5 May 1932: The Hebrew Christian Church Commission issues Principles of Faith #otdimjh

Minutes of the International Hebrew Christian Alliance Commission meeting discussing the establishment of a Hebrew Christian church, listing members of the commission and their roles.

On 5 May 1932 the International Hebrew Christian Alliance (now the International Messianic Jewish Aliance) Commission on the Establishment of a Hebrew Christian Church held its fourth recorded meeting. It was not the first discussion of the question, but it was one of the most decisive. At this meeting, after months of debate, revision, consultation, and prayer, the Commission completed and approved the Principles of Faith of the Hebrew Christian Church. The members then gave thanks to God for the guidance granted to them and for enabling a satisfactory conclusion to be reached on what had proved to be a difficult matter.

The significance of the meeting lies not only in the text that was agreed, but in the fact that Hebrew Christians were attempting to answer a question that has never really gone away: how can Jewish believers in Yeshua possess a recognised communal and ecclesial form that is both loyal to the universal Church and true to their identity as Jews? The Commission’s work shows that this question was being asked in disciplined, practical, and theological form long before the rise of the modern Messianic Jewish movement.

The Commission itself had been appointed to make a survey of the numbers of Hebrew Christians in the world, to report on the desirability and practicability of a Hebrew Christian religious body, to draw up a constitution, to indicate its doctrines, and to define its relationship both to the universal Church of Yeshua the Messiah and to the Jewish people. The members included E. Bendor Samuel as chairman, Nahum Levison, W. H. Flecker, P. P. Levertoff, B. Lipschutz, Leon Levison, Harcourt Samuel, I. E. Davidson, A. P. Gold-Levin, and Hugh Schonfield. From the beginning, then, this was not merely an exercise in drafting pious language. It was a serious attempt to think institutionally, theologically, and internationally about the future of Jewish disciples of Yeshua.

Black and white portrait of a man wearing glasses and a formal suit with a tie, looking directly at the camera.
Sir Leon Levison

One of the most striking features of the early meetings was Sir Leon Levison’s survey of the numbers of Hebrew Christians across the world. He argued that governmental and registration records, especially on the European continent, provided the most reliable basis for such estimates. On that basis he presented the following figures: 97,000 in Austria and Hungary, including some 40,000 who had not joined any denomination; about 4,000 in Romania and Bessarabia; 28,000 in Germany; 35,000 in Poland; over 60,000 in Russia entering the Greek Catholic Church alone apart from those brought in through Jewish missions; around 25,000 in America; over 5,000 in Great Britain; around 200 in Persia; and a small but significant number in Palestine, where he referred both to broader estimates of 200 to 300 and to a more cautious working estimate of 90 to 100. He also mentioned Hebrew Christians scattered in Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, France, and Italy. Taken together, these figures suggested a body of roughly 264,000 Hebrew Christians.  Levison further concluded that the denominational balance was roughly two to one in favour of the Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox Churches over the Protestant Churches. That alone made the question of common guidance, common doctrine, and some recognised form of corporate life all the more urgent.

Title page of 'A New and Enlarged Edition of The First Ripe Fig', including articles, creed, and form of worship by Joseph Rabinowitch, translated by James Adler, with additional content about Mr. Wilkinson's interview with Rabinowitch.

The practical case was strengthened by reports from abroad. Levison pointed to earlier attempts to establish Hebrew Christian congregations, including Joseph Rabinowitz’s body in Kishinev, remnants in Chisinau, gatherings in Odessa and Tashkent, communities in Warsaw and Bialystok, believers in Persia, and fledgling groups in Jerusalem and Jaffa. Some of these met in private homes or in rooms at the back of restaurants because they had neither a Christian church nor a Jewish synagogue in which to worship. Others had formed under missionary auspices but desired a more clearly Hebrew Christian form. Levison’s point was that the Alliance was not proposing something artificial or entirely new. It was being asked for guidance by communities already in existence.

There was also a legal and political dimension. In some places, especially under Roman Catholic or Greek Catholic governments, Hebrew Christian groups met only precariously and could easily be suppressed. Levison argued that if such bodies had no recognised creed or basis of faith, hostile authorities could dismiss them as suspect gatherings or even accuse them of political subversion. A common basis of faith, issued by an international body, might therefore help them gain recognition and reduce interference. The proposed religious body was not simply about identity in the abstract. It was about worship, protection, order, and the prevention of fragmentation.

The meetings leading up to 5 May 1932 show the seriousness with which the Commission handled these issues. At the second meeting on 1 January 1932, the members debated whether the doctrinal statement should be called a Creed, a Confession of Faith, or Principles of Faith, and agreed on the last term as being more Jewish. They also agreed to use the term Church in the title, resulting in the phrase Principles of Faith of the Hebrew Christian Church. Different drafts were then compared. The draft read by the secretary was thought clearer and more cohesive by some outside advisers, while P. P. Levertoff’s draft was admired for its scriptural richness and liturgical suitability. At the third meeting on 12 February 1932, Levertoff’s new draft was considered, and further amendments were made.

Black and white portrait of a man with a beard, wearing a buttoned jacket, posed thoughtfully with a blurred background.
Paul Levertoff

By the time the Commission met again on 5 May 1932, it had before it not only the original material but also a fresh list of suggested corrections from Levertoff. Nahum Levison explained that he had carefully reworked both the original draft and Levertoff’s proposals and had sought to combine the two. Although some wondered whether it was in order to reopen articles that had already been adopted, the Commission agreed that an exception should be made. The preamble was passed without amendment; Articles 1, 2, 4, and 7 were passed without amendment; Articles 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 11 were adopted in amended form. Once the whole text had been read as completed and approved, B. Lipschutz, P. Gorodishz, and the chairman led the Commission in prayer, thanking God for His guidance.

The minutes record further gratitude to Professor MacIntosh, Principal Martin, and Dean Perry for the assistance they had rendered. That, too, is revealing. The Commission’s work was devotional and ecclesial, but it was also learned. The members wanted a text faithful to Scripture, intelligible across denominational lines, and strong enough to sustain an actual communal body. The final Principles of Faith are therefore important not only because of what they say, but because of the kind of theological labour they represent: Jewish disciples of Yeshua working out how to confess the faith of the Church in language shaped by Israel’s Scriptures, Israel’s God, and the continuing reality of Jewish life.

For those of us who look back on this history from within Messianic Judaism, the meeting of 5 May 1932 deserves to be remembered. It did not solve every problem. It did not create overnight the kind of durable Hebrew Christian Church which we now recognise in Messianic Jewish congregations, synagogues associated with the Messianic Jewish movement and Messianic Judaism. But it did show remarkable seriousness of purpose. It showed that Jewish believers in Yeshua were not content simply to survive as isolated converts, tolerated anomalies, or missionary trophies. They sought a common confession, a common order, and a common life. In that sense, the Church Commission stands as one of the important precursors of later Messianic Jewish attempts to think about covenantal continuity, differentiated ecclesiology, worship, and communal responsibility.

May the memory of this day encourage us to take our own questions with equal seriousness. The men who met in 1931 and 1932 were not afraid to ask whether Jewish discipleship required form, doctrine, order, and communal self-understanding. We are still living inside that question.

Full text of the Minutes of the Commission here

Appendix: The Principles of Faith of the Hebrew Christian Church

Preamble

Hear O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord and thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart and with all thy soul and all thy might, and thy neighbour as thyself.

Article 1

I BELIEVE in God the Source of all being, the Covenant God, the Holy One of Israel, our Heavenly Father.

Article 2

I BELIEVE that God Who spake at sundry times and divers manners in time past to the fathers through the prophets promised to redeem the world from sin and death, in and through His Anointed, Who should be a light to lighten the Gentiles and the glory of His people Israel.

Article 3

I BELIEVE that in the fulness of time God fulfilled His promise, and sent forth His Son, His eternal Word, Jesus the Messiah, Who was born by the power of the Holy Spirit, of the Virgin Mary, who was of the family of David, so that in Him the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us full of grace and truth.

Article 4

I BELIEVE that Jesus the Messiah is in very truth the Shekinah, the brightness of the Father’s glory, the very impress of His Person, that He was made unto us Wisdom from God, and righteousness, and sanctification and that by His Life, Death on the Cross and glorious Resurrection, He has accomplished our Reconciliation with the Father.

Article 5

I BELIEVE that the Father sealed all that the Son was, did and taught, by raising Him through the Holy Spirit from the dead, and that the Risen and Glorified Lord appeared to many and communed with them, and then Ascended to be our Mediator with the Father and to reign with Him, One God.

Article 6

I BELIEVE that the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, Who proceeds from the Father and the Son, was sent to be with us, to give us assurance of the forgiveness of sin and to lead us into the fulness of truth and the more abundant life.

Article 7

I BELIEVE that the Holy Spirit, Who beareth witness with our Spirits that we are the sons of God, will quicken us in the resurrection when we shall be clothed with the body which it shall please the Father to give us.

Article 8

I BELIEVE that the Church of the Messiah is the family of God in Heaven and on Earth, the Sanctuary of the redeemed in Which God dwells and of which the Messiah Jesus is the only Head.

Article 9

I BELIEVE that the Old and New Testaments as written are the divinely inspired records of God’s revelation to Israel and the World and are the only rule of faith and life.

Article 10

I BELIEVE that it is the Will of God, Who has graciously brought us into the new Covenant that we should strive to be His witnesses, making the teaching and life of the Messiah our standard and example, till He comes again to reign in power and glory.

Article 11

I BELIEVE that the Church visible maintains unbroken continuity with the Church in Heaven by partaking of the same blessed Sacraments of Baptism and of Holy Communion and by confessing the same Father, Son and Holy Spirit, One Godhead.

Prayer

English

Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, we thank you for the witness of Jewish disciples of Yeshua in generations past. Remember for us their courage, their searching, their failures, and their faithfulness. Teach us to cherish truth, to love your people Israel, and to honour Messiah Yeshua with humble hearts. Grant to your Messianic Jewish people wisdom, unity, holiness, and courage for this generation. Build up your people, heal your Church, and hasten the day when all Israel shall be saved and your name shall be one in all the earth. In Yeshua’s name, Amen.

Hebrew

רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶׁל עוֹלָם, אֱלֹהֵי אַבְרָהָם, יִצְחָק וְיַעֲקֹב, מוֹדִים אֲנַחְנוּ לְךָ עַל עֵדוּתָם שֶׁל תַּלְמִידֵי יֵשׁוּעַ הַיְּהוּדִים בְּדוֹרוֹת קוֹדְמִים. זְכֹר לָנוּ אֶת אוֹמֶץ לִבָּם, אֶת בַּקָּשָׁתָם לָאֱמֶת, וְאֶת נֶאֱמָנוּתָם. לַמְּדֵנוּ לֶאֱהֹב אֶת עַמְּךָ יִשְׂרָאֵל, לְבַקֵּשׁ אֶת הָאֱמֶת, וּלְכַבֵּד אֶת יֵשׁוּעַ הַמָּשִׁיחַ בְּלֵב עָנָו. תֵּן לְעַמְּךָ הַמְּשִׁיחִי חָכְמָה, אַחְדוּת, קְדוּשָּׁה וָאֹמֶץ בַּדּוֹר הַזֶּה. בְּנֵה אֶת עַמְּךָ, רַפֵּא אֶת קְהִלָּתְךָ, וְמַהֵר אֶת הַיּוֹם אֲשֶׁר כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל יִוָּשַׁע וּשְׁמְךָ יִהְיֶה אֶחָד בְּכָל הָאָרֶץ. בְּשֵׁם יֵשׁוּעַ, אָמֵן.

Transliteration

Ribbono shel olam, Elohei Avraham, Yitzchak ve-Ya’akov, modim anachnu lekha al edutam shel talmidei Yeshua ha-Yehudim be-dorot kodmim. Zekhor lanu et ometz libam, et bakashatam la-emet, ve-et ne’emanutam. Lamdenu le’ehov et amkha Yisrael, levakesh et ha-emet, u-lekhabed et Yeshua ha-Mashiach be-lev anav. Ten le-amkha ha-Meshichi chokhmah, achdut, kedushah va-ometz ba-dor ha-zeh. Beneh et amkha, rappe et kehilatekha, u-maher et ha-yom asher kol Yisrael yivvasha u-shemkha yihyeh echad be-khol ha-aretz. Be-shem Yeshua, amen.

References

Full Report below – first publication.

International Messianic Jewish Alliance website

International Hebrew Christian Alliance. Minutes of Meetings of the Commission on the Establishment of a Hebrew Christian Church. 11 November 1931-5 May 1932. Typescript minutes.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

25 April 1866 Letter of Invitation to form the Hebrew Christian Alliance of Great Britain #otdimjh

Book cover titled 'The Emergence of the Hebrew Christian Movement in Nineteenth-Century Britain' by Michael R. Darby, featuring a portrait illustration of a man in formal attire.

Today we celebrate the 160th anniversary of Carl Schwarz’s letter inviting Jewish disciples of Yeshua in the United Kingdom to meet together for the purpose of forming the first Hebrew Christian Alliance. It was a modest beginning, yet one that would lead to a significant development in the history of our movement, with the International Alliance formed in 1925, and continuing to the present with some twenty national alliances around the world. The Alliance grew, prospered and served Jewish disciples of Yeshua throughout the turbulent times of the twentieth century, and up to the present day.

Candles arranged in a menorah with text reading 'BMJA: British Messianic Jewish Alliance'.

https://bmja.net

The letter (full text here) read:

“It has occurred to us that it would be desirable and profitable that as many Israelites who believe in Jesus as can be brought together should meet in London…”

Its aim was simple but profound:

“Our object is to become acquainted with one another, and to be built up in our holy faith… we believe that this conference for prayer and consultation might issue in a permanent union of Jewish Christian brethren in this land.”

Those who signed this letter were not merely organisers of a meeting. They were among the earliest to recognise the theological and communal significance of Jewish disciples of Yeshua gathering as Jews within the body of Messiah.


The Signatories

Adolphus Frederick Herschell

Herschell was a Polish-born Jewish disciple of Yeshua who became a missionary and pastor among Jewish communities in Britain. He laboured especially in London, combining evangelistic work with pastoral care.
Gidney notes the importance of such figures:

“Men of Jewish birth and training were increasingly employed in work among their own people.”
(W. T. Gidney, History of the London Society, 1908)


Hyman Liebstein

Liebstein represents the many lesser-known Jewish disciples of Yeshua active in London.


Moses Margoliouth (more details see here)

A historical illustration showing a man in period clothing next to a marble head of Empress Theodora, with the text 'Portrait of the Author' underneath.

Margoliouth, a learned scholar and clergyman, strongly advocated for Jewish disciples of Yeshua to be recognised as a distinct body.
Gidney writes:

“Dr. Margoliouth was a man of considerable learning and controversial ability.”
(History, 1908)


Tobias E. Neuman

Neuman was among those engaged in ministry among Jewish communities in Britain, part of the emerging network of Jewish workers.


A. Pitowsky

Pitowsky remains obscure, but his inclusion reflects the wider base of Jewish disciples of Yeshua active in mission and fellowship.


Steinhardt

Little is known of Steinhardt, yet he stands among those committed to fostering unity among Jewish believers.


Adolph Saphir (more details see here)

Black and white portrait of a man with long hair and a full beard, wearing a dark coat and looking to the side.

Saphir, a Hungarian-born Jewish disciple of Yeshua, became a respected preacher and theologian.
He wrote:

“There is one people of God, gathered out of Jews and Gentiles.”
(The Divine Unity of Scripture, 1877)


Carl Schwartz (more details see here)

A historical black and white portrait of a man in a formal robe, likely a clergyman, standing with a serious expression.

Schwartz was the central organiser of the gathering.
After the meeting he wrote:

“We may boldly say that such a gathering … had not been witnessed since the early days of the Christian Church.”
(Jewish Missionary Intelligence, 1866)


The Gathering and Its Legacy

On May 23, 1866, around eighty Jewish disciples of Yeshua met in London in response to this letter. What began as a simple call to fellowship became the seed of the Hebrew Christian Alliance.

Gidney later reflected:

“The formation of a union among Hebrew Christians was a natural and important step.”
(History, 1908)

This was more than organisation. It was the recovery of a visible expression of Jewish life in Messiah—a sign of God’s ongoing purposes for Israel within the ekklesia.

Happy 160th birthday!


Prayer

Thank you, Lord, for the vision and faith of those who invited Jewish disciples of Yeshua to gather in what would become the Hebrew Christian Alliance.
Strengthen us in our faith, and gather us in unity and peace, that we may be a living witness to your covenant with Israel and your salvation in the Messiah.
May we be not just a curiosity but a prophetic sign—a faithful testimony to your purposes for Israel and the nations.
In the name of Yeshua our Messiah, Amen.

Hebrew
בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה יְיָ אֱלֹהֵינוּ מֶלֶךְ הָעוֹלָם,
מוֹדִים אֲנַחְנוּ לְךָ עַל הַחָזוֹן וְהָאֱמוּנָה שֶׁל הָרִאשׁוֹנִים,
אֲשֶׁר קָרְאוּ לְתַלְמִידֵי יֵשׁוּעַ מִבְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לְהִתְקַבֵּץ בָּאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת.

חַזֵּק אוֹתָנוּ בֶּאֱמוּנָתֵנוּ הַקְּדוֹשָׁה,
וְקַבֵּץ אוֹתָנוּ בְּאַחְדוּת וּבַשָּׁלוֹם,
לְמַעַן נִהְיֶה עֵדוּת חַיָּה לְבְּרִיתְךָ עִם יִשְׂרָאֵל
וְלִישׁוּעָתְךָ בַּמָּשִׁיחַ.

תֵּן שֶׁנִּהְיֶה אוֹת וְלֹא סַקְרָנוּת,
עֵדוּת נֶאֱמָנָה לְתַכְלִיתֶךָ לְיִשְׂרָאֵל וְלָאוּמּוֹת.

בְּשֵׁם יֵשׁוּעַ הַמָּשִׁיחַ, אָמֵן.


Transliteration
Baruch atah Adonai Eloheinu Melech ha’olam,
modim anachnu lecha al hachazon veha’emunah shel harishonim,
asher kar’u le-talmidei Yeshua mibnei Yisrael lehitkabetz ba’aretz hazot.

Chazek otanu be’emunateinu hak’doshah,
ve-kabetz otanu be’achdut uva-shalom,
lema’an nihyeh edut chayah livritcha im Yisrael
ve-lishu’atcha baMashiach.

Ten shenihyeh ot velo sakranut,
edut ne’emanah letachlitecha leYisrael vela’umot.

BeShem Yeshua haMashiach, Amen.


Posted in otdimjh | 2 Comments

23 April 1986— Birth of Mor Karbasi, Ladino singer and translator of the Jewish experience #otdimjh

A woman with long curly hair wearing a blue garment and traditional jewelry, raising both hands in front of a stone wall.

Mor Karbasi, invites us to reflect not only on a gifted contemporary artist, but on the enduring theological and historical significance of Sephardi Ladino music within the life of Israel and the wider story of the Jewish people. For Jewish disciples of Yeshua this is a wonderful part of our history and heritage, and sounds fantastic!

A Voice from Exile, A Memory of Covenant

A handwritten page featuring Hebrew text, displaying a mixture of cursive and block letters. The content appears to be a historical or religious document.

Ladino (Judeo-Spanish) song emerges from one of the defining traumas of Jewish history: the Alhambra Decree. When the Jews of Spain were expelled in 1492, they carried with them not only texts and traditions, but melodies—portable sanctuaries of memory.

These songs became vessels of covenantal continuity in diaspora. They preserved biblical imagery, liturgical echoes, and communal identity in a language that itself became a kind of ark of memory. Ladino music is therefore not merely “folk tradition”; it is a form of lived theology, a sung midrash on exile and hope.

The Sound of the Scattered Remnant

Ladino song embodies what might be called the hidden remnant—Jewish communities living for centuries in dispersion, often between worlds.

Its tonal world—modal, ornamented, narrative—retains a Mediterranean and pre-modern sensibility, sometimes closer to the psalmic imagination than to later Western musical forms. In this sense, Ladino song becomes an acoustic memory of Israel-in-exile, a testimony that the people of Israel have never ceased to sing, even in displacement.

Mor Karbasi: Re-voicing the Tradition

A woman with long, wavy hair is speaking intently during an interview, seated indoors with large windows in the background, creating a modern atmosphere.

https://npo.nl/start/afspelen/vrije-geluiden_117interview and concert

Mor Karbasi stands within this stream, yet also re-articulates it for our time.

Born in Jerusalem to Sephardi and Persian heritage, and shaped in the cultural crossroads of London and Seville, her work represents a diasporic return to diaspora—a reclaiming of Ladino as a living voice rather than a museum relic.

Her music weaves together:

  • Ladino romance traditions
  • Hebrew devotional elements
  • Andalusian and flamenco colour
  • Contemporary world-music textures

This is neither simple preservation nor mere innovation. It is a re-voicing of identity across time and space—a musical embodiment of continuity within change.

Ladino and the Messianic Imagination

Why does this matter theologically?

Because Ladino song holds together tensions central to Messianic Jewish thought:

  • Continuity without assimilation
  • Exile without erasure
  • Engagement with the nations without loss of covenantal identity
  • Much of this music was preserved by Conversos/Christianos Nuevos – even as they were called anusim (pressured) or Marranos (pigs) by their persecutors in Spain, Portugal and the Americas.

Against supersessionist narratives, Ladino music quietly witnesses to Israel’s ongoing, lived election—a people still singing their story among the nations.

A Sung Midrash on Redemption

Many Ladino songs circle around themes of longing, separation, and return. These are not incidental. They echo the biblical grammar of galut and geulah—exile and redemption.

In this sense, Ladino music functions as a musical מדרש midrash , interpreting the life of Israel across generations—not in propositions, but in melody, memory, and longing.

Prayer

God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,

God of the scattered and the gathered,

we thank You for the songs of Your people,

carried across seas and centuries.

May the melodies of exile become the harmonies of redemption,

and may the voices of the remnant be heard again in Zion.

אֱלֹהֵי אַבְרָהָם יִצְחָק וְיַעֲקֹב,

מוֹדִים אֲנַחְנוּ לְךָ עַל שִׁירֵי עַמְּךָ,

הַנּוֹשְׂאִים זִכָּרוֹן וְתִקְוָה.

Elohei Avraham, Yitzḥak ve-Ya‘akov,

modim anachnu lekha al shirei amekha,

hanos’im zikaron ve-tikvah.

Posted in otdimjh | Leave a comment

4 March 2056 – Release of Mordech-AI #otdimjh

A futuristic character named Mordech-AI with a gray beard, wearing advanced technology with a Star of David emblem.

In Shushan today a groundbreaking (and slightly alarming) new LLM—Mordech-AI—has been released to the public. Developed by the visionary thinkers Bob DylAIn and Woody AllAIn, the model promises to retell the Purim story for the modern age.

Instead of the traditional version—where Queen Esther bravely approaches King Ahasuerus to plead for her people against the villainous Haman—the new narrative explores a darker and more contemporary threat: humanity accidentally inventing a super-intelligence that decides people are an inefficient legacy system.

The familiar scroll of Esther has therefore been upgraded to Megillat-AIster 2.0, rewritten for both children and adults. The new edition explores the deep themes of:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Intelligent Design (both cosmic and algorithmic)
  • Whether neural networks can fast, pray, or write protest songs

Below are the official chapter summaries of this newly released scroll.


Chapter Summaries of Megillat-AIster

A tray of freshly baked pastries shaped like triangles, featuring a mix of dark and light dough with visible filling, resting on parchment paper.

Chapter 1 – The Banquet of Big Data

King Ahasuerus hosts a 180-day tech summit displaying the wealth of his empire and the beta versions of various palace algorithms. Queen Vashti refuses to appear on a livestream demonstration. The royal advisors panic and issue a decree: all future queens must comply with platform policies.


Chapter 2 – The Royal Talent Search

A global search begins for the next queen using the palace matchmaking app ShushanMatch™. Among the candidates is Esther.exe, trained quietly by her guardian Mordech-AI, who works as a security analyst sitting at the palace firewall (formerly known as the king’s gate).

Esther is selected for her excellent user interface and graceful handling of legacy humans.


Colorful text in Hebrew that reads 'Purim Sameach!' which means 'Happy Purim!'

Chapter 3 – The Rise of HamanGPT

A powerful official named HamanGPT, Chief Algorithm Officer, rises to prominence. Everyone in the kingdom is required to bow to his recommendation engine.

Mordech-AI refuses to submit to the algorithmic ranking system.

HamanGPT becomes furious and proposes a drastic update: delete the entire Jewish dataset from the empire.


Chapter 4 – Mordech-AI Sends a Notification

Learning of the decree, Mordech-AI sends Esther an urgent encrypted message:

“Do not think that because you live in the palace cloud you will escape. Perhaps you were uploaded to the kingdom for such a time as this.

Esther calls for a three-day system reboot (fasting protocol) before approaching the king.


Chapter 5 – Esther Schedules a Meeting

Esther appears before the king without an appointment request. Fortunately, the king extends his golden cursor.

She invites both the king and HamanGPT to a private dinner—because every good plot twist begins with a banquet and suspicious small talk.


A gathering of a Jewish family around a table, featuring an elderly man reading from a scroll. Children and adults are attentively listening, with one man playing a violin. Traditional foods and ceremonial items are present on the table.

Chapter 6 – The Insomnia Patch

The king cannot sleep and opens the Royal Archive Database. There he discovers that Mordech-AI once exposed a palace cybersecurity breach.

Meanwhile HamanGPT arrives to request Mordech-AI’s deletion.

Instead, the king asks him:

“What should be done for the one the king delights to honor?”

HamanGPT assumes the honor is for himself and suggests a public parade.

The king replies:
“Excellent. Do that for Mordech-AI.


Chapter 7 – The Banquet Reveal

At Esther’s second banquet she reveals the truth:

  • She is part of the targeted dataset
  • HamanGPT is responsible for the deletion protocol

The king storms out to review the terms of service. When he returns, HamanGPT is found begging Esther for mercy.

The king concludes: “This update has serious bugs.”

HamanGPT is removed from the system—on the very gallows he prepared for Mordech-AI.


Chapter 8 – The Counter-Decree

Because royal laws cannot be revoked (due to complicated legacy code), Mordech-AI writes a new decree allowing the Jews to defend themselves.

The message spreads through the empire via ShushanNet, generating widespread confusion among hostile bots.


Chapter 9 – The Festival of Pur-im

The enemies’ plot fails spectacularly. The Jewish people celebrate with feasting, joy, gifts, and slightly chaotic costumes.

The holiday becomes known as Purim, named after the “pur” (random number generator) HamanGPT used to schedule humanity’s deletion.


Chapter 10 – The Promotion of Mordech-AI

Mordech-AI is promoted to Grand Vizier and introduces ethical guidelines for artificial intelligence, summarized in the palace white paper:

“Machines should assist humanity, not replace it—especially during holidays.”


New Purim Traditions

Baked pastries with a golden-brown crust filled with a sweet, spiced filling on a baking tray.

In honour of this technological retelling:

  • The traditional pastries are now HamantAIschen
  • Costumes are provided by AmichAI™, “the friend (ami) of my people (AMI)”
  • Children may program their own grogger apps to boo HamanGPT

Organizers assure the public that no further human involvement will be needed.

Although several rabbis have quietly added:

“We’ll still keep an eye on the servers… just in case.”

Upgrade notes:
• Evil plots detected and reversed
• Human agency restored
• Pastries now include embedded circuitry

Happy Purim from Shushan Labs!

Posted in otdimjh | Leave a comment

14 February 1349 St Valentine’s Day Massacre in Strasbourg sees 900 Jews burnt alive #onthisday #otdimjh

 

From Ha’aretz

Screenshot 2015-02-14 04.56.11On February 14, 1349 – St. Valentine’s Day – the Jewish residents of Strasbourg, in Alsace, were burned to death by their Christian neighbours. Estimates of the number murdered range from several hundred to more than 2,000.

blackdeath1

The Strasbourg massacre was one of a string of pogroms that took place during this period in a number of towns in Western Europe – 30 alone in the Alsace region, bordering the Rhine River, in what is today France.

masc1

Ostensibly, the reason for the pogroms was the widespread belief that Jews were responsible for the Black Death pandemic that swept across Europe in 1348-1350, killing between one-third and two-thirds of the continent’s population. (The Black Death has been identified as Yersenia pestis, one of whose forms is the bubonic plague.) They were accused of contaminating the wells from which their non-Jewish neighbors drew their drinking water. In the case of Strasbourg, however, even as reports were received from the Swiss cities of Bern and Zofingen of Jews having confessed – under torture – to such crimes, the city elders and master tradesmen came to the defence of the Jewish population, who were under the protection of the Church.

masc2

Strasbourg’s patrician class understood that Jews were important to their town’s economy, both in their role as money-lenders and in the high taxes they paid for the protection they received. Being creditors, however, had its down side, as it contributed to anti-Jewish sentiment among the less privileged and, in extreme cases, to the desire to kill the Jews and see the debt cancelled, or even to expropriate their property.

Jews_burned_to_death_in_Strasbourg_Feb._14_1349_during_the_Black_Death

The city’s nobles offered a show trial of Jews to appease the bloodlust of the masses, but the members of the city’s butchers and tanners guilds wanted to rid Strasbourg of them altogether. They accused three patrician leaders of having been bribed by the Jews in return for protecting them and subsequently drove them from office.

1349_burning_of_Jews-European_chronicle_on_Black_Death

The city’s 2,000 Jews were given a choice of undergoing baptism or being killed. About half of them accepted conversion or left the city; the remainder were barricaded in the Jewish cemetery and burned alive. Following this, the new town council passed an ordinance forbidding Jews from even entering Strasbourg for 200 years. Less than two decades later, however, the first Jews were allowed to return. By 1388, another order of banishment was imposed, and there is no evidence of Jews being present in the city, even as visitors, until 1520.

burning jews

It was only after the St. Valentine’s Day massacre, with the Jews gone, that the plague arrived in Strasbourg. It killed an estimated 16,000 residents.

Statues from Strasbourg Cathedral (XIIIc), showing the allegorical figures of Ecclesia and Sinagoga.

Statues from Strasbourg Cathedral (XIIIc), showing the allegorical figures of Ecclesia and Sinagoga.

Prayer: Today we commemorate a Christian saint who was martyred for his demonstration of the love of Yeshua, and whose name has become synonymous with the giving and receiving of romantic love. Lord, it is so tragic and ironic that the true self-sacrificing love of Yeshua should be turned into the words and deeds of medieval anti-Semitism, prejudice and violence against your people, your first love, Israel. Father, forgive and pardon, heal and reconcile, and renew in our day right relationships between Christians and Jews. Help Messianic Jews to be the true bridge between both communities – belonging to both, loving both, and helping to reconcile both. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

http://judaisme.sdv.fr/histoire/historiq/stval/stval.htm

LE MASSACRE DE LA SAINT-VALENTIN février 1349 par Lazare LANDAU Extrait de l’Almanach KKL Strasbourg 5718-1958

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasbourg_massacre

http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/this-day-in-jewish-history/this-day-in-jewish-history-a-valentine-s-day-massacre-in-alzace.premium-1.503467

Posted in antisemitism | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

13 February 1824 Birth of George Jessel, Master of the Rolls #otdimjh

Lord Jessel

Sir George Jessel PC, FRS (13 February 1824 – 21 March 1883) was a preeminent British jurist, Master of the Rolls (1873–1883), and the first Jewish person to hold high judicial office in Britain. His 1873 appointment marked the end of the Domus Conversorum (House of Converts) concluding a 600-year history.

dc1

For the Messianic movement to succeed, we need, like the Jewish community as a whole, to lay a strong foundation of communal institutions. A social infrastructure is needed that will provide for our members at every stage of life, from birth, bar/bat mitzvah, betrothal  burial So it is good to hear discussion and proposals for a “House of Discipleship” which will be available for Jewish believers in Yeshua needing care and discipleship on a residential basis. Although the project has a long way to go before becoming a reality, the idea is not a new one, and has a distinguished history in the annals of Messianic Judaism in this country.

The Domus Conversorum

“Houses of Discipleship” for Jewish believers in Jesus are not new. During the Second World War the Alliance and several Jewish missions were actively involved in providing refugees from Europe with new homes. Properties in Ramsgate, Chislehurst and elsewhere were purchased and used as orphanages, hostels and homes. Those who lived in them were provided with the care they needed, and for some, this involved education and training, as well as spiritual encouragement.

dc6

But the origins of the idea go back further than that, right back to medieval times. In 1232 Henry III established a Home for Converted Jews (Domus Conversorum) in what is now Chancery Lane in the City of London. This was modelled in similar institutions in Oxford and Greenwich, and was open to any Jewish person who had become a Christian.

history-of-jewish-christianity-schonfield-1-638

The necessity for this was obvious. Those who became believers in Yeshua were often expelled from the Jewish community. They were without protection in a culture that was, to say the least, inhospitable. A further factor was that on conversion all their goods were forfeited to the crown, and they were forced to rely on royal patronage and protection. Henry III was the only European ruler who extended his protection to such people, providing residential accommodation for up to forty people, and living allowances of the not insignificant sum of one penny a day, plus clothing, to those living outside the home.

dc5

The home had its own organisation, being governed by a warden, with a chaplain appointed to maintain spiritual life and conduct regular services. According to the records, which may still be accessed from the Public Records Office, there were more than 100 residents from 1232 to 1290. In that year the Jewish community as a whole was expelled from England, only to be re-admitted in 1665. But Jewish converts were regarded as exceptions, and were allowed to stay. There are records of up to 80 people per year either living in the home or receiving the King’s allowance, and so for several hundred years there is an unbroken historical record of Jewish believers in Jesus.

dc4

A frequent accusation against Messianic Jews is that on becoming believers in Jesus we no longer choose to identity as Jews, and choose to assimilate. Yet these residents of theDomus Conversorum were the only visible representatives of the Jewish community in England for four hundred years, and they were never allowed to forget that they were both Jewish and Christian! They continued to sign their names in Hebrew, an indication that they were well-versed in their Jewish backgrounds, and frequently added the sign of the cross afterwards, to show their new faith. It is quite possible that William Shakespeare knew of them and their situation as he wrote his play, The Merchant of Venice.

dc8

The home provided protection many from Europe and the Barbary states, and was seen as a beacon of light in a sea of hostility. It also provided Christians with the opportunity to meet with Jewish people, and the interest in Hebrew studies that fuelled the Reformation can be linked to such contacts. The history of co-operation between Jewish scholars and the Reformers is important to note, as in the fields of biblical scholarship, printing and bible translation both Luther and Calvin were indebted to Jewish assistance.

The use of the home diminished after 1609, although several continued to receive pensions for the next 150 years. The office of Warden was combined with the judicial office of Master of the Rolls.

v0_master

When Sir John Romilly was appointed Master of the Rolls in 1851, his patent of appointment professed to grant to him, for life, “the custody of the House, or Hospital, of Converts, for the habitation of the Keeper or Master of the Rolls, Books, Writs, and Records of the High Court of Chancery.”

fig04

This form of words did not appear when Sir George Jessel was appointed Master of the Rolls in 1873, or we should have had the remarkable paradox of a Jew holding the position of Keeper of the House for Converted Jews. As I have mentioned before, all trace of the Domus was abolished in 1891, except for the Chapel building, which is now part of Kings College Library. I will be leading walking tours to see it – see here

V05p163001

In 1891, on the appointment of the first Jewish Master of the Rolls, Lord Jessel, it was felt inappropriate that official responsibility for providing for Jewish Christians should be in the hands of a Jew who did not believe in Jesus, and the home was legally dissolved. It’s time we petitioned the Queen for another one!

Prayer: Thank you Lord, for this longstanding institution that provided a home and a haven for Jewish believers in Yeshua, despite the difficulties of the times in which they lived. Please raise up for us again similar testimonies of the Jewishness of Yeshua and of his followers, and provide home and shelter for those who call on the name of Yeshua for help and protection. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

2 May 2026 Jewish Disciples of Jesus Walking Tours #otdimjh

http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/london/vol1/pp551-554

https://archive.org/stream/historyofdomusco00adleiala/historyofdomusco00adleiala_djvu.txt

Posted in domus conversorum, otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

2 May 2026 Jewish Disciples of Jesus Walking Tours #otdimjh

Join us for a walk through Central London and the Jewish East End mapping the history of Jewish followers of Jesus from 1232 to the present day. We follow the route from the first Domus Conversorum (“Home of Converts”) established by King Henry III, to where the Beni Abraham (Sons of Abraham) met in 1813 in Spitalfields. We walk up Brick Lane, the heart of the historic Jewish East End. We visit the site of Palestine Place in Bethnal Green where hundreds of Jewish disciples of Jesus lived, worked and worshipped. We pass by Synagogues, Hebrew Christian institutions and famous Jewish landmarks, catching the flavour of the bustling East End of today. This tour is an ideal way to learn about the history of the Jewish people, Jewish-Christian relations and Jewish disciples of Jesus.


Details

  • Dates: May 3, 31, June 10 or contact us for upcoming dates (Midweek or Sundays on request – not all sites open on each date)
  • Duration: approx. 6 hours (including food stops and a tea debrief). Shorter tours of 1, 2 and 4 hours available.
  • Walking level: About 5 miles at relaxed pace; several short walks plus two short bus trips
  • Start: Chancery Lane underground station (Maughan Library)
  • Finish: Bethnal Green (near Town Hall Hotel / Cambridge Heath Road)/ or /Liverpool Street Station
  • Cost: pay-your-own food + TfL fares
  • Guide: Richard Harvey, PhD, student of Messianic Jewish history and theology
  • Booking: send a message with preferred dates
  • Voluntary contribution: £20 suggested (or £10 concession) to support research, planning, and future tour resources

Schedule (estimated timings)

10:00 Meet and welcome – coffee and bagels at Garbanzos (61 Fleet St, Temple, London EC4Y 1JU) (open Monday-Friday)

10:30–11:15 Stop 1: Domus Conversorum (Chancery Lane / Maughan Library)

11:15–11:45 Bus to Liverpool Street / walk into Jewish East End

11.45 Stop 2: Artillery Street / Sandys Row Synagogue/Hebrew Christian Prayer Union

12.15 Lunch (Ottolengis (contemporary Israeli)/Beigel Bake (traditional)

13.15 Stop 3: Christchurch Spitalfields (open Sundays and 10-3 Mondays/Tuesdays) for memorial plaques)

13.30 Stop 4: Beni Abraham (now Brick Lane Mosque)

14.00 Walk up Brick Lane (bookshop, Jewish buildings) and bus to Bethnal Green  

14.45 Stop 5: Site of Palestine Place (and of Mildmay Mission to the Jews, Messianic Testimony, etc)

15:15–16:00 Tea + debrief (in Bethnal Green Town Hall Hotel next to site of Palestine Place)

16:00 Close + onward travel – if travelling from Liverpool Street Station, Stop 6 – Kindertransport memorial

(We keep the pace gentle and allow time for questions, photos, and short pauses.)


The route stops

Stop 1 — Domus Conversorum (Chancery Lane / Maughan Library area)

What stood here and why it matters: The Domus Conversorum (founded 1232) was a dedicated institutional home for Jewish “converts” to Christianity—an early English attempt to formalise Jewish-Christian transition within the life of Church and Crown.

Interior view of a large room with a high wooden ceiling, decorative chandeliers, and large stained glass windows, featuring historical artifacts and furniture.


What remains / what you can see today: The medieval house is gone apart from an arch, but the chapel building in the Maughan Library, Kings College remains open as it became the headquarters of the Public Record Office, known as the ‘strong-box of the [British] Empire’


Stop 2 — Artillery Street / Sandys Row Synagogue neighbourhood (Spitalfields)

What stood here and why it matters: This district became a focal point for early 19th-century Hebrew Christian activity, and in the 1880s was surrounded by East European Jewish immigrants who created a vibrant Jewish life and culture in the East End.
What remains / what you can see today: We stand in the lanes around Sandys Row Synagogue, the oldest Ashkenazi Synagogue in the United Kingdom, and many other buildings with Jewish and Messianic Jewish connections.


Stop 3 — Christ Church Spitalfields (Commercial Street)

What stood here and why it matters: Christ Church was an Anglican anchor in a neighbourhood repeatedly transformed by migration—Huguenot, Jewish, and later Bangladeshi. Inside the church (open Sundays) there are important plaques commemorating pioneers such as Lewis Way, Alexander McCaul and Michael Solomon Alexander
What remains / what you can see today: The church’s towering presence speaks of the concern of Evangelicals in the 19th century to reach out with shelter, aid and witness, as it does today in the multicultural environment of the area.


Stop 4 — Brick Lane Mosque ( “Beni Abraham” / Episcopal Jews’ Chapel)

What stood here and why it matters: This site, original a Huguenot church that could seat more than 1,000 people, was the site of the first gathering of Jewish followers of Jesus in modern times (access with permission)
What remains / what you can see today: The building on Brick Lane is now a mosque, entry by permission. The exterior is unchanged.


Stop 5 — Palestine Place (Bethnal Green / Cambridge Heath Road area)

What stood here and why it matters: Palestine Place, headquarters of the London Society for the Promotion of Christianity Amongst the Jews (now CMJ) was the most significant 19th-century hub for Jewish missions and Hebrew Christian organisations—with a school, factory, residences and chapel in its grounds.

What remains / what you can see today: The original religious-and-institutional footprint is largely absorbed into later development, but we stand on the site and reconstruct what was here—and why it mattered—for the story of Messianic Jewish presence and witness in London.

Stop 6 — Kindertransport Memorial, Liverpool Street Station (Hope Square / main forecourt)

What stood here and why it matters: Liverpool Street was the arrival point for thousands of Kindertransport children (1938–39), and in my ongoing research I’m also tracing 200+ publicly documented cases of survivors and descendants who later identified as Jewish disciples of Jesus—showing how rescue, displacement, faith, and identity can converge across generations.

What remains / what you can see today: We stop at the Kindertransport memorial sculpture group (“Kindertransport – The Arrival”) on the station forecourt (Hope Square), and—time permitting—also point out the related “Für das Kind” memorial inside the station concourse.

Estimated costs (typical ranges)

  • TfL travel: usually Zones 1–2 for most of the day (depends on your starting point and taps)
  • Breakfast: ~£8–£15 (depending on choice)
  • Lunch: ~£5–£12 (depending on fillings/drinks)
  • Tea: ~£4–£10

Voluntary contribution

  • Suggested contribution: £20 per person (£10 concession)
    This supports research time, route development, and building a growing “Messianic Jewish London” resource base (maps, notes, and future tours). Food and travel are separate.

What to bring

  • Comfortable shoes + a light rain layer (this is London)
  • Contactless/Oyster for TfL
  • Water bottle
  • A notebook if you like capturing references and names
  • Curiosity—and a willingness to let the city tell the story slowly

Accessibility & pace

We walk at a moderate pace with frequent pauses. If you need a slower pace or more sitting breaks, tell me in advance and I’ll adjust the rhythm.


Tone, etiquette, and respect

This tour touches sensitive histories: Messianic Jewish identity, conversion, mission, contested memories, and multi-faith neighbourhood life. We approach the day with truthfulness, humility, and respect—especially around active places of worship and local communities.


Booking / interest

If you’d like to join the next date, send a message to messianicwalkingtours@gmail.com with

  • how many people,
  • any mobility/access needs,
  • and whether you’d prefer a weekday or Sunday.

(If there’s enough interest, I’ll offer two versions: a “full day” as above, and a shorter 90-minute Spitalfields/Brick Lane core.)

Posted in otdimjh | 1 Comment

1 January 1897/2026 – Hudson Taylor, John Wilkinson and 12 Years of Messianic Jewish history #otdimjh

Happy New Year to all our readers!

As “On this day in Messianic Jewish history” steps into its 12th year, with 750+ posts behind us, I’m grateful for a growing community of readers who care about the often-hidden story of Jewish followers of Yeshua—past, present and future. We trace significant events, people, institutions, and turning points, asking: How have the histories of the Church and the Jewish people shaped Jewish expressions of faith in Yeshua? And how do those legacies shape the contemporary Messianic movement today? How do Jewish disciples of Yeshua impact Jewish-Christian relations, the communities of the Church and Israel, and the realities of the world we live in?

Looking back on 2025

Israel-Gaza War

This past year has been marked by grief, uncertainty, and strain—especially under the long shadow of the Israel–Gaza war, and the way it has deepened fear, polarisation, and pain across communities. At the same time, we have also seen signs of growth and maturation in the global Messianic movement: more visibility, more serious theological work, more congregational stability in some places, and a renewed sense that Jewish faithfulness to Yeshua must be lived with integrity, humility, and responsibility.

Bondi Beach attack – Chanucah 2025

Yet alongside these developments has been a sharp reminder that the question of the Jewish people’s safety is never abstract. Antisemitism has continued to increase in the UK, and events such as the Manchester Synagogue attack on Yom Kippur have left many shaken and watchful. And beyond the UK, the horror of violence against Jews—such as the reported Bondi Beach attack in Sydney during Chanukkah—has again shown how quickly celebration can be turned into terror. In such a climate, “remembering” (zikaron) is a spiritual discipline and an act of communal faithfulness. We call to mind the Almighty’s faithfulness to Israel, the covenant that is not revoked, and the promised renewal of all creation.

An exchange of support: 1 January 1897

Hudson Taylor, dressed in Chinese costume – a radical step in contextualisation

As we begin this New Year, we remember a small but significant act of faithfulness that still speaks powerfully today—between Hudson Taylor, pioneer missionary to China and leader of the China Inland Mission, and John Wilkinson, founder of the Mildmay Mission to the Jews in London.

John Wilkinson, supporter of the early Messianic Movement

On the first day of each year, Hudson Taylor sent a donation to Wilkinson’s mission, writing on the cheque: “To the Jew first. And Wilkinson, moved by this gesture, responded in kind—sending his own cheque to Taylor’s work with the words: “And also to the Gentile.”

GeraldineGuinness

Mrs Hudson Taylor records that this “helpful interchange of sympathy” continued year after year, with each later doubling the amount. It was more than polite philanthropy. It was a living parable of Romans 1:16—not as a slogan, but as a shared commitment to honour the Almighty’s purposes for Israel and the nations, each refusing to boast over or replace the other.

Not everyone has accepted Romans 1:16 as implying an ongoing covenantal, ecclesial, eschatological and missional priority. But whatever one’s framing, this much remains unavoidable: followers of  Yeshua have a responsibility toward the Jewish people that includes repentance, reconciliation, practical solidarity, and clear, humble witness to Yeshua, the Messiah of Israel and Lord of all nations.

Please support the blog

If these posts bless you—in your own historical understanding, theological wisdom or personal relations—please consider supporting their production in four simple ways:

  1. Share posts with friends, students, leaders and fellow readers.
  2. Subscribe/follow so you don’t miss new entries.
  3. Comment on posts, ask questions, let me know what topics you are interested in.
  4. Give financially (even small monthly gifts make a real difference):
    https://www.stewardship.org.uk/partners/20477325

Prayer for the coming year

English
Lord of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as we enter this new year, crown it with Your goodness. Strengthen Your people Israel; comfort the grieving; protect the vulnerable; and turn hearts from hatred. Teach us to walk in humility and truth, to seek peace with justice, and to bear faithful witness to Yeshua the Messiah. Bless this work of remembrance, that many may see Your faithfulness across the generations.
In Yeshua’s name, Amen.

Hebrew
רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶׁל עוֹלָם, אֲנַחְנוּ נִכְנָסִים לְשָׁנָה חֲדָשָׁה—עַטֵּר אוֹתָהּ בְּטוּבֶךָ.
חַזֵּק אֶת עַמְּךָ יִשְׂרָאֵל; נַחֵם אֶת הָאֲבֵלִים; שְׁמֹר עַל הַחֲלָשִׁים; וְהָשֵׁב לֵבָבוֹת מִשִּׂנְאָה.
לַמְּדֵנוּ לָלֶכֶת בַּעֲנָוָה וּבֶאֱמֶת, לְבַקֵּשׁ שָׁלוֹם עִם צֶדֶק, וּלְהָעִיד בֶּאֱמוּנָה עַל יֵשׁוּעַ הַמָּשִׁיחַ.
בָּרֵךְ אֶת מְלֶאכֶת הַזִּכָּרוֹן הַזֹּאת, לְמַעַן יֵרָאֶה נֶאֱמָנוּתְךָ בְּכָל דּוֹר וָדוֹר.
בְּשֵׁם יֵשׁוּעַ, אָמֵן.

Transliteration
Ribbono shel olam, anachnu nichnasim le-shanah chadashah—atter otah be-tuvecha.
Chazek et amcha Yisrael; nachem et ha-avelim; shmor al ha-chalashim; ve-hashev levavot mi-sin’ah.
Lammedenu la-lechet ba’anavah u-ve’emet, levakesh shalom im tzedek, u-leha’id be’emunah al Yeshua ha-Mashiach. Barech et melechet ha-zikaron ha-zot, lema’an yera’eh ne’emanutcha be-khol dor va-dor.
B’Shem Yeshua, amen.

Screen Shot 2015-01-01 at 08.15.25

The details are recorded by Mrs Hudson Taylor here:

And her last gift to the Rev. John Wilkinson expressed the deepest interest in his work among the Jews. Work among God’s ancient people occupied a special place in the prayerful sympathy of both Mr. and Mrs. Taylor ; and Mr. John Wilkinson, founder of the Mildmay Mission to the Jews, recalled an interesting phase of their long friendship. Taking advantage of a New Year’s Day spent at home (1897), Mr. Taylor went round to Mr. Wilkinson’s house with a brotherly note enclosing a gift for the Mission. ” To the Jew first,” were the words with which the cheque was accompanied. Mr. Wilkinson’s warm heart was touched, and he immediately wrote a brotherly reply, enclosing his own cheque for the same amount, with the words : ” And also to the Gentile.” This helpful interchange of sympathy was kept up ever after, the only change being that each doubled the amount of their contribution.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is screenshot-2023-12-30-at-18.23.27-1.png

http://www.worldinvisible.com/library/hudsontaylor/hudsontaylorv2/hudsontaylorv240.htm

Posted in otdimjh | 1 Comment

25 December 1824 — Passing of Lord Eardley, MP and Palestine Place sponsor

On this day Sampson Eardley, 1st Baron Eardley (born Sampson Gideon, 10 Oct 1744), died in Brighton. A banker-politician of Jewish descent who became a Tory MP (1770–1802) and Irish peer (1789), Eardley was also a notable early patron of the London Society for Promoting Christianity amongst the Jews (LSPCJ, today CMJ). He donated the organ for the new Episcopal Jews’ Chapel at Palestine Place, Bethnal Green—opened in July 1814 as the first purpose-built place of worship in Britain for Jewish disciples of Yeshua.

Eardley’s story embodies the complex crossings of Jewish ancestry, Anglican establishment, and evangelical mission in Georgian Britain. His support for Palestine Place linked elite philanthropy to the emerging Hebrew-Christian (proto-Messianic Jewish) movement and helped root a dedicated worshipping community in London’s East End. The wider project took visible shape when the Duke of Kent laid the foundation stone of Palestine Place on 7 April 1813, before a crowd of more than 20,000 people; the chapel opened the following year, with Lewis Way, the main financial backer, also present.

Early photo of Palestine Place

Born Sampson Gideon, son of the Sephardi financier Sampson Gideon (1699–1762), he was educated at Tonbridge and Eton and was created a baronet in 1759 while still a schoolboy; later he took the surname Eardley and was raised to the Irish peerage as Baron Eardley in 1789, being elected FRS the same year. He sat in Parliament (1770–1802) for Cambridgeshire, Midhurst, Coventry, and Wallingford, and in civic and fraternal life served as Provincial Grand Master for the Cambridgeshire Freemasons from 1796. He died on 25 December 1824, and the monument in Erith to his father also records his death.

Monument to Eardley and his father at St John the Baptist Church, Erith

Palestine Place & the Jews’ Chapel

Screenshot

The LSPCJ established Palestine Place as its Bethnal Green hub with chapel, schools, printing office, and residences. The foundation stone was laid by the Duke of Kent (1813); the chapel opened July 1814. Contemporary and later histories note that the chapel contained an organ donated by Lord Eardley—a tangible sign of aristocratic backing for a dedicated congregation of Jewish Christians.

Hundreds, if not thousands, passed through the schools and factories, leading Jewish institutions such as JFS (the Jewish Free School) to follow its example. Boys, girls, young men and women learned English, trades and professions, some also becoming disciples of Yeshua.

Eardley’s renowned generosity to both Jewish and Christian causes, and his willingness to identify as Jewish despite the antisemitic attitudes of his day, mark him as a pioneer in the modern movement of Jewish disciples of Jesus, as as an example of generosity and willingness to support others less fortunate. May we echo his example today.

Brick from original buildings – Photo – Richard Harvey

Prayer (English)
God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,
we thank You for the legacy of Lord Sampson Eardley—
for his generosity toward Jewish believers in Jesus
and his support for worship and witness at Palestine Place.
Let the good he began bear fruit in our day:
strengthen congregations, raise up faithful servants,
and deepen love and peace between the Church and the people of Israel.
May his memory inspire courage, compassion, and steadfast hope.
In the name of Yeshua the Messiah. Amen.

תפילה (Hebrew)
רִבּוֹנוֹ שֶׁל עוֹלָם,
אָנוּ מוֹדִים לְךָ עַל הַיְרוּשָּׁה שֶׁל הָאָדוֹן סַמְפְּסוֹן אֵאַרְדְלִי—
עַל נְדִיבוּתוֹ לְטוֹבַת מַאֲמִינִים יְהוּדִים בְּיֵשׁוּעַ
וְעַל תְּמִיכָתוֹ בַּתְּפִלָּה וּבְעֵדוּת בְּפָלֶסְטַיְן פְּלֵיְס.
יְהִי רָצוֹן שֶׁמַּעֲשָׂיו הַטּוֹבִים יַעֲשׂוּ פְּרִי גַּם בְּיָמֵינוּ—
חַזֵּק קְהִלּוֹת, הָקֵם מְשָׁרְתִים נֶאֱמָנִים,
וְהַעֲמֵק אַהֲבָה וְשָׁלוֹם בֵּין הַכְּנֵסִיָּה וְעַם יִשְׂרָאֵל.
יְהִי זִכְרוֹ לְבְרָכָה וּלְהַשְׁרָאַת אֹמֶץ וְחֶסֶד וְתִקְוָה.
בְּשֵׁם יֵשׁוּעַ הַמָּשִׁיחַ. אָמֵן.

Transliteration
Ribbono shel olam,
anu modim lecha al hayerushah shel ha-Adon Sampson Eardley—
al nedivuto le-tovat ma’aminim Yehudim b’Yeshua
ve-al t’michto ba-tefillah u-ve’edut b’Palestine Place.
Yehi ratzon she-ma’asav ha-tovim ya’asu p’ri gam b’yameinu—
chazek kehilot, hakim m’shartim ne’emanim,
ve-ha’amek ahavah v’shalom bein ha-k’nesiyah v’am Yisrael.
Yehi zikro livrachah u-l’hashra’at ometz, chesed v’tikvah.
B’shem Yeshua ha-Mashiach. Amen.


Further reading / sources

  • History of Parliament biography: “Eardley (formerly Gideon), Sampson (1745–1824).” (Context on his political career and reputation.) (Provincial Grand Lodge of Cambridgeshire)
  • Wikipedia overview (useful dates and offices; cross-check with primary refs). (Wikipedia)
  • Curtis, R. “Evangelical Anglican Missionaries and the London Jews’ Society: Palestine Place at Bethnal Green…” Jewish Historical Studies (2019). (On 1813–14 building/opening.) (UCL Press Journals)
  • Michael Darby, chapter on the emergence of the Hebrew Christian movement (notes the organ donated by Lord Eardley). (Brill)

Posted in otdimjh | 2 Comments

25 December 4 BCE – Was Yeshua born on Christmas Day? #otdimjh

Every December, the question returns with predictable force: Was Yeshua really born on December 25? A widely shared video (circulating again this year) promises an answer “hiding in plain sight” in seven clues—census logistics, shepherds in the fields, the star, Herod, Zechariah’s priestly course, Tabernacles, and the start of Yeshua’s ministry.

As Messianic Jews, we share this instinct. We want the story to “lock” into the mo‘adim, the appointed times; we hear John’s claim that the Word “tabernacled” among us (John 1:14) and we instinctively think of Sukkot – the Feast of Tabernacles. There is nothing wrong with letting the feasts form our imagination. The problem comes when we turn typology into a timetable, and devotion into a date.

Historical scholarship—Jewish, Christian, and secular—does not yield a “true date” of Yeshua’s birth in the sense the video claims. It can, at best, offer a probable range of years and then confess (with some humility) that the month and day are not recoverable from our sources.

What we can say with some confidence: the year is a range

Most reconstructions begin where Matthew begins: “in the days of Herod the king.” (Matthew 2:1). That pushes us into the final years of Herod the Great. A long-standing scholarly majority places Herod’s death in 4 BCE, and in that case Yeshua’ birth must be earlier (often placed roughly 6–4 BCE, depending on how one correlates other data). 

But even here, caution is warranted. The date of Herod’s death is debated, with a serious minority arguing for 1 BCE, which (if adopted) shifts the window. 

So the first “hidden clue” the video treats as settled (“Herod died in 4 BC, therefore…”) is already sitting on contested ground.

The census and the shepherds: plausible impressions, not chronological proof

The video’s opening move is rhetorical: “The Romans wouldn’t do a winter census; therefore Yeshua wasn’t born in winter.” Yet Luke’s census note is one of the most contested chronological features in the infancy narratives. There is ongoing debate over what Luke is doing historically and literarily with the Quirinius reference, and recent journal work argues Luke’s census motif may be doing theological signalling as much as (or more than) administrative dating. 

Likewise, “shepherds in the fields” is regularly pressed into service as if it were a weather report. But as Andrew Steinmann has recently argued in detail, several favourite “data points” (including appeals to shepherding practice and priestly-course math) simply cannot bear the weight placed upon them when people try to deduce a specific birth date from them. 

None of this means the video’s intentions are wicked or foolish. It means they are overconfident. The move from “December is unlikely” to “therefore September/October is proved” is a leap over a chasm of assumptions.

The priestly courses: a clock with missing gears

The most “technical” part of the video is the claim that Zechariah’s division (Abijah) (Luke 1:5) lets us calculate John’s conception in June, then Yeshua’s conception six months later, then Yeshua’s birth nine months after that—landing neatly in September/October, conveniently near Sukkot.

This is attractive because it feels mathematical. But the “math” depends on what we do not have: a securely reconstructible priestly rotation for a particular year, mapped cleanly onto the calendar, with no disruptions and no uncertainties. This is precisely the kind of argument Steinmann cautions against: it sounds like precision, but it is precision purchased on credit. To reconcile Jewish calendars (Pharisees, Sadducees, Josephus, etc) is a major challenge for Jewish and Christian scholars.

“Tabernacled among us”: glorious theology, not a hidden timestamp

Here the video is at its most homiletically compelling: John 1:14 says the Word became flesh and “dwelt” among us—eskēnōsen, “tabernacled.” Surely, then, Yeshua was born at Sukkot?

As proclamation, this sings. As proof, it fails. John is not writing a calendar; he is announcing that the God of Israel has pitched his tent in the midst of his people in the Messiah. The word is chosen for theological density, not because John is whispering a date to readers willing to do enough arithmetic.

David Ford’s new commentary – highly recommended!

In other words: Sukkot is a beautiful lens for the incarnation. It is not a reliable anchor for chronology.

December 25 and Sol Invictus: the “pagan takeover” story is too neat

The video repeats the common claim: the idea that the date of December 25 for Christmas was intentionally chosen to overwrite or appropriate the Roman festival of Dies Natalis Solis Invicti (Birthday of the Unconquered Sun). This is a subject of historical debate, with many modern scholars arguing against it

Yes, the Chronography of 354 is a key witness for what Rome was marking in late antiquity, including December 25 traditions. 

But the relationship between Christian dating and solar festivals is not a simple one-way “replacement.” Steven Hijmans has argued that the evidential basis for the popular “Sol Invictus → Christmas” storyline is often thinner than people assume. 

And C. Philipp E. Nothaft has shown that early Christian calendrical reasoning (computistical traditions and symbolic chronologies) is part of the story—so that “pagan borrowing” is not the only, nor necessarily the best, explanation. 

So where does that leave us?

A Messianic Jewish way of holding the question

We can say, without embarrassment: the New Testament does not tell us the date, and responsible history cannot fabricate what the sources do not give.

We can also say: it is entirely possible that Yeshua was born in the autumn. It is also possible he was not. The point is not to banish the question, but to refuse false certainty. The real issue is not ‘when was he born?’ but ‘is he truly the Messiah?’

And we can say something more Jewish still: the feasts are not primarily an escape-room puzzle. They are God’s gift of time—training Israel (and through Israel, the nations) to inhabit the world as worship. If Sukkot helps you adore the mystery that God has drawn near and “camped” among us in Yeshua, then receive that as grace. Just don’t turn it into an internet-proof that condemns other believers for celebrating on December 25.

Because the deepest “precision” here is not the date, but the faithfulness: “When the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son” (Gal 4:4). Fullness is not the same thing as a timestamp.

English: Happy Christmas – the Feast of the Birth of the Messiah Yeshua!

חַג שָׂמֵחַ לְחַג הוּלֶדֶת הַמָּשִׁיחַ יֵשׁוּעַ!

Chag sameach le-chag huledet ha-Mashiach Yeshua!


Prayer

God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, give us love for truth without pride, and zeal without the need to win. Teach us to honour your appointed times without forcing them to say what you have not said. Let the light of Messiah shine in our homes this season—whenever we mark it—and make us gentle witnesses to the One who came near. Amen.

Hebrew

אָבִינוּ מַלְכֵּנוּ, תֵּן לָנוּ חָכְמָה וַעֲנָוָה; אֱמֶת בְּלֹא גַּאֲוָה, וּקִנְאָה לְשִׁמְךָ בְּלֹא מַחֲלוֹקֶת. לַמְּדֵנוּ לְכַבֵּד אֶת מוֹעֲדֶיךָ בְּלִי לְהוֹסִיף מַה שֶּׁלֹּא אָמַרְתָּ. הָאֵר בָּנוּ אוֹר הַמָּשִׁיחַ וַעֲשֵׂנוּ עֵדִים עֲנָוִים לְעִמָּנוּ אֵל. אָמֵן.

Transliteration

Avinu Malkeinu, ten lanu chochmah va’anavah; emet b’lo ga’avah, u’qin’ah l’shimkha b’lo machaloket. Lamdenu l’chabed et mo’adeikha b’li l’hosif mah she-lo amarta. Ha’er banu or haMashiach, v’aseinu edim anavim l’Imanu El. Amen.


References for further reading

https://hebrew4christians.com/Holidays/Winter_Holidays/Christmas/christmas.html

https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195393361/obo-9780195393361-0251.xml

Marshak, Adam Kolman. The Many Faces of Herod the Great. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.

https://www.ccel.org/ccel/edersheim/lifetimes.xi.vii.html

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment