempt to attract tourist dollars at a time of economic stagnation.

Last year, Spain announced a similar repatriation plan to Portugal’s, though the effort has yet to advance

Last year, Spain announced a similar repatriation plan to Portugal’s, though the effort has yet to advance. And the country boasts a network of nearly two dozen cities and towns, known as Red de Juderias, aimed at preserving Spain’s Jewish cultural history in an effort to attract tourists.

Later this month, Portugal will open a $1.5 million learning center in Trancoso, a town once home to many Jews. The prime minister is slated to attend the July 19 opening of the center, which will be aimed at the area’s anusim, descendants of Jews forcibly converted during the Inquisition.

“The tourism drive and the repatriation effort in Portugal and Spain are connected on several levels,” said Michael Freund, founder and chairman of Shavei Israel, a Jerusalem-based nonprofit that runs outreach programs for anusim and will operate the Trancoso center. “The Sephardic Diaspora can be viewed as a large pool with the potential to benefit Spain and Portugal’s economies, provided that pool can be drawn to visit, settle and invest.”

Ribeiro e Castro, a soft-spoken man who tends to gesticulate vibrantly when discussing politics, insists he has no ulterior motives for promoting the legislation.

‘The tourism drive and the repatriation effort in Portugal and Spain are connected on several levels’

“For me, this is purely a historical and emotional goal,” he said. “These efforts got stuck in Spain had remained stuck also in Portugal for a long time, until we move them along.”

According to Ribeiro e Castro, his involvement in the project began as an experiment. In 2010, he encouraged several of his Jewish Facebook friends to apply for Portuguese citizenship, “just to see what happens.”

At first, Portugal’s powerful Socialist Party was none too thrilled about inviting descendants of Portuguese Jews to return. But the Socialists eventually came around, submitting their own bill to naturalize Sephardic Jews that ultimately was incorporated into Ribeiro e Castro’s amendment to the Law on Nationality.

The new legislation says “the government will give nationality … to Sephardic Jews of Portuguese ancestry who belong to a tradition of a Portuguese-descended Sephardic community, based on objective prerequisites proving a connection to Portugal through names, language and ancestry.”

The law names Ladino, the Spanish-based Jewish dialect spoken by some 100,000 people worldwide, as a viable “linguistic connection.”

Whatever his motivation, focusing international attention on the Catholic Church’s dark history is a bold choice for Ribeiro e Castro, a Catholic himself and former director of the Church-affiliated TVI network. He attributes his decision to an old high school buddy who taught him about Sephardic traditions in Portugal, and to his father, who served as Portugal’s colonial governor in Angola in the 1970s.

‘My father was an admirer of what he called “small history,” minor developments with a huge impact. Naturalizing the Sephardim could be that’

“My father was an admirer of what he called ‘small history,’ minor developments with a huge impact,” Ribeiro e Castro said. “Naturalizing the Sephardim could be that.”

For the law to have any impact, bureaucrats in Lisbon first need to address a host of complications. The Portuguese Bar Association already has warned that the law could compromise the constitutional principle of equality before the law.

And then there are practical issues.

“Differentiating between Jews whose families were exiled [from] Spain and those who fled Portugal is very difficult,” said Jose Oulman Carp, president of Lisbon’s Jewish community. “Clearly the Jewish communities [of Portugal] will need to be consulted on the screening process and we can provide some input, but the distinction is nearly impossible in many cases.”

But whatever the end result, merely the effort to lure back Portuguese Jews constitutes, in Freund’s mind, an ironic twist of history.

“Five centuries ago, the expulsion happened partly because the Iberian rulers wanted the Jews’ assets,” Freund said. “Now we see efforts to welcome back the Jews partly for the same reason.”

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

28 July 1982 Keith Green Killed in Plane Crash #otdimjh

1000024434

“I repent of ever having recorded one single song and ever having performed one concert if my music, and more importantly — my life — has not provoked you into godly jealousy, or to sell out more completely to Jesus!”

Screen Shot 2015-07-28 at 08.22.45

“The only music minister to whom the Lord will say, ‘Well done, thy good and faithful servant,’ is the one whose life proves what their lyrics are saying…And to whom music is the least important part of their life. Glorifying the only Worthy One has to be a minister’s most important goal!” 

1000022086

Keith Gordon Green (October 21, 1953 – July 28, 1982) was an American contemporary Christian music pianist, singer and songwriter originally from Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn, New York. Beyond his music, Green is best known for his strong devotion to Christian evangelism and challenging others to the same. Often considered controversial for his frequently confrontational lyrics and spoken messages, he wrote some notable songs alone and with his wife, Melody Green, including “Your Love Broke Through”, “You Put This Love in My Heart”, and “Asleep in the Light”. Green is also known for numerous popular modern hymns, including “O Lord, You’re Beautiful” and “There Is a Redeemer”, written by his wife, Melody.

330px-Keithgreen

Prayer: Thank you Lord for this radical, prophetic and creative Jewish believer in Yeshua, and the lives changed through his music, ministry and mission. Help us to follow his example and be truly dedicated and committed to knowing and serving you. In Yeshua’s name, Amen.

Screen Shot 2015-07-28 at 08.02.15 

There Is A Redeemer lyrics © Universal Music Publishing Group

Screen Shot 2015-07-28 at 08.05.27

There is a redeemer,

Jesus, God’s own Son,

Precious Lamb of God, Messiah,

Holy One,

Jesus my redeemer,

Name above all names,

Precious Lamb of God, Messiah,

Hope for sinners slain.

Thank you oh my father,

For giving us Your Son,

And sending Your Spirit,

‘Til the work on Earth is done.

When I stand in Glory,

I will see His face,

And there I’ll serve my King forever,

In that Holy Place.

Thank you oh my Father,

For giving us Your Son,

And sending Your Spirit,

‘Til the work on Earth is done.

More Keith Green lyrics

http://www.keithgreen.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Green

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6I9dLO63YlA

From the Official Website

Keith was born in New York near Brooklyn. His mom had been a singer with the Big Bands, his dad a schoolteacher. Before he was two his mom said Keith had perfect pitch as he sang his baby songs. A year later his family moved to CA and settled into the newly developed orchards of the San Fernando Valley, just a short drive to Hollywood, which would play a significant role in Keith’s future.

Keith’s parents made sure he learned how to play guitar and piano at a young age. He liked piano best, but got bored playing the long classical pieces. So instead of learning to read sheet music, he’d memorize each piece, then pretend to be site reading when his teacher was there. But his grandfather, who started Jaguar Records, the first rock and roll label, taught Keith how to play chords on the piano… and was he end of classical music for him. From that moment on Keith began writing and singing his own songs. He was only 6 years old at the time.

When he was 11 Keith signed a recording contract with Decca Records, singing his own songs. Although his pictures were in the Teen Magazines and his single had some minor success, the industry didn’t know how market with such a young artist. Keith was very disappointed and at 14, felt like a total failure, a ‘has been’ which was very difficult for someone who had been groomed all his life to be a pop star.

Keith was 15 the first time he ran away from home. He started a journal that very day and for years as he looked for musical adventure and spiritual truth, the wrote his journey down. Keith had a Jewish background, but he grew up reading the New Testament. He called it “a confusing combination” that left him deeply unsatisfied. His journey led him to drugs, eastern mysticism, and free love.

When Keith was 19 he met a fellow seeker/musician named Melody. They were inseparable and got married a year later — now he had a partner as his spiritual quest continued. Then when he had nearly given up hope, Keith found the truth he had been looking for. He now was 21 and never looked back.

Keith had grown up reading about Jesus in the bible, but was confused when he figured out he was Jewish, a fact his family had hidden from him. But now what once confused him made sense as Keith proudly told the world, “I’m a Jewish Christian.” As soon as Keith opened his heart to Jesus, he and Melody opened their home. Anyone with a need, or who wanted to kick drugs, or get off the street, was welcome. Of course, they always heard plenty about Jesus at what fondly became known as “The Greenhouse.”

Not only did Keith’s life take a radical turn, but by then he was a highly skilled musician and songwriter, and so all of his songs changed too. His quest for stardom had ended. And now his songs reflected the absolute thrill of finding Jesus and seeing his own life radically changed. Keith’s spiritual intensity not only took him beyond most people’s comfort zones, but it constantly drove him even beyond his own places of content.

Somewhat reluctantly, Keith was thrust into a “John the Baptist” type ministry — calling believers to wake up, repent, and live a life that looked like what they said they believed. Keith felt he would have met Jesus sooner if not for Christians who led double lives. He made audiences squirm by saying, “If you praise and worship Jesus with your mouth, and your life does not praise and worship him, there’s something wrong!”

The radical commitment Keith preached was also the kind of faith he wanted his own life to display. About Jesus Keith said, “Loving Him is to be our cause. He can take care of a lot of other causes without us, but He can’t make us love Him with all our heart. That’s the work we must do. Anything else is an imitation.”

Keith’s songs were often birthed during his own spiritual struggles. When he pointed his finger at hypocrisy, he knew he had four fingers pointing back at himself. He penned honest and vulnerable lyrics—but left room for God to convict the rest of us too. He knew the journey to heaven often twists through rocky valleys, and saw no value in portraying his journey as otherwise.

With Keith’s honesty, he would have chafed against a glossed-over reading of his own life. After all, Keith was in the spotlight as he grew in Jesus. So when he made mistakes, he would talk about them to portray his life honestly. He believed we miss something essential when we overlook the frailty and humanity of others as well as ourselves. He knew he was far from perfect, but he passionately hungered and thirsted after righteousness.

Keith was constantly praying, asking the Holy Spirit to, “Please change my heart, and convict me of my sin.” And when he was convicted, he took action. If he needed to repent, he repented. If he needed to phone someone to ask forgiveness, he made the call.

Keith’s views on many subjects were often controversial -– especially when it came to charging for his ministry. With his albums at the top of industry charts. Keith decided to give his albums away for whatever people could afford, even for free. Keith’s heart was to make sure those who could not afford to buy his music could get it. Since Keith and Melody felt their songs were musical ministry messages and they did not want anyone left out due to lack of funds. At last count at least 15 years ago over 200,000 albums were sent into prisions and to the poor, without charge.

The same issue arose with Keith’s concerts, which he felt were nights of ministry. After a few years of trying different ways of funding his concerts there was just one idea that gave him peace. He decided his concerts would be free so anyone who wanted could come. The ministry would rent a hall or stadium and Keith took one offering for LDM to help cover the expenses. He and Melody did not receive any of the offerings because they were able to support themselves with their music royalties.

Doing free concerts along with Keith’s new album policy were moves that sent shockwaves through the Christian music industry, causing, some record labels, bookstores, or other artists to question his motives. Some thought he wanted to undercut the system and make others look bad. But that wasn’t his heart at all and in the end it was understood he was just following his convictions.

The Lord had taken Keith from concerts of 20 or less — to stadiums of 12,000 people. At his concerts Keith always gave an altar call and led thousands upon thousands to the Lord, and just as many firmly recommitted their lives fully to serve the Lord.

Keith began to appear on many television and radio programs. He talked about his walk with God and played a song or two. But his heart was to please the Lord. His childhood dream of becoming a super star had been cleansed from his heart years before with something better – being a servant of God.

Keith said, ”I only want to build God’s Kingdom and see it increase, not my own. If someone writes a great poem no one praises the pencil they used, they praise the one who created the poem. Well, I’m just a pencil in the hands of the Lord. Don’t praise me, praise Him!”

For Keith, meeting Jesus was one thing. Becoming more like Him was another. He struggled with the same things we all do – developing self discipline, deadlines, bad attitudes, selfishness, and ministry issues screaming for attention. He was also trying to disciple the 70 new believers who had come to be part of LDM, which by now had moved to East Texas. Besides all this, Keith still had music to write, articles to finish, and a growing family and wife to take care of.

After striving for years to measure up to God’s holiness, at times even questioning his own salvation, Keith came into a deeper understanding of the sacrifice Jesus made on the cross — both to forgive his sins, and to clothe him in His righteousness. It was like a huge weight had been lifted off of his chest.

It wasn’t that Keith became less concerned with purity and holiness. But now he was more motivated by love and less by fear in His pursuit of Jesus. He learned so much more about God’s grace and the importance of pausing simply to behold His glory and enjoy His presence. That is perhaps, what Keith loved most.

In 1982 Keith and Melody took a trip to Europe, including Greece and the UK, and their hearts were stirred.. especially when they visited the ministry in the Red Light district of Amsterdam, the open drug use, and the lack of thriving churches where ever they went. Kith asked every leader what we could do, they all said, “Please tell people we need them to come help us.”

KGPhotos-40

So Keith decided that at his 1982 Fall Tour he would challenge the Christians in America to get out of their comfort zones, and into the the world to reach the hurting.. So in the last few months of his life, with his heart turned back to winning souls, LDM booked large arenas for the Fall Tour, Melody wrote some missions songs, and YWAM founder Loren Cunningham was going to come to talk about the needs in the world, and give an missions altar call.

Keith’s heart had fully turned back to those who probably wouldn’t show up at a concert or a church. Keith wanted to go back out into the streets and into the prisons the way he and Melody did as new believers. He wanted to go to the mission fields of the nations, and into secular clubs to reach people with his music. However, it was not to be.

On July 28, 1982, there was a small plane crash and Keith went home to be with Jesus. The crash also took the life of his three-year-old son Josiah, and his two year old daughter, Bethany. Melody was home with their one year old, Rebekah, and was also six weeks pregnant with their fourth child, Rachel. Keith was only 28 years old.

Although Keith is now with Jesus, his life and ministry is still making a huge impact around the world. His songs and passionate delivery are still changing lives. His writings are translated into many languages. Keith once said, “When I die I just want to be remembered as a Christian.” It’s safe to say he reached his goal, and perhaps, a bit more.

Keith Green was simply a man of conviction. When his convictions led him to an eternally worthy object in the person of Jesus he sold all that he had—ambitions, possessions, and dreams—to possess His love. In so doing he became a man of devotion. He also became a man remembered, and still missed, by millions around the world.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments