7 December 1965 Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel alongside Martin Luther King #otdimjh

heschel king

Heschel, presenting Judaism and World Peace Award to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., December 7, 1965

Dr. King and Rabbi Heschel worked together in the battle for civil rights, social justice and peace. Heschel marched alongside King in Selma, Alabama, demanding voting rights for African Americans. King supported Heschel, who was one of the first religious leaders in the U.S. to speak out against the escalating war in Viet Nam. They combined the deepest traditionsof their Jewish and Christian faiths with activism for social change. After marching with Dr. King in the Selma civil rights march, Rabbi Heschel said;“I felt my legs were praying.”

Selma Heschel March

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., fourth from right, walking alongside Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, second from right, in the Selma civil rights march on March 21, 1965

Heschel practiced what he called “radical amazement” in his work with religious others. “The opposite of good is not evil,” he said, “it is indifference.”

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

“In a free society, when evil is done, some are guilty, but all are responsible.” Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel

heschel.king_

Abraham Joshua Heschel was a Polish-born American rabbi and one of the leading Jewish theologians and Jewish philosophers of the 20th century.

He was descended from preeminent European rabbis on both sides of the family. His great-great-grandfather and namesake was Rebbe Avraham Yehoshua Heshel of Apt. His father, Moshe Mordechai Heschel, died of influenza in 1916. His mother Reizel Perlow was also a descendant of Avraham Yehoshua Heshel and other Hasidic dynasties. He was the youngest of six children. His siblings were Sarah, Dvora Miriam, Esther Sima, Gittel, and Jacob.

Screen Shot 2014-12-06 at 14.30.38

After a traditional yeshiva education and studying for Orthodox rabbinical ordinationsemicha, he pursued his doctorate at the University of Berlin and a liberal rabbinic ordination at the Hochschule für die Wissenschaft des Judentums. There he studied under some of the finest Jewish educators of the time: Chanoch Albeck, Ismar Elbogen, Julius Guttmann, and Leo Baeck. Heschel later taught Talmud there. He joined a Yiddish poetry group, Jung Vilna, and in 1933, published a volume of Yiddish poems, Der Shem Hamefoyrosh: Mentsch, dedicated to his father.

Susann1

In late October 1938, when he was living in a rented room in the home of a Jewish family in Frankfurt, he was arrested by the Gestapo and deported to Poland. He spent ten months lecturing on Jewish philosophy and Torah at Warsaw’s Institute for Jewish Studies. Six weeks before the German invasion of Poland, Heschel left Warsaw for London with the help of Julian Morgenstern, president of Hebrew Union College, who had been working to obtain visas for Jewish scholars in Europe.

God-in-Search-cover

Heschel’s sister Esther was killed in a German bombing. His mother was murdered by the Nazis, and two other sisters, Gittel and Devorah, died in Nazi concentration camps. He never returned to Germany, Austria or Poland. He once wrote, “If I should go to Poland or Germany, every stone, every tree would remind me of contempt, hatred, murder, of children killed, of mothers burned alive, of human beings asphyxiated.”

Heschel arrived in New York City in March 1940. He served on the faculty of Hebrew Union College (HUC), the main seminary of Reform Judaism, in Cincinnati for five years. In 1946, he took a position at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America (JTS), the main seminary of Conservative Judaism, where he served as professor of Jewish ethics and Mysticism until his death in 1972. Heschel married Sylvia Straus, a concert pianist, on December 10, 1946, in Los Angeles. Their daughter, Susannah Heschel, is a Jewish scholar in her own right..

1sabbathheschel

Heschel explored many facets of Jewish thought including studies on medieval Jewish philosophy, Kabbalah, and Hasidism. According to some scholars, he was more interested in spirituality than in critical text study, which was a specialty of many scholars at JTS. He was not given a graduate assistant for many years and was relegated to teach mainly in the education school or Rabbinical school, not in the academic graduate program. Heschel became quite friendly with his colleague Mordecai Kaplan. Though they differed in their approach to Judaism they had a very cordial relationship and visited in each other’s homes from time to time.

Heschel saw the teachings of the Hebrew prophets as a clarion call for social action in the United States and worked for black civil rights and against the Vietnam War. Heschel was an activist for civil rights in the United States.

heschel-in-office

Heschel is a widely read Jewish theologian whose most influential works include Man is Not Alone, God in Search of Man, The Sabbath, and The Prophets. At the Vatican Council II, as representative of American Jews, Heschel persuaded the Roman Catholic Church to eliminate or modify passages in its liturgy that demeaned the Jews, or expected their conversion to Christianity. His theological works argued that religious experience is a fundamentally human impulse, not just a Jewish one, and that no religious community could claim a monopoly on religious truth.

Prayer: O God of Mercy and of Justice, thank you for the inspiring example of these contemporary Prophets, Heschel and King. May their example of passionate political engagement linked to deep study and commitment to your Word inspire us. Help us not to avoid stepping into the difficult political issues of our day. Challenge us through their example to speak out, step up and walk on to create societies where your standards are known, shown and lived out in a needy world. Help Messianic Jews especially, inheritors of both Jewish and Christian traditions, to give a prophetic challenges to the deep-rooted injustices in our societies. In Yeshua’s name. Amen.

Sources:

http://www.onbeing.org/program/spiritual-audacity-abraham-joshua-heschel/227/audio?embed=1

http://www.onbeing.org/program/spiritual-audacity-abraham-joshua-heschel/transcript/4951#main_content

http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/public/resources-ideas/cj/classics/heschel/theological-affinities-in-the-writings-o.pdf

https://m.facebook.com/AJHeschel?v=info&expand=1

Quotes:

“Racism is man’s gravest threat to man—the maximum hatred for a minimum reason.”

“All it takes is one person … and another … and another … and another … to start a movement.”

“Wonder rather than doubt is the root of all knowledge.”

“A religious man is a person who holds God and man in one thought at one time, at all times, who suffers harm done to others, whose greatest passion is compassion, whose greatest strength is love and defiance of despair.”

” God is either of no importance, or of supreme importance.”

“Just to be is a blessing. Just to live is holy.”

“Self-respect is the fruit of discipline, the sense of dignity grows with the ability to say no to oneself.”

“Life without commitment is not worth living.”

“Above all, the prophets remind us of the moral state of a people: Few are guilty, but all are responsible.”

“Remember that there is a meaning beyond absurdity. Be sure that every little deed counts, that every word has power. Never forget that you can still do your share to redeem the world in spite of all absurdities and frustrations and disappointments.”

“When I was young, I admired clever people. Now that I am old, I admire kind people.”

“Awareness of symbolic meaning is awareness of a specific idea; kavanah is awareness of an ineffable situation.

“A Jew is asked to take a leap of action rather than a leap of thought.”

“Speech has power. Words do not fade. What starts out as a sound, ends in a deed.”

“The Almighty has not created the universe that we may have opportunities to satisfy our greed, envy and ambition.”

“The higher goal of spiritual living is not to amass a wealth of information, but to face sacred moments.”

“The course of life is unpredictable … no one can write his autobiography in advance.”

“When I marched in Selma, my legs were praying.”

“Build your life as if it was a work of art”

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

December 6 Father Christmas (Saint Nicholas/Santa Claus) and the Jews #otdimjh

stc

Bah! Humbug! What has Father Christmas to do with being Jewish, or being a Jewish believer in Yeshua? Well, today is the Feast of Saint Nicholas, and throughout history we have had a love-hate relationship of fascination, fear and friendship with this 3rd century saint, who became in popular imagination the Sinterklaas (Dutch) and Santa of today.

Screen Shot 2014-12-05 at 10.01.20

St. Nicholas is the Saint better known as “Santa Claus” (Sinterklaas in the Dutch whence “Santa Claus” comes). His image in America has been mixed up with a lot of traits and imagery from sources as disparate as the poetry of Clement Moore, pagan Norse mythology, and American advertising. In real life, though, St. Nicholas was a beloved and wonderful Bishop of Myra (in modern-day Turkey). He was born in Asia Minor in A.D. 260 and orphaned at an early age.st2
As a young man, he made a pilgrimage to Palestine and Egypt, becoming a Bishop upon his return. He was imprisoned during the persecutions of Diocletian, but was released after Constantine came to rule. According to legend, he was present at the Council of Nicaea and became so incensed at Arius — the heretical Bishop whose denial of the two natures of Christ spread through the Church — that he slapped him across the face. He intervened twice in cases in which innocent men were accused of crimes they did not commit, once appearing to Constantine and the local prefect in a dream, encouraging them to do the right thing in their regard.goldenlegendorli03jaco_0009

Many stories about his life indicate his kindness and reveal miracles. The Golden Legend, written in A.D. 1275 by Jacobus de Voragine, Archbishop of Genoa, tells us how St. Nicholas saved sailors from a tempest:

It is read in a chronicle that, the blessed Nicholas was at the Council of Nice; and on a day, as a ship with mariners were in perishing on the sea, they prayed and required devoutly Nicholas, servant of God, saying: If those things that we have heard of thee said be true, prove them now.

And anon a man appeared in his likeness, and said: Lo! see ye me not? ye called me, and then he began to help them in their exploit of the sea, and anon the tempest ceased.

And when they were come to his church, they knew him without any man to show him to them, and yet they had never seen him. And then they thanked God and him of their deliverance. And he bade them to attribute it to the mercy of God, and to their belief, and nothing to his merits. 

jews-did-christmas-art
The Golden Legend also gives us the story of a Jewish man who was robbed, and how St. Nicholas used the event imitate Christ, thereby not only bringing the Jewish man to Christ, but causing the thieves to repent:

Another Jew saw the virtuous miracles of St. Nicholas, and did do make an image of the saint, and set it in his house, and commanded him that he should keep well his house when he went out, and that he should keep well all his goods, saying to him: Nicholas, lo! here be all my goods, I charge thee to keep them, and if thou keep them not well, I shall avenge me on thee in beating and tormenting thee.

440px-Icon_c_1500_St_Nicholas

And on a time, when the Jew was out, thieves came and robbed all his goods, and left, unborne away, only the image. And when the Jew came home he found him robbed of all his goods. He areasoned the image saying these words: Sir Nicholas, I had set you in my house for to keep my goods from thieves, wherefore have ye not kept them? Ye shall receive sorrow and torments, and shall have pain for the thieves. I shall avenge my loss, and subdue my madness in beating thee.

And then took the Jew the image, and beat it, and tormented it cruelly. Then happed a great marvel, for when the thieves departed the goods, the holy saint, like as he had been in his array, appeared to the thieves, and said to them: Wherefore have I been beaten so cruelly for you and have so many torments? See how my body is hewed and broken; see how that the red blood runneth down by my body; go ye fast and restore it again, or else the ire of God Almighty shall make you as to be one out of his wit, and that all men shall know your felony, and that each of you shall be hanged.

And they said: Who art thou that sayest to us such things? And he said to them: I am Nicholas the servant of Jesu Christ, whom the Jew hath so cruelly beaten for his goods that ye bare away.

Then they were afeard, and came to the Jew, and heard what he had done to the image, and they told him the miracle, and delivered to him again all his goods. And thus came the thieves to the way of truth, and the Jew to the way of Jesu Christ.

img_2167

Some Messianic Jews have little time for Santa, and see him as a great distortion and distraction from the message of Yeshua, and as part of the ‘Christmas’ industry which has nothing to do with the true meaning of the Messiah. See Jonathan Cahn’s teaching here.

santa-121412 jewish

But others, such as this Orthodox Jewish attorney in New York , dress up as Santa to take presents to the families of those fireman who lost their lives in the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Centre.

Jewish-Santa-Claus-224x300

Prayer: Whatever our views on Santa today, we thank you for the opportunity to share in the common love and generosity of this season. Thank you for the life and legend of this ancient man of God, around whom so much popular mystique and commercialization has grown up. May the real reason for the season be the knowledge of God’s love for Israel and the nations through the coming of Yeshua, and in His name we pray that we too may have that love and generosity to all that you have for us. Amen.

Sources:

http://www.fisheaters.com/customsadvent3.html

http://forward.com/articles/167577/when-santa-at-the-mall-is-jewish/?p=all

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Nicholas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy7fb7tQepQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXJJ9b7ncRo

http://www.kveller.com/parent/home-and-community/jews-who-did-christmas.shtml

http://saints.sqpn.com/the-golden-legend-the-life-of-saint-nicholas/

From The Golden Legend:

There was a man that had borrowed of a Jew a sum of money, and sware upon the altar of Saint Nicholas that he would render and pay it again as soon as he might, and gave none other pledge. And this man held this money so long, that the Jew demanded and asked his money, and he said that he had paid him. Then the Jew made him to come tofore the law in judgment, and the oath was given to the debtor. And he brought with him an hollow staff, in which he had put the money in gold, and he leant upon the staff. And when he should make his oath and swear, he delivered his staff to the Jew to keep and hold whilst he should swear, and then sware that he had delivered to him more than he ought to him. And when he had made the oath, he demanded his staff again of the Jew, and he nothing knowing of his malice delivered it to him. Then this deceiver went his way, and anon after, him list sore to sleep, and laid him in the way, and a cart with four wheels came with great force and slew him, and brake the staff with gold that it spread abroad. And when the Jew heard this, he came thither sore moved, and saw the fraud, and many said to him that he should take to him the gold; and he refused it, saying, But if he that was dead were not raised again to life by the merits of Saint Nicholas, he would not receive it, and if he came again to life, he would receive baptism and become Christian. Then he that was dead arose, and the Jew was christened.

Another Jew saw the virtuous miracles of Saint Nicholas, and did do make an image of the saint, and set it in his house, and commanded him that he should keep well his house when he went out, and that he should keep well all his goods, saying to him: Nicholas, lo! here be all my goods, I charge thee to keep them, and if thou keep them not well, I shall avenge me on thee in beating and tormenting thee. And on a time, when the Jew was out, thieves came and robbed all his goods, and left, unborne away, only the image. And when the Jew came home he found him robbed of all his goods. He areasoned the image saying these words: Sir Nicholas, I had set you in my house for to keep my goods from thieves, wherefore have ye not kept them? Ye shall receive sorrow and torments, and shall have pain for the thieves. I shall avenge my loss, and refrain my woodness in beating thee. And then took the Jew the image, and beat it, and tormented it cruelly. Then happed a great marvel, for when the thieves departed the goods, the holy saint, like as he had been in his array, appeared to the thieves, and said to them: Wherefore have I been beaten so cruelly for you and have so many torments? See how my body is hewed and broken; see how that the red blood runneth down by my body; go ye fast and restore it again, or else the ire of God Almighty shall make you as to be one out of his wit, and that all men shall know your felony, and that each of you shall be hanged. And they said: Who art thou that sayest to us such things? And he said to them: I am Nicholas the servant of Jesu Christ, whom the Jew hath so cruelly beaten for his goods that ye bare away. Then they were afeard, and came to the Jew, and heard what he had done to the image, and they told him the miracle, and delivered to him again all his goods. And thus came the thieves to the way of truth, and the Jew to the way of Jesu Christ.

http://saintwiki.com/index.php?title=The_Golden_Legend

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

5 December 633 Isidore of Seville convenes Fourth Council of Toledo against Jews and Jewish Christians #otdimjh

440px-Isidor_von_Sevilla

Isidore of Seville (c. 560 – 4 April 636) was Archbishop of Seville for more than three decades and is considered “the last scholar of the ancient world”. Amidst the disintegration of classical culture, and the increase of violence and illiteracy, he worked to convert the Arian Visigoths to Catholicism.

Isidore’s De fide catholica contra Iudaeos furthers Augustine of Hippo’s ideas on the Jewish presence in Christian society. Like Augustine, Isidore accepted the necessity of the Jewish presence because of their expected role in the anticipated Second Coming of Christ. Isidore exceeds the anti-rabbinic polemics of earlier theologians by criticizing Jewish practice as deliberately disingenuous.

Isidore of Seville2

His fame after his death was based on his Etymologiae, an etymological encyclopedia which assembled extracts of many books from classical antiquity that would have otherwise been lost.

440px-Toledo_Cathedral,_from_Plaza_del_Ayuntamiento

Isidore convened the Fourth of Eighteen Councils held in Toledo between 400 and 702. At an old man of more than 70, he presided over its deliberations and originated most enactments of the council.

He contributed two of the many decisions to the Fourth Council of Toledo:

  • Canon 60 calling for the forced removal of children from parents practicing Crypto-Judaism and their education by Christians
  • Canon 65 forbidding Jews and Christians of Jewish origin from holding public office.

In addition

  • In future no Jew should be baptized by force, but those who were once baptized were not permitted to return to Judaism.
  • Whoever protected the Jews was threatened with excommunication.
  • Jews married to Christians must accept baptism or else divorce.

Prayer: Father, forgive the oppression carried out in your name by those such as Isidore. Cleanse the memories of the past by filling us with repentance, confession love, mercy and forgiveness. How could those who affirmed you as Lord and Saviour in the beauty of their theological formulations at the same time desecrate your name amongst your people Israel through such atrocious abuses of power? Have mercy, O Lord, have mercy upon us all! In Yeshua’ name we pray – may his reconciling love restore and heal. Amen.

Sources: Wolfram Drews, The Unknown Neighbour: the Jew in the Thought of Isidore of Seville (Leiden: Brill, 2006): 31.

Bat-Sheva Albert – Isidore of Seville : his attitude towards Judaism and his impact on early medieval canon law.

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1454969?uid=2134&uid=3738032&uid=2473449213&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=2473449203&uid=60&sid=21104753476911

https://www.christianhistoryinstitute.org/it-happened-today/12/5/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isidore_of_Seville

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1454969?uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104758198091

Screen Shot 2014-12-04 at 21.49.05

LXVI

Ex decreto gloriosissimi principis hoc sanctum elegit concilium, ut Iudeis non liceat christianos servos nec christiana mancipia emere, nec cuiusquam consequi largitatem, nefas est enim, ut membra Christi, serviant Antichristi ministris. Quod si deinceps servos christianos vel ancillas Iudęi habere praesumpserint, sublati ab eorum dominatu, libertatem a principe consequantur.

LVII

De Iudeis autem praecepit sancta synodus, nemini deinceps ad credendum vim inferre. Cui enim vult deus miseretur, et quem vult indurat. Non enim tales inviti salvandi sunt, sed volentes ut integra sit forma iustitiae. Sicut enim homo propria arbitrii voluntate serpenti oboediens periit, sic vocante se gratia dei propriae mentis conversione homo quisque credendo salvatur. Ergo non vi sed libera arbitrii facultate ut convertantur suadendi sunt non potius impellendi. Qui autem iam pridem ad christianitatem coacti sunt, sicut factum est temporibus religiosissimi principis [f]Sisebuti quia iam constat eos sacramentis divinis adsociatos, et baptismi gratiam suscepisse, et chrismate unctos esse, et corporis domini et sanguinis extitisse [g] participes, oportet ut fidem etiam quam vi vel necessitate susceperunt tenere cogantur, ne nomen domini blasphemetur, et fides quam susceperunt, vilis ac contemptibilis habeatur.

LVIII

Tanta est quorundam cupiditas, ut quidam eam appetentes iuxta quod ait apostolus etiam a fide erraverint. Multi quippe hucusque ex sacerdotibus atque laicis ||fol. 76va|| accipientes a Iudeis munera perfidiam eorum patrocinio suo fovent [i]. Qui non inmerito ex corpore Antichristi esse noscuntur, quia contra Christum faciunt. Quicumque igitur deinceps episcopus sive clericus sive saecularis illis contra fidem christianam suffragium vel munere vel favore prestiterit, aut propter aetatem, vere ut profanus et sacrilegus anathema effectus, ab ecclesia catholica, et regno dei efficiatur extraneus. Quia dignum est ut a corpore Christi separetur, qui inimicis Christi patronus efficitur.

LVIIII

Plerique qui ex Iudeis dudum ad christianam fidem promoti sunt, nunc blasphemantes Christo, non solum Iudaicos ritus perpetrasse noscuntur, sed etiam abominandas circumcisiones exercere presumpserunt. De quibus consultu piissimi ac religiosissimi domini nostri Sisenandi regis, hoc sanctum decrevit concilium, ut huiusmodi transgressores pontificali auctoritate correcti ad cultum christiani dogmatis revocentur. Ut quos voluntas propria non emendat, animadversio sacerdotalis coerceat. Eos autem quos circumciderunt, si filii eorum sunt a parentum consortio separentur, si servi pro iniuria corporis sui libertati tradantur.

LX

Iudeorum filios vel filias ne parentum ultra involvantur erroribus ab eorum consortio separari decernimus. Deputatos aut monasteriis aut christianis viris ac mulieribus deum timentibus ut sub eorum conversatione, cultum fidei discant, atque in melius instituti, tam in moribus quam in fide proficiant.

LXI

Iudei baptizati, si postea prevaricantes [n] in Christum qualibet poena damnati extiterint, a rebus eorum fideles filios excludi non oportebit. Quia scriptum est: Filius non portabit patris iniquitatem.

LXII

Saepe malorum consortia, etiam bonos corrumpunt, quanto magis eos qui ad vitia proni sunt. Nulla igitur ultra communio sit Hebreis ad fidem christianam translatis cum his qui adhuc in veteri ritu consistunt, ne forte eorum participio subvertantur. Quicumque igitur amodo ex his qui baptizati sunt infidelium consortia non vitaverint, et hi christianis donentur, et illi publicis cedibus||fol. 76vb|| deputentur.

LXIII

Iudei qui christianas mulieres in coniugio habent, ammoneantur ab episcopo civitatis ipsius, ut si cum eis permanere cupiunt christiani efficiantur. Quod si ammoniti noluerint, separentur. Quia non potest infidelis in eius permanere coniunctione, quae iam in christianam translata est fidem. Filii autem qui ex talibus nati existunt, fidem atque conditionem matris sequantur. Similiter et hi qui procreati sunt de infidelibus mulieribus et fidelibus viris, christianam sequantur religionem non Iudaicam superstitionem.

LXIIII

Non potest erga homines esse fidelis, qui deo extiterit infidelis. Iudei ergo qui dudum christiani effecti sunt et nunc Christi [r] fidem praevaricati sunt, ad testimonium dicendum admitti non debent, quamvis esse se christianos adnuntient. Quia sicut in fide Christi suspecti [s] sunt, ita in testimonio humano dubii habentur. Infirmari ergo oportet eorum testimonium qui in fide falsi docentur, nec eis esse credendum qui veritatis a se fidem abiecerunt.

LXV

Precipiente domino atque excellentissimo Sisenando [u] rege, id constituit sanctum concilium, ut Iudęi aut hi qui ex Iudęis sunt officia publica nullatenus appetant, quia sub hac occasione christianis iniuriam faciunt. Ideoque iudices provintiarum cum sacerdotibus eorum subreptiones fraudulenter relictas suspendant, et officia publica eos agere non permittant. Si quis autem hoc permiserit, velut in sacrilegum excommunicatio proferatur, et is qui subpresserit publicis caedibus deputetur [v].

LXVI

Ex decreto gloriosissimi principis hoc sanctum elegit concilium, ut Iudeis non liceat christianos servos nec christiana mancipia emere, nec cuiusquam consequi largitatem, nefas est enim, ut membra Christi, serviant Antichristi ministris. Quod si deinceps servos christianos vel ancillas Iudęi habere praesumpserint, sublati ab eorum dominatu, libertatem a principe consequantur.

http://www.benedictus.mgh.de/quellen/chga/chga_046t.htm

Quick Google translation – needs checking

57 [E].

Concerning the Jews the holy synod commands, however, were never in the future be forced to believe. For he that hath the God wants to have mercy, and whom he will he hardens. For such are not saved against their will, but wishing to be a form of justice may be whole. In obedience to the will of the serpent just as a man’s own is lost, so is a man who calls, each one his own soul in the grace of God by believing that he is saved. Therefore, they are not to be converted, not by force, but rather must be impelled is the faculty of free will. But those who were compelled to in Christendom as has already been this long time, as it was in the times of the most religious of the prince of [f] because it is already clear that the sacraments of the divine associated Sisebuti, and received the grace of baptism, and was anointed with chrism, and of the body and blood of the Lord, was proved [G] share, it is necessary in order to are compelled to keep the faith they received even greater than the force or necessity, lest the name of the Lord be blasphemed, and the faith of which we received, is to be considered vile and contemptible.

58 [H].

So great is the desire of some people, according to some, according to her coveted after, they have erred from the faith, too, what the apostle says. For many priests and lay people from the hitherto || sol. 76va || Jews taking bribes to have described his patronage to foster [i]. Those who do not are known to have good reason to be out of the body of Antichrist, because it is against Christ, they do. As many of the Christian faith, therefore, the future bishop of the vote or a clerk or an office, either for favor, whether secular verbal incitement against them, or because of their age, in order to profane, and of a truth, the wicked to be an anathema of the effect, from the Catholic Church, and in the kingdom of God, he becomes a stranger. In order to be separated from the body of Christ, because it is better, who is the patron of the enemies of Christ is brought about.

59 [K].

Most people who have been promoted from the Jews to the Christian faith a little while ago, they are now, speaking evil of Christ, not only to the Jewish ritual, are known to have committed, but also abominable acts presumed to exercise circumcisions. With the advice of the most religious and sacred place of our lord the king, concerning the things whereof Sisenand, decreed that it is a holy gathering, so this kind of correction, to the exercise of the Christian dogma of the transgressors of his pontifical authority, to be restored. In order that those whom one’s own will benefit us, no awareness of the priestly does. Those, whom he had circumcised, they are from the children, and their parents if separated from the communion, because of the injury of his body, if the freedom of the slaves may be presented.

60 [L].

No longer involved in their errors of the Jews from their company of their parents, lest the daughters of the children of separated or decree. For those who fear God, or monasteries, or Christians, men and women assigned to the work that they are under their way of life, the service of the faith, they may learn, and for the better of the institute, as well as in the faith, in the manners, they make progress.

61 [m].

The Jews, they were baptized, if at a later prevaricantes [n] in Christ, have been condemned to the punishment of any kind, be excluded from the things of the children of the faithful of them will not be right. Because it is written, the Son is not the Father, he shall bear his iniquity.

62 [O]

Often, the company of the wicked, corrupt, even good, how much more will those who are prone to vice. There is, therefore it is no more a communion of the Hebrews to the Christian faith, along with those who are still in the old rite, they are transferred, they should not, perhaps, their participle overthrown. Therefore, when any of them that henceforth they were baptized unbelievers vitaverint company, and these are granted to Christians, and those of the public slaughter || sol. || 76vb outstanding.

63 [P].

The Jews who are in the marriage of Christian women have, by the bishop of the city of the same into ourselves, to remain with them so that if they wish to become Christians. But if you do not want to, admonished, may be separated. Because they did not remain faithful to his can be an unbeliever in the union, which have already been transferred to the Christian faith. But the children of those who were born out of such things come into existence, and the condition of the mother’s faith may follow. In like manner these men, who were begotten of the faithful who are not of the women, and the unbelievers, the Christian religion did not follow the Jewish superstition.

64 [q].

It is impossible for men to be faithful, who by God’s will exist to be an unbeliever. Now, therefore, that a while ago the Jews of Christ, Christians have been made, and [R] have transgressed against the faith, ought not to be admitted to the testimony: it must be said, even though that they were Christians and let them tell. For like as we are in the faith of Christ, are suspected of [s], and thus, in the testimony of the human has a doubt. Becomes ill, who are in faith of what is false, therefore, their testimony must be taught to do this, they must be thought of truth from themselves, the faith of those who rejected them.

65 [T].

Enjoining, as to the Lord, and a most excellent Sisenando [U] the king, that he made the holy council, in order that the Jews, the Jews, who is one of the duties of the State or the latter in no way desired is that the Christians of this occasion, under the wrong they do. Therefore judges province with priests abandoned their violent fraudulently suspend public services do not allow them. If any man have this permission, I will be excommunicated as being guilty of sacrilege, and the slaughter of the public is to be appointed that is called a subpresserit [V]

66 [W].

From the decree of the most glorious of the prince of this holy council has chosen, so that the servants of the Jews, nor the Christians are not allowed to buy the Christian slaves, nor the bestowal of any one, it is illegal, as stated by the members of Christ, serve the servants of Antichrist. But if for granted in the future to have the servants of the Jews, Christians, or his maid, that was removed from their dominion, obtain the freedom of the one from the ruler.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

4 December 1888 Mirza Norollah returns to Tehran to share faith in home synagogue #otdimjh

 

88947-Mirza Norollah_Persia

Mirza Norollah 1855-1925

Gidney records “And so it came to pass that Mirza Norollah, a native Jew of Tehran (whose father was a physician to the Shah), converted to the faith of Christ, baptized and trained in the Society’s College, was sent out to take charge of the mission in 1888. He arrived at Tehran on December 4th, and was well received by his friends and relatives. Many came to him to hear an account of his journeys and experiences. On the first Saturday after his arrival he went to his father’s synagogue, which all his relatives attended. The portion of Scripture for that day was taken from Ezekiel xxxvii. After it had been read, he asked to be allowed to talk to the people about it, and, permission being granted, he read the passage again in Hebrew and in Persian, and then proclaimed to them the crucified Jesus as their Messiah and Redeemer.”

Norollah (also Nurullah) came to faith as a young man in the early 1880s after reading a Bible given to his father by Aaron Stern.

350085-Stern cmj

He left Persia in search of Stern, who by then was leading the work at Hebrew College at Palestine Place, London.  Stern clearly remembered visiting the Norollah home and presenting the New Testament to the Court Physician He was overjoyed to see the result of this gift and, on his advice, Mirza was trained in the London Society’s college. Norollah studied and trained until 1888, when he returned to Teheran to take up the work of CMJ.  On his arrival he read in his father’s synagogue, where all his family attended prayers, from the appointed lesson of the day, Ezekiel 37, and spoke of Jesus as the Messiah of Israel. His eldest brother came to faith just weeks after Mirza returned to Persia.  Many others of his family followed, included his nephew, Jollynoos, who later became his right hand in the work of CMJ in Persia.

Norollah established a book shop, schools, regular Sunday services for Jewish believers, and evangelistic meetings on Shabbat – first in Tehran and then also in Isfahan. He visited the Jews in their home, and continued to preach the Messiah in the synagogues.  In Hamadan the Chief Rabbi allowed him to preach in his synagogue on Shabbat.

In 1890 Norollah established a school in Isfahan.  About fifty children attended, and people came to faith – among them a well respected Rabbi.  The rabbi did all he could to support Mirza, encouraging parents to send their children to the Christian school, and providing him with a house for meetings.  However, at the end of the year Norollah was expelled from Isfahan because of false charges, and the school was closed.  Mirza returned to Teheran and spent the next several years traveling around Persia.  In 1897 the school was reopened, with an attendance of 120.

In Teheran schools were opened for boys and girls together with regular Sunday services that included prayer meetings and Bible Study for new believers and enquirers.

In 1919 Mirza Norollah handed the work over to his nephew, Jollynoos.  He died in 1925 after thirty-five years of service.  The ministry continued until the Islamic Revolution.

Prayer: Thank you Lord for this inspiring Iranian Jewish believer in Jesus – his industry, his scholarship, his shining faith. Thank you for the legacy he left, and the many Iranian Jewish believers in Yeshua throughout the world. Lord, we pray for the Jewish community and Jewish believers in Yeshua in Iran, and the Iranian diaspora, that they may have freedom to live out their identity and faith in the knowledge of your purposes for Israel, and your love to all humanity through your Son, the Messiah Yeshua. In his name we pray. Amen

works

translation of the Bible into Judeo-Persian at the request of the British and Foreign Bible Society.

sources

Crombie, Kelvin. Restoring Israel 200 Years of the CMJ Story, Nicolayson’s Ltd,  Christ Church, Jerusalem, 2008
Stephens, George Henry, Jewish Christian Leaders. London, Oliphants/Lakeland. 1966
Bat Ye’or, Kochan, Littman. Islam and Dhimmittude,  Where Civilizations Collide. Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002 (p. 125-126)
Bible Society Archives, BSAZ/1/N 1804-1897      www.janus.lib.com.ac.uk/db/node
          – editor of Persian in Hebrew Characters;
– 18 letters from Hamadan (Iran) and England 1894-1896

The Jews of Iran in the Nineteenth Century: Aspects of History, Community …

edited by David Yeroushalmi

Screen Shot 2014-12-04 at 08.16.13

Screen Shot 2014-12-04 at 08.16.27

Posted in otdimjh | Leave a comment

3 December 1820 Birth of Moses Margoliouth, Anglo-Jewish Historian and British-Israel theorist #otdimjh

margoliouth

Bernstein has a short note:

Moses Margoliouth (1815–1881) was a scholar and Jewish convert to Christianity. He became a minister in the Church of England. Alongside Elieser Bassin, he was also one of the first proponents of British Israelism to be of Jewish descent. He published History of the Jews in Great Britain (1851) and Vestiges of the Historic Anglo-Hebrews in East Anglia (1870).
His nephew was David Samuel Margoliouth.

moses margoliouth

Moses believed the British had Jewish origins, a heresy called British-Israelism then, and the Ephraimite error /Two House error today. His loft prose expresses this clearly, and bearing in mind the time in which he lived and his desire to see philosemitism increase in the UK, so of it is understandable. According to Margoliouth, both Peter and Paul visited the UK to preach to the Jewish descendants of those who built the Temple for Solomon. He wrote:

“A small remnant of (Solomon’s subjects) remained in Cornwall since that time (the time of the building of the Temple). I have traced that remnant by the paths of philology, and the byways of nomenclature. I might adduce an array of whole sentences, exactly alike in the languages of Hebrew and the ancient Cornish. I might adduce some of the proper names which prevailed among the aboriginal Britons long before they knew anything of Christianity, such as Adam, Abraham, Asaph…Daniel, Solomon…” (The Hebrews in East Anglia (1870), Margoliouth)

For this reason I think Bernstein did not devote much space to discussing this well-known but controversial writer who was his contemporary.

The Dictionary of National Biography article is more expansive and revealing:

Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900Volume 36
Margoliouth, Moses

by Gordon Goodwin
·    MARGOLIOUTH, MOSES (1820–1881), divine, was born of Jewish parents at Suwalki, Poland, on 3 Dec. 1820. He was instructed at Pryerosl, Grodno, and Kalwarya in talmudic and rabbinical learning, and also acquired Russian and German. In August 1837, during a visit to Liverpool, he was induced to carefully study the Hebrew New Testament, with the result that on 13 April 1838 he was baptised a member of the church of England. For a time he obtained a livelihood by giving lessons in Hebrew, but in January 1840 he entered Trinity College, Dublin, to prepare for ordination, and during the vacations studied at the Hebrew College, London. In 1843 he became instructor of Hebrew, German, and English at the Liverpool Institution for inquiring Jews. On 30 June 1844 he was ordained to the curacy of St. Augustine, Liverpool. Three months later the Bishop of Kildare obtained for him the incumbency of Glasnevin, near Dublin, and made him his examining chaplain. The parish being small, Margoliouth had much leisure for literary pursuits. He started a Hebrew Christian monthly magazine, entitled ‘The Star of Jacob,’ which extended to six numbers (January- June 1847), and tried to establish a Philo-Hebraic Society for promoting the study of Hebrew literature, and for reprinting scarce Hebrew works. He subsequently served curacies at Tranmere, Cheshire; St. Bartholomew, Salford; Wybunbury, Cheshire (1853-5); St. Paul, Haggerston, London; Wyton, Huntingdonshire; and St. Paul, Onslow Square, London. Among his own people he was an indefatigable worker. In 1847 he visited the Holy Land, and on his return published an interesting account of his wanderings. During his travels he made the acquaintance of many celebrated men, among whom were Neander, Mendelssohn Bartholdy, and Mezzofanti. In 1877 he was presented to the vicarage of Little Linford, Buckinghamshire. He died in London on 25 Feb. 1881, and was buried in Little Linford churchyard. In 1857 he accepted the Ph.D. degree of Erlangen.

 

Prayer: Thank you Lord for the great gifts of scholarship of the Margoliouths, Moses, Ezekiel, David and George. Thank you for the contribution they made to sharing the faith of Yeshua and helping Christians in the United Kingdom understand more of Jewish people and their history. May the works of their scholarship and the thoughts of all our hearts be acceptable in your sight, O Lord, our rock and our redeemer. Where they were in error, may we have discernment and grace to understand, forgive, and built positively on the work they have done. In Yeshua’s name. Amen,

Margoliouth’s chief works are: 1. ‘The Fundamental Principles of Modern Judaism investigated,’ 8vo, London, 1843. 2. ‘An Exposition of the Fifty-third Chapter of Isaiah,’ 8vo, London, 1846 and 1856. 3. ‘ A Pilgrimage to the Land of my Fathers,’ 2 vols. 8vo, London, 1850. 4. ‘The History of the Jews in Great Britain,’ 3 vols. 12mo, London, 1851. 5. ‘Genuine Repentance and its Effects: an Exposition of the Fourteenth Chapter of Hosea,’ 8vo, London, 1854. 6. ‘The Anglo-Hebrews, their Past Wrongs and Present Grievances,’ 8vo, London, 1856. 7. ‘The Curates of Riversdale: Recollections in the Life of a Clergyman,’ 3 vols. 8vo, London, 1860. 8. ‘The End of the Law, being a preliminary Examination of the “Essays and Reviews,”‘ 8vo, London, 1861. 9. ‘Abyssinia, its Past, Present, and probable Future,’ 8vo, London, 1866. 10. ‘Vestiges of the Historic Anglo-Hebrews in East Anglia,’ 8vo, London, 1870. 11. ‘The Poetry of the Hebrew Pentateuch,’ 8vo, London, 1871. 12. ‘The Lord’s Prayer no adaptation of existing Jewish Petitions, explained by the light of the Day of the Lord,’ 8vo, London, 1876. 13. ‘Some Triumphs and Trophies of the Light of the World,’ 8vo, London, 1882. By 1853 he had completed, but apparently did not publish, a Hebrew translation of the New Testament (Notes and Queries, 1st ser. viii. 196). In 1872 he projected a quarterly periodical called ‘The Hebrew Christian Witness and Prophetic Investigator,’ which he continued (with the exception of one year, when the magazine was in abeyance) until the end of 1877. To the early volumes of ‘Notes and Queries’ he contributed many curious articles on Jewish history and antiquities. A portrait of Margoliouth is prefixed to his ‘Pilgrimage,’ 1850.

[Autobiography before Modern Judaism; Memoir prefixed to Some Triumphs; Guardian, 9 March 1881, p. 348; Crockford’s Clerical Directory for 1880; Jacobs and Wolf’s Bibl. Angl. Jud. p. 138; Jewish World, 4 March 1881.]

There is some confusion about Moses and other Margoliouths in the UK, both in their lives and their theology. Who were they, what did they believe, and how were they related?

Bernstein gives details of three other  Margoliouths, Ezekiel, David and George

Margoliouth, Ezekiel, was a very remarkable man, a typical Jew, and a typical convert to Christianity [SIC!]. As an Hebraist he was equal to any of his day. He had a profound knowledge of the Talmud, rare even[352]amongst Talmudists. It was, however, in the composition of modern Hebrew that his chief talent lay, and competent scholars often spoke enthusiastically of the elegance of his rabbinic writings. Like his namesake, Dr. Moses Margoliouth, he was a native of Suwalki in Poland, where he was born in November 1816. His father, Abraham, had been thirty-three years chief rabbi of the town, and his mother could trace twelve rabbis amongst her ancestors. It was natural that Ezekiel should study the Talmud and practise all the precepts of the rabbis with the utmost vigour. After he had become bar mitzvah, he studied with his father, and later on went to Brody, in order to perfect himself in rabbinic lore. There he met enlightened Jews, and often disputed with R. Solomon Kluger. He began to study the Bible, and philosophical works in Hebrew, like those of Maimonides; his desire for knowledge being fostered under Michael Perl of Tarnopol, the first Jewish reformer in Galicia. Later on he went to the rabbinical seminary at Warsaw, where he first met missionaries of the L.J. Society, through whom he was irresistibly drawn to Christ, His Person, and His teachings. At the age of twenty-seven he confessed faith in Christ as his Saviour, though his wife, whom he had married the previous year, for a long time refused to become a Christian. He then came over to England, where she afterwards joined him, and in 1848, also became a Christian. In the same year he entered the Operative Jewish Converts’ Institution to learn bookbinding. In 1852 he was appointed a missionary of the L.J.S. in[353] London, and worked as such almost to the end of his life. It was not as a popular preacher that he excelled, though his faith in, and knowledge of, the Word of God always profoundly attracted his audiences. His chief labours were literary, and in these he had no rival. His “Derech Emunah” and “Nethivoth Olam,” in Hebrew, are masterpieces. His greatest work was the revision of the New Testament in Hebrew in 1865. On May 2, 1894, he passed away in a gentle and peaceful death, greatly mourned both for himself and for the loss of his learning and piety.His son is the Rev. Professor David S. Margoliouth, D.Lit., Laudian Professor of Arabic at Oxford University, and examining chaplain to the Bishop of Liverpool. (emphasis mine)

Ezekiel’s New Testament with Cantillation marks is available at Vine of David here

Screen Shot 2014-12-03 at 08.06.42

Screen Shot 2014-12-03 at 08.07.00

Margoliouth, Rev. George, a nephew of Dr. Moses Margoliouth, was converted to Christianity at Strassburg. He studied philology at the University of Bonn, and theology at Cuddesdon College, was ordained in 1881-1883, held the curacy of St. Thomas’, Leeds, when he was also missionary of the Parochial Missions to the Jews; then at Carleton, Yorks., 1883-84; then again missionary curate of Holy Trinity, Stepney, 1884-87; then at St. Mary the Less, Cambridge, 1887-89; St. Botolph, Cambridge, 1889-91, when he took his degree in Semitic languages, at Queen’s College. He is the author of “Descriptive List of the Hebrew and Samaritan MSS. in the British Museum,” 1893; “The Superlinear Punctuation,” 1893; “The Liturgy of the Nile, Palestinian, Syriac and English,” 1896; “The Palestinian Syriac Version of Holy Scripture, four recently Discovered Portions,” 1896. He also[354] contributed valuable articles to the “Jewish Quarterly Review.”

david margoliouth

For David Margoliouth, son of Ezekiel and nephew of Moses, we read:

David Samuel Margoliouth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

David Samuel Margoliouth (17 October 1858, London – 23 March 1940, London) was an orientalist. He was briefly active as a priest in the Church of England. He wasLaudian Professor of Arabic at the University of Oxford from 1889 to 1937.[1][2]

His father, Ezekiel, had converted from Judaism to Anglicanism, and thereafter worked in Bethnal Green as a missionary to the Jews; he was also close to his uncle,[3] the Anglican convert Moses Margoliouth.[4] Margoliouth was educated at Winchester, where he was a scholar, and at New College, Oxford where he graduated with a double first in Greats and won an unprecedented number of prizes in Classics and Oriental languages, of which he had mastered Arabic, Persian, Turkish, Armenian and Syriac, in addition to Hebrew. His academic disseration, published in 1888, was entitled Analecta Orientalia ad Poeticam Aristoteleam. In 1889 he succeeded to the Laudian Chair in Arabic, a position he held until he retired, from ill health, in 1937.

Many of his works on the history of Islam became the standard treatises in English, including Mohammed and the Rise of Islam (1905), The Early Development of Mohammedanism (1914), and The Relations Between Arabs and Israelites Prior to the Rise of Islam (1924).[2]

He was described as brilliant editor and translator of Arabic works,[2] as seen in The Letters of Abu’l-‘Ala of Ma’arrat al-Nu’man (1898), Yaqut’s Dictionary of Learned Men, 6 vol. (1907–27), and the chronicle of Miskawayh, prepared in collaboration with H. F. Amedroz under the title The Eclipse of the ‘Abbasid Caliphate, 7 vol. (1920–21). Some of David Samuel Margoliouth’s studies are included in The Origins of The Koran: Classic Essays on Islam’s Holy Book edited by Ibn Warraq.

He identified a business letter written in the Judeo-Persian language, found in Danfan Uiliq, northwest China, in 1901, as dating from 718 C.E. (the earliest evidence showing the presence of Jews in China).[5]

He was a member of the council of the Royal Asiatic Society from 1905 onwards, its director in 1927, was awarded its triennial gold medal in 1928, and was its president 1934-37.[1]

Egyptian Poet Laureate Ahmed Shawqi dedicated his famous poem, The Nile, to Margoliouth.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

2 December 1860 Death of Ferdinand Christian Baur, father of studies of “Jewish Christianity” #otdimjh

ChristFDoerr-Dr_von_Baur-Stahlstich

December 2 Death of Ferdinand Christian Baur, pioneering student of “Jewish Christianity”

“It was Baur who gave lucid expression to the central questions in the study of Jewish Christianity” (Oscar Skarsaune)

Ferdinand Christian Baur laid the foundations, and much of the structure, of modern historical-critical study of the New Testament. His provocative thesis that the original believers in Jesus were in fact what later generations of the institutional church considered heretical, continues to challenge and dismay both scholars and regular church-goers alike.

Ferdinand Christian Baur (21 June 1792 – 2 December 1860) was a German Protestant theologian and founder and leader of the (new) Tübingen School of theology (named for the University of Tübingen where Baur studied and taught). Following Hegel’s theory of dialectic, Baur argued that second century Christianity represented the synthesis of two opposing theses: Jewish Christianity (Petrine Christianity) and Gentile Christianity (Pauline Christianity). This and the rest of Baur’s work had a profound impact upon higher criticism of biblical and related texts.

Baur was prepared to apply his theory to the whole of the New Testament; in the words of H. S. Nash, “he carried a sweeping hypothesis into the examination of the New Testament.” He considers those writings alone genuine in which the conflict between Jewish-Christians and Gentile-Christians is clearly marked. In his Kritische Untersuchungen über die kanonischen Evangelien, ihr Verhältniss zu einander, ihren Charakter und Ursprung (1847) he turns his attention to the Gospels, and here again finds that the authors were conscious of the conflict of parties; the Gospels reveal a mediating or conciliatory tendency (Tendenz) on the part of the writers or redactors. The Gospels, in fact, are adaptations or redactions of an older Gospel, such as the Gospel of the Hebrews, of Peter, of the Egyptians, or of the Ebionites. The Petrine Matthew bears the closest relationship to this original Gospel (Urevangelium); the Pauline Luke is later and arose independently; Mark represents a still later development according to Baur; the account in John is idealistic: it “does not possess historical truth, and cannot and does not really lay claim to it.”

FerdinandChristianBaur

Baur’s theory starts with the supposition that Christianity was gradually developed out of Judaism. Before it could become a universal religion, it had to struggle with Jewish limitations and to overcome them. The early Christians were Petrine-Jewish-Christians, to whom Jesus was the Messiah. Paul, on the other hand, represented a breach with Judaism, the Temple, and the Law. Thus there was some antagonism between the Jewish apostles Peter, James and John, and Paul the “Apostle to the Gentiles”, and this struggle continued down to the middle of the 2nd century. In short, the conflict between Petrinism and Paulinism is, as Karl Schwarz puts it, the key to the literature of the 1st and 2nd century.

Baur’s views were revolutionary, but “one thing is certain: New Testament study, since his time, has had a different colour” (H.S. Nash).

Some quotes from Baur

“The greater the conceptual significance of a literary product, the more it should be assumed that it is based on an idea that determines the whole, and that the deeper consciousness of the time to which it belongs is reflected in it.”

“Without philosophy, history is always for me dead and dumb.”

“If historical-criticism has at all the task to search out everything as precisely as possible with regard to writings whose origin and character it investigates, it cannot be satisfied with merely their outward appearance, but must attempt also to penetrate their inner nature. It must inquire not merely about the circumstances of the time in general, but in particular about the writer’s position with regard to these things, the interests and motives, the leading ideas of his literary activity. The greater the conceptual significance of a literary product, the more it should be assumed that it is based on an idea that determines the whole, and that the deeper consciousness of the time to which it belongs is reflected in it. Even with regard to the New Testament writings, therefore, historical criticism would not completely fulfill its task if it did not endeavor to investigate more precisely the conceptual character which they themselves bear, the concerns of the time under whose influence they originated, the direction they pursue, the basic perspective to which the particular subordinates itself — if it did not make any attempt at all to penetrate as far as possible their inner nature, and likewise to peer into the creative conception of the thoughts in the mind of the writer from which these writings went forth.”

Screen Shot 2014-12-01 at 19.49.03

Baur expounds a theory of the origins of Christianity in which Jewish Christianity is primary, prior and heterodox. Using the Hegelian method of thesis, antithesis and synthesis (but not wholly dependent on it), Baur proposed a construal of the development of early Christianity summarized here by Karl Barth – an admirer and critic of this founding father of modern historical-critical method:

barth

In applying this method Baur, to mention some of his most important historical results, saw in Christianity the higher union of paganism and Judaism; he regarded primitive Christianity from the perspective of an opposition between a Jewish-Christian-Petrine Christianity and a Gentile-Christian-Pauline Christianity, both of which are transcended in a Johannine Christianity; he understood Galatians as the thesis, Corinthians as the antithesis and Romans as the synthesis; starting from the gospel of John as synthesis, among the gospels he saw the Jewish-Christian-Matthew (as the earliest gospel) and the Gentile-Christian Luke as the oppositions that were overcome in this synthesis, while Mark was an earlier form of the Johannine unity; church history he divided into the period before the Reformation as the time of affirmation and the period after the Reformation as the negative time of the Church losing itself in the world – the third, higher time of the Church he evidently believed to have dawned in the present. (Karl Barth. Protestant Theology in the 19th Century. Eerdmans, 2002 new ed., 490-1. )

Baur’s legacy continues today, and deeply influences the self-perception of Messianic Judaism, and of the approaches to them adopted by Jewish and Christian scholars, and the communities they represent.

Prayer: Thank you Lord, for the scholarship and wisdom of Ferdinand Christian Baur, his pioneering research, his critical rigour, and his philosophical approach to the nature of Christianity and its Jewish origins. Thank you for the challenges he posed, and the way his work has been further discussed and developed. Now at the beginning of the 21st century we can see the need for even greater understanding of what it meant then, and means today, to be Jewish and believe in Yeshua as Messiah, Saviour and Lord. Please help us tread the path of humility in our scholarship, seeing this also as an act of true discipleship and spiritual worship. In our Messiah’s name, Amen.

skarsaune

Skarsaune’s discussion of the origin of the term “Jewish Christianity”

The contention of this section of the paper must remain skeletal, but in briefit is this: that the origins of the serious study of Jewish Christianity, and in particular its role in the history of earliest Christianity, are to be located in Britain; that many of the neuralgic points of study were aired either in the works of Toland and Morgan, or in the debate that followed the publication of their books, in particular Nazarenus; and that perhaps through Semler, these ideas found their way into the writings of Baur.

To posit the influence of English deists upon German theologians is not to do something eccentric. Such influence is widely accepted and well documented. Such a thesis may in turn explain the origins of the German term “Judenchrist”—it constituted a translation either of the term “Christian Jew” or “Jewish Christian,” understood in terms of Jewish converts to Christianity who continued to observe certain Jewish laws (and in the case of Morgan, understood to have an anti-Pauline aspect), both of which appeared in Toland’s and Morgans respective works, and had already appeared in English long before these works.

  1. Various Definitions since Baur

It is not my intention to give an account of Baur’s work on Jewish Christianity. (3 3) What is clear is that in pungent and detailed form he attributed to JewishChristianity a vital place in what was a “total” account of Christian origins, and that it was precisely the comprehensiveness and the detail of his account that rendered his work so significant. It was Baur who gave lucid expression to the central questions in the study of Jewish Christianity. In this context one recalls in particular his discussion of evidence for the opposition between the Christianity of Paul and that of the apostles, in particular Peter, and especially his use of what he took to be second century literature, in particular the Pseudo-Clementines, in his assessment of this question. One also recalls his attempts to align Ebionite views with those of the earliest Jewish Christians and his attempt to explain the date of individual New Testament writings in relation to their tendency (Jewish Christian, Pauline, Catholic), and to understand the canon as a kind of diplomatic document evidencing the coming together of Jewish and Gentile Christian in the form of early Catholicism. All of this had been hinted at in previous work, as we have shown, but none of it had been expounded with the same lucidity and as part of a unified narrative of Christian development. 3 4 The principal concern of this essay is to discuss the question of the various definitions scholars have adopted in their discussions of Jewish Christianity. Interestingly, Baur, the expositor par excellence, one might think, of the term, does not in any of his works dedicate a detailed discussion to defining it. The term simply appears as a given, assuming, as was implied above, an agreed definition. Implicitly, of course, Baur does define the term, and that definition is in some sense determined by what it opposes, namely Pauline Christianity. Where Pauline Christianity was universal and spiritual (here picking up on a significant aspect of Jesus’ own ministry3 5 ), Jewish Christianity was particular/national and legalistic. In essence, Jewish Christianity was Judaism plus the belief that Jesus was the messiah (a belief that in its conception was Jewish). As he wrote in his Paulus:

“The only thing that divided them (Jewish Christians) from the rest of the Jews was the conviction at which they had arrived, that the promised messiah had appearedto Jesus of Nazareth.” 3 6

A strong commitment to the Jewish law, in particular circumcision, and the Jewish nation over against the Gentiles, with a concomitant anti-Paulinism, are the central aspects of Jewish Christianity. At times in his narrative, Baur hints at divisions within the body he calls “Jewish Christian,” implying the existence of a more liberal wing who did not oppose Paul, 3 7 but this is never fully developed in his later writings where he becomes bolder in his assertion of Paul’s opposition to the views of the apostles. Of course,for Baur’s view of Christian origins to be convincing, he had often to indulge in arguments from silence in order to prove the anti-Paulinism of a particular document (see especially in this regard his discussion of Revelation), and to demonstrate that Jewish Christians changed their opinions, and it is in his discussion of this transformation that he hints at an understanding of Jewish Christianity as in some senses a mentality that went beyond simple legalism and nationalism and bound itself up with a type of moralism, with apocalypticism, a hierarchical view of religion, and an over-reliance on Old Testament categories, 3 8 element s of which were to find their new expression  in the Catholicism of the second century. 3 9

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

1st December 1883 Jacob Lotka reaches Bushire in Persia #otdimjh

Persian feast, Bushire, Persia

Gidney records:

Passing through several towns and villages, Lotka reached Shiraz, the capital of Fars, after eighteen days’ travelling. There the chief rabbi actually helped him to distribute his New Testaments and tracts. Bushire was reached on December 1st, and Lotka preached in the synagogue of the Jews. He arrived at Bagdad next, on December 17th, thus completing a journey which had lasted four months, during which he had distributed 500 New Testaments, and 1,500 books and tracts.

Lotka was not only a pioneering missionary with CMJ – he also had a special bond  with Bernstein, as the two were baptised together on the same day

Lotka, Rev. J., a native of Russian Poland, where he was brought up by his parents in strict orthodoxy, but as he arrived at the age of discretion, he somehow managed to study, besides Hebrew and the Talmud, [343] the Polish and the German languages. Becoming acquainted with much Christian literature he had a great desire to read the New Testament, and this led him to give up the position of a Jewish teacher and to come to London for the purpose of receiving further Christian instruction by Dr. Ewald, who baptized him on November 22, 1863. (together with Bernstein) About two years later he went from the Operative Jewish Converts’ Institution to Basel, studied theology, and was sent out to labour as a Pastor among the Germans in Illinois, U.S.A. In 1879 he was appointed Professor of Hebrew in an Episcopal Seminary near Chicago, where he did also missionary work among the Jews. In 1872, he joined the L.J.S. and was sent to Lemberg, where he laboured for ten years, and visited many towns in Galicia. In 1881, after he had been on a tour of enquiry with the Rev. Frederick Smith in the Crimea, he was sent to Persia, where he remained from two to three years, and laid, so to speak, a solid foundation for the revived mission there. He subsequently laboured for a few years at Posen and Bucharest, and much longer in Birmingham, and then succeeded the Rev. J. C. S. Kroenig at Hull. He was the author of several tracts.

I have been unable to find a photo of Lotka or obtain his short volume of memoirs –

Beloved for the Father’s sake : memoir of the Rev. Jacob Lotka.

Winfarthing, Norfolk : Farthing Press, 1983. 18 pages 175 copies

Winfarthing, Norfolk : Farthing Press, 1983. 18 pages 175 copies

Lotka’s time in the USA is recorded in the

MINUTES OF THE FIRST Hebrew-Christian Conference

OF THE United States.

HELD AT, Mountain Lake Park, Md.,JULY 28-30, 1903.

We read:

The Hebrew-Christians in that city [Chicago] requested the New York brethren to help them in their effort, and G. R. Lederer and Rev. S. Kristeller went to Chicago to be present at the organization the second Monday of May, 1867. Some unexpected difficulties arose after their arrival, but finally a meeting of about forty or fifty persons was held in the lecture room of the Second Presbyterian Church. Rev. Mr. Marquis, afterwards the well-known professor of McCormick Theological Seminary, was chairman, and Rev. Mr. Ryder, of Woodstock, Ill., a Hebrew-Christian, acted as secretary. Some Jews, who were present in the audience, made difficulties, but, after some discussion, the Western Hebrew-Christian Brotherhood was organized. Rev. Dr. Harshaw, a Gentile Christian pastor of Chicago, was elected president; Rev. Jacob Lotka, now the London Jews’ Society Missionary in Hull, England, was appointed missionary, with Rev. F. C. Schwartz, a Presbyterian minister of Woodstock, Ill., another Hebrew-Christian, as his assistant. The corresponding secretary was Emanuel Van Noorden, who, having been a Presbyterian missionary in Brazil, now lives in Sao Paulo, Brazil, a printer of religious literature.

alfred lotka

Lotka’s son Alfred Jams Lotka was a distinguished mathematician. He was born in 1880 in Lemberg, located at that time in Austria, and now in Ukraine (Lviv or Lvov). He studied physics and chemistry at the University of Birmingham and then in Leipzig, where a “center of the new field of physical chemistry, a union of physics and chemistry emphasizing the use of thermodynamic principles in chemical systems” [Kingsland, 1995] had recently been created. He studied physics at Cornell University and became assistant in that field. In 1912, he obtained a D. Sc. in science from the University of Birmingham. Thanks to Raymond Pearl, who was interested by “his mathematical and demographic approach to biological systems”, he was linked with the Department of Biometry and Vital Statistics at Johns Hopkins University, but without any salary. In 1924 he was appointed as supervisor of Mathematical Research and as General Supervisor of the Statistical Bureau at the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in New York. From 1934 to his retirement in 1947 he served in the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company as assistant statistician. He died very soon after his retirement, in December 1949.

lotka theory

Lotka published almost a hundred articles on very various themes, chemistry, physics,
epidemiology, biology, etc. About half of the articles were devoted to population issues. He
also wrote six books. The first, Elements of Physical Biology, was published in 1925. It
became then Elements of Mathematical Biology. In 1930, as joint author with Louis I. Dublin, who was also a statistician at the Metropolitan Insurance Company, he published The money value of a man. In 1934 he published in French the first part of his Théorie analytique des associations biologiques, the part named “Principles”. The second part, “Analyse démographique avec application particulière à l’espèce humaine” was published five years later, in 1939. In this publication, Alfred J. Lotka presented a synthesis of his contribution to the mathematics of population. It is interesting to note that this fundamental book was translated into Spanish and published in 1969 by the Latin American Center of Demography (Celade), a center operating under the auspices of the United Nations based in Santiago, Chile. An English version of this text has been available only since the year 1998, when the book was translated under the title Analytical Theory of Biological Populations.

Prayer: Thank you Lord for the life and work or Jacob Lotka, traveller, minister and encourager of Jewish believers in Yeshua around the world. Thank you for his life of service to you and your people. Thank you also for the great gifts in mathematics of his son Alfred. May all creation praise your name, O Lord, and may the gifts of wisdom and understanding that you have given in science and the arts add to your praise. In Yeshua’s name. Amen.

Sources: http://www.jehps.net/juin2008/Veron.pdf

http://www.jinfo.org/Mathematics_Comp.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_J._Lotka

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-0-85729-115-8_10#page-1 stable population theory

http://www.lcje.net/gsdl/collect/jewishmi/index/assoc/HASH6e9e.dir/doc.doc

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

30 November Patron Saint of Scotland Andrew, brother of Peter, first Hellenistic Jewish believer in Yeshua? #otdimjh

440px-Flag_of_Scotland.svg

As we still live in a United Kingdom that includes Scotland, it is fitting to remember St Andrew, patron saint of Scotland and a nice Gallilean Jewish disciple of Yeshua whose name speaks of his ability to cross cultures, languages and people groups.

Artus_Wolffort_-_St_Andrew_-_WGA25857

Saint Andrew was first made the official patron saint of Scotland at the Declaration of Arbroath in 1320. By 1390 Saint Andrew appeared on coinage for the first time, although the relics which initially led to his saintly status were destroyed during the Scottish Reformation in the 1500s.

St Andrew was crucified by the Romans on a diagonal cross, with the event apparently taking place on 30 November, hence the choice of day to mark his life.

The_Calling_of_Saints_Peter_and_Andrew_-_Caravaggio_(1571-1610)

Collect and Prayers for St Andrew’s day

THE COLLECT

ALMIGHTY God, who didst give such grace unto thy holy Apostle Saint Andrew, that he readily obeyed the calling of thy Son Jesus Christ, and followed him without delay: Grant unto us all, that we, being called by thy holy word, may forthwith give up ourselves obediently to fulfil the holy commandments; through the same Jesus Christ our Lord.Amen.

THE EPISTLE

Romans 10.9-end

IF thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him, in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in him, of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach, except they be sent? As it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the Gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things! But they have not all obeyed the Gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world. But I say, Did not Israel know? First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you. But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me. But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

THE GOSPEL

St. Matthew 4.18-20

JESUS, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea, (for they were fishers;) and he saith unto them, Follow me; and I will make you fishers of men. And they straightway left their nets, and followed him. And going on from thence he saw other two brethren, James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, in a ship with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and he called them. And they immediately left the ship and their father, and followed him.

 340px-Martyrdom_of_andrew

From Wikipedia

Andrew the Apostle (Greek: Ἀνδρέας,Andreas; from the early 1st century – mid to late 1st century AD), also known as Saint Andrew and called in theOrthodox tradition Prōtoklētos(Πρωτόκλητος) or the First-called, was a Christian Apostle and the brother ofSaint Peter.[2]

The name “Andrew” (Greek: manly, brave, from ἀνδρεία, Andreia, “manhood, valour”), like other Greek names, appears to have been common among the JewsChristians, and other Hellenized people of the region. NoHebrew or Aramaic name is recorded for him. According to Orthodox tradition, the apostolic successor to Saint Andrew isPatriarch Bartholomew I.[3]

440px-St_Andrew_the_Apostle_-_Bulgarian_icon

Who was Andrew?

He was the brother of Peter, who was also known as Simon bar-Jonah. He and Andrew shared the same father, so the latter would have been known as Andrew bar-Jonah. Andrew is regularly mentioned after Simon Peter, which suggests that he was Peter’s younger brother.Like his brother Peter, and their partners James and John, Andrew was initially a fisherman on the Sea of Galilee.

What is significant about his name?

The name Andrew (Greek, Andreas) is related to the Greek word for “man” (Aner, or, in the genitive, Andros). It originally meant something like “Manly,” expressing the parents’ hopes for their baby boy.

It is interesting that Andrew’s name is not Aramaic or Hebrew, as might have been expected, but Greek, indicative of a certain cultural openness in his family that cannot be ignored. We are in Galilee, where the Greek language and culture are quite present

The fact that their father—Jonah (or Jonas)—gave his elder son (Simon) an Aramaic name and his younger son (Andrew) a Greek name reflects the mixed Jewish-Gentile environment of Galilee.

How close was Andrew to Yeshua?

In the synoptic Gospels and Acts, the twelve apostles are always listed in three group of four individuals. The first of these groups indicates those who were the closest to Jesus. It includes the two pairs of brothers: (1) Peter and Andrew, the sons of Jonah, and (2) James and John, the sons of Zebedee.

Andrew was thus one of the four disciples closest to Yeshua, but he seems to have been the least close of the four.

This is reflected in the fact that, several times, Peter, James, and John seem to have privileged access to Jesus, while Andrew is not present.

For example, Peter, James, and John were those present for the Transfiguration, but Andrew was not present. They were the closest three, while Andrew was a distant fourth.

This is ironic because he was one of the first followers of Jesus. In fact, he discovered Jesus before his brother Peter did. He was one of the two initial disciples of John the Baptist who encountered Jesus at the beginning of John’s Gospel.

Because he followed Jesus before Peter and the others, he is called the Protoklete or “First Called” apostle.

He was truly a man of faith and hope; and one day he heard John the Baptist proclaiming Jesus as: “the Lamb of God” (Jn 1: 36); so he was stirred, and with another unnamed disciple followed Jesus, the one whom John had called “the Lamb of God”. The Evangelist says that “they saw where he was staying; and they stayed with him that day…” (Jn 1: 37-39).

Thus, Andrew enjoyed precious moments of intimacy with Jesus. The account continues with one important annotation: “One of the two who heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. He first found his brother Simon, and said to him, “We have found the Messiah’ (which means Christ). He brought him to Jesus” (Jn 1: 40-43), straightaway showing an unusual apostolic spirit.

Andrew, then, was the first of the Apostles to be called to follow Jesus. Exactly for this reason the liturgy of the Byzantine Church honours him with the nickname: “Protokletos” [protoclete], which means, precisely, “the first called”.

What do the Gospels tell to us about Andrew?

There are three notable incidents. The first occurs when Yeshua performs the multiplication of loaves.

The Gospel traditions mention Andrew’s name in particular on another three occasions that tell us something more about this man. The first is that of the multiplication of the loaves in Galilee. On that occasion, it was Andrew who pointed out to Jesus the presence of a young boy who had with him five barley loaves and two fish: not much, he remarked, for the multitudes who had gathered in that place (cf. Jn 6: 8-9).

In this case, it is worth highlighting Andrew’s realism. He noticed the boy, that is, he had already asked the question: “but what good is that for so many?” (ibid.), and recognized the insufficiency of his minimal resources. Jesus, however, knew how to make them sufficient for the multitude of people who had come to hear him.

When else does Andrew come to the forefront?

A second instance is when he and the other core disciples question Jesus about his statement that the beautiful stones of the temple will be torn down.

The second occasion was at Jerusalem. As he left the city, a disciple drew Jesus’ attention to the sight of the massive walls that supported the Temple. The Teacher’s response was surprising: he said that of those walls not one stone would be left upon another. Then Andrew, together with Peter, James and John, questioned him: “Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign when these things are all to be accomplished?” (Mk 13: 1-4).

In answer to this question Jesus gave an important discourse on the destruction of Jerusalem and on the end of the world, in which he asked his disciples to be wise in interpreting the signs of the times and to be constantly on their guard.

From this event we can deduce that we should not be afraid to ask Jesus questions but at the same time that we must be ready to accept even the surprising and difficult teachings that he offers us.

Is there a third instance in which the Gospels reveal St. Andrew’s importance?

In a third instance, St. Andrew—with his Greek name—serves as a bridge between Jewish and Gentile followers of Jesus.

Lastly, a third initiative of Andrew is recorded in the Gospels: the scene is still Jerusalem, shortly before the Passion. For the Feast of the Passover, John recounts, some Greeks had come to the city, probably proselytes or God-fearing men who had come up to worship the God of Israel at the Passover Feast. Andrew and Philip, the two Apostles with Greek names, served as interpreters and mediators of this small group of Greeks with Jesus.

The Lord’s answer to their question – as so often in John’s Gospel – appears enigmatic, but precisely in this way proves full of meaning. Jesus said to the two disciples and, through them, to the Greek world: “The hour has come for the Son of man to be glorified. I solemnly assure you, unless a grain of wheat falls to the earth and dies, it remains just a grain of wheat; but if it dies, it produces much fruit” (12: 23-24).

Jesus wants to say: Yes, my meeting with the Greeks will take place, but not as a simple, brief conversation between myself and a few others, motivated above all by curiosity. The hour of my glorification will come with my death, which can be compared with the falling into the earth of a grain of wheat. My death on the Cross will bring forth great fruitfulness: in the Resurrection the “dead grain of wheat” – a symbol of myself crucified – will become the bread of life for the world; it will be a light for the peoples and cultures.

The encounter with the Greek soul, with the Greek world, will be achieved in that profundity to which the grain of wheat refers, which attracts to itself the forces of heaven and earth and becomes bread.

What happened to Andrew in later years?

Some very ancient traditions not only see Andrew, who communicated these words to the Greeks, as the interpreter of some Greeks at the meeting with Jesus recalled here, but consider him the Apostle to the Greeks in the years subsequent to Pentecost. They enable us to know that for the rest of his life he was the preacher and interpreter of Jesus for the Greek world.

Peter, his brother, travelled from Jerusalem through Antioch and reached Rome to exercise his universal mission; Andrew, instead, was the Apostle of the Greek world.

How did Andrew die?

A later tradition, as has been mentioned, tells of Andrew’s death at Patras [in Greece], where he too suffered the torture of crucifixion.

At that supreme moment, however, like his brother Peter, he asked to be nailed to a cross different from the Cross of Jesus.

In his case it was a diagonal or X-shaped cross, which has thus come to be known as “St Andrew’s cross”.

This is what the Apostle is claimed to have said on that occasion, according to an ancient story (which dates back to the beginning of the sixth century), entitled The Passion of Andrew:

“Hail, O Cross, inaugurated by the Body of Christ and adorned with his limbs as though they were precious pearls. Before the Lord mounted you, you inspired an earthly fear. Now, instead, endowed with heavenly love, you are accepted as a gift.

“Believers know of the great joy that you possess, and of the multitude of gifts you have prepared. I come to you, therefore, confident and joyful, so that you too may receive me exultant as a disciple of the One who was hung upon you…. O blessed Cross, clothed in the majesty and beauty of the Lord’s limbs!… Take me, carry me far from men, and restore me to my Teacher, so that, through you, the one who redeemed me by you, may receive me. Hail, O Cross; yes, hail indeed!”.

Here, as can be seen, is a very profound Christian spirituality. It does not view the Cross as an instrument of torture but rather as the incomparable means for perfect configuration to the Redeemer, to the grain of wheat that fell into the earth.

Here we have a very important lesson to learn: Our own crosses acquire value if we consider them and accept them as a part of the Cross of Christ, if a reflection of his light illuminates them.
Sources: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/st.-andrew-the-apostle-11-things-to-know-and-share#ixzz3KUhm1Z8Y

https://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/worship/book-of-common-prayer/collects-epistles-and-gospels/saint-andrew%27s-day.aspx

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

28 November 1830 Grotesque Russification “conversion law” offers financial inducements #otdimjh

1904_Russian_Tsar-Stop_your_cruel_oppression_of_the_Jews-LOC_hh0145s

On November 28, 1830 the law “on the facilities granted to Jews in the region of Bessarabia who accepted Christianity” was passed (Levanda, 1874: 286-287). According to this law, all Christian Jews in Bessarabia received the right not to pay any taxes or benefits throughout life. It seems that the Russian authorities understood that the climate of assimilation, particularly in Bessarabia, was very weak, and decided to give an impetus to improve it. Tihonov A. K. stated that Jews who converted to Christianity received an allowance from 15 to 30 rubles, children got half of that amount (Tihonov, 2007: 190).

Screen Shot 2014-11-28 at 09.29.26

Although slow, the process of converting Jews from one of the many varieties of Christianity started. With the lapse of time, it was noted that this conversion was false. Even being baptized and receiving some concessions that were granted in this case, the Jews remained faithful to their religion. As a result, on October 14, 1830 a Law on the prevention of the Jews to false conversion into Christianity was passed (Levanda, 1874: 282) . According to this law they should not only be issued with a certificate from a priest, confirming that they had been introduced to the dogmas of the Christian religion, but also to have a positive reference from the local priest. It was recommended by the law that the baptism should be made on Sundays in public, all this in order for the impact of their conversion to increase.

Prayer: Father, forgive the insincerity of those who ‘converted’ for financial reasons, and even more those who were forced to this step by the inhospitable conditions and harsh realities of the political pressure, persecution and anti-Jewish legislation they faced. But even more, forgive those who used polemic, propaganda and economic and political pressure to force Jewish people to lose their identity. May we create cultures and societies that only only respect and protect the rights and faiths of minority groups that we may not share or agree with. May we also live our own lives as your disciples in ways that witness to the authenticity of the message of the Messiah through the integrity of our love for you and for others. In Yeshu’s name we pray. Amen.

Sources:

Levanda V. O. (1874), Polnyj Hronologicheskij Sbornik Zakonov i polozhenij kasajuwihsja evreev, ot Ulozhenija Carja Alekseja Mihajlovicha do nastojawego vremeni, ot 1619 do 1873. Izvlechenie iz Polnyh Sobranij Zakonov Rossijskoj Imperii, SPb., 1874, № 84, № 156, № 220, № 224, № 264, p. 88-327.

Tihonov A.K. (2007), Katoliki, musul’mane i iudei Rossijskoj imperii v poslednej chetverti XVIII — nachale XX v.,SPb., Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2007, p. 136-190.

A curious fact is that due to the laws and customs of Moldova, baptized Jews were exempted from payment of all taxes and duties for their lifetime. The law of November 28, 1830 replaced it by a three-year benefit. Russian Jews generally speaking were not forbidden to settle in Bessarabia, while the Jews, subjected by the order of 1829, arriving from Sevastopol & Nikolaev to settle in Bessarabia, already in 1830 were granted, as an exception to the general rule, the ability to use the benefits on duties payment, granted by local cities (1855 preferential: merchants of the Ist grade – 7, IInd – 15, IIIrd grade of – 58).

https://www.academia.edu/1073706/THE_PROCESS_OF_CONVERSION_OF_THE_JEWISH_POPULATION_OF_BESSARABIA_INTO_CHRISTIAN_FROM_MOSAIC_RELIGION_IN_THE_XIXTH_CENTURY

Excerpts from the 1892 Foster Commission Report

http://www.angelfire.com/ms2/belaroots/foster.htm#religion

AN ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF LAWS, SPECIAL AND RESTRICTIVE, RELATING TO THE JEWS IN RUSSIA, BROUGHT DOWN TO THE YEAR 1890

General observation. — It must be remarked that many of the laws here given contradict one another. This fact must not be regarded as involving any innaccuracy in transcription or translation. In Russia, laws are piled on one another without satisfactory consolidation. Hence the contradictions, which as they exist in the original text, exist also in this summary.

ON RELIGION.

  • A married (man or woman) who adopts the orthodox Christian faith must sign a declaration to the effect that (he or she) will endeavor to convert (his wife or her husband) to the same faith. (1887.)
  • Should either a husband or wife (but not both) adopt orthodoxy, both are prohibited residency outside the pale of Jewish settlement. (1857.)
  • If a Jew or Jewess converted to the Christian orthodox religion does not agree to continue his or her life with the spouse remaining in the Jewish religion, the marriage is dissolved, and the convert can marry a person of the orthodox religion. (1887.)
  • Jews on reaching their fourteenth year, may be received in the orthodox church without permission of their parents or guardians. (1876.)
  • The Minister of the Interior may allow Jewish children to be converted to any of the Christian denominations that are tolerated in the Empire, even without the consent of their parents. (1876.)
  • If either husband or wife adopts Christianity, the children under 7 years of age of the same sex as the convert shall also be baptised. (1876.)
  • Every convert to Christianity shall receive a monetary payment of from 15 to 30 rubles, without distinction of sex, and children half that sum. (1876.)
  • Rural communities of Jewish agriculturalists shall keep apart from settlers belonging to another persuasion. (1876.)
  • For the office of rabbi, only such persons are eligible who have passed a course of instruction either in the old Rabbinical schools, or in a training college for teachers, or in one of the public higher or middle class educational establishments. No one, except the rabbis or their assistants, may perform the rites of the Jewish faith. Marriages or divorces not having taken place before the rabbi or his assistant, will be considered illegal. (1886 and 1887.)
    N. B. — Both Rabbinical schools were closed in 1873, i.e. seventeen years ago. Of the two training colleges for teachers, one, namely, that of Zitomir, was closed in 1885. Besides, when these colleges were founded, it was ordained by law, that such pupils as intended to become rabbis should not be received. As to the public educational establishments, it is well known that there neither the Hebrew language, nor the Hebrew religion is taught, but only such branches of knowledge as have nothing in common with Jewish theology. Consequently, such so-called crown rabbis must necessarily be elected who receive their education at the higher and middle class public establishments, but who are absolutely unable to perform religious rites which require theological knowledge. Thus it comes to pass, that the religious requirements of the Jewish communities can not be provided for in a legal manner.
  • Synagogues and houses of prayer in the same streets and squares where orthodox churches exist must be situated at a distance of at least a hundred sazhen(1 s. = 2.13 meters) from the latter.
  • Public prayer and worship may only be held in the synagogues and houses of prayer. Jews holding divine worship in their houses without permission of the authorities will be punished by law. (1876.)
  • The establishment of synagogues is allowed only in places where there are no less than eighty Jewish houses, whereas houses of prayer can be started only in places where there are not less than thirty Jewish houses.
  • Robbery of articles used in public worship, and of effects appertaining to the synagogue, is not considered as sacrilege. (1885.)
  • Background Note

The above information was extracted from a report commissioned by Charles Foster, U.S. Treasury Secretary, in 1891. At the time, U.S. immigration was administered by the Treasury Department. The purpose of the Commission was to determine “the principal causes that incite emigration to the United States”, as well as whether current immigration laws were being followed or abused by the steamship companies and others. The Commission members, separately and together, spent months traveling throughout Europe and Russia, within the Pale of Settlement and outside it. With the assistance of virtually every U.S. Consul in Europe, the commission members had little trouble accumulating the information they wanted and interviewing whomever they wished. To their credit, they not only met with the major players, steamship executives, immigrant aid groups, etc., but also spent considerable time interviewing ordinary Jews. Their (fully indexed) report runs hundreds of pages, containing observations and an eclectic mix of raw research. The report provides insight on the mechanics of Jewish emigration from Russia, as well as laws regarding Jews. Among the material included is:

  • Various transcriptions of passport documents, steamship circulars and regulations, and interview notes
  • laws of various countries, primarily those regarding immigration/emigration and steamship operation

Source: House of Representatives Executive Document No. 235, 52nd Congress, 1st Session, Serial Set 2957

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

29 November 2000 and 1947 Pope John Paul on Anniversary of UN Partition Plan for Palestine #otdimjh

pope

Pope John Paul calls for Peace and Inter-religious dialogue between Jews, Christians and Moslems on Anniversary of UN Partition Plan for Palestine

On a day fraught with significance for the Jewish people and the modern State of Israel, Pope John Paul II gave a fresh call for inter-religious dialogue between Christians, Jews and Moslems in his homily and audience of November 29, 2000:

God the Father offers salvation to all nations

  1. The great fresco just offered to us in the Book of Revelation is filled not only with the people of Israel, symbolically represented by the 12 tribes, but also with that great multitude of nations from every land and culture, all clothed in the white robes of a luminous and blessed eternity. I begin with this evocative image to call attention to interreligious dialogue, a subject that has become very timely in our day.

2. All the just of the earth sing their praise to God, having reached the goal of glory after traveling the steep and tiring road of earthly life. They have passed “through the great tribulation” and have been purified by the blood of the Lamb, “poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Mt 26: 28).

They all share, then, in the same source of salvation which God has poured out upon humanity. For “God sent the Son into the world not to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him” (Jn 3: 17).Salvation is offered to all nations, as was already shown by the covenant with Noah (cf. Gn 9: 8-17), testifying to the universality of God’s manifestation and the human response in faith (cf. CCC, n. 58). In Abraham, then, “all the families of the earth shall bless themselves” (Gn 12: 3). They are on the way to the holy city in order to enjoy that peace which will change the face of the world, when swords are beaten into ploughshares and spears into pruning hooks (cf. Is 2: 2-5).

It is moving to read these words in Isaiah: “The Egyptians will worship [the Lord] with the Assyrians … whom the Lord of hosts has blessed, saying, “Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel my heritage’” (Is 19: 23, 25). “The princes of the peoples”, the Psalmist sings, “are gathered together with the people of the God of Abraham. For God’s are the guardians of the earth; he is supreme” (Ps 47: 10). Indeed, the prophet Malachi hears as it were a sigh of adoration and praise rising to God from the whole breadth of humanity: “From the rising of the sun to its setting my name is great among the nations, says the Lord of hosts” (Mal 1: 11). The same prophet, in fact, wonders: “Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us?” (Mal 2: 10).

  1. A certain form of faith thus begins when God is called upon, even if his face is “unknown” (cf. Acts 17: 23). All humanity seeks authentic adoration of God and the fraternal communion of men and women under the influence of the “Spirit of truth operating outside the visible confines of the Mystical Body” of Christ (Redemptor hominis, n. 6).

In this connection St Irenaeus recalls that God established four covenants with humanity: in Adam, Noah, Moses and Christ (cf. Adversus Haereses, 3, 11, 8). The first three aim in spirit at the fullness of Christ and mark the stages of God’s dialogue with his creatures, an encounter of disclosure and love, of enlightenment and grace, which the Son gathers in unity, seals in truth and brings to perfection.

  1. In this light the faith of all peoples blossoms in hope. It is not yet enlightened by the fullness of revelation, which relates it to the divine promises and makes it a “theological” virtue. The sacred books of other religions, however, are open to hope to the extent that they disclose a horizon of divine communion, point to a goal of purification and salvation for history, encourage the search for truth and defend the values of life, holiness, justice, peace and freedom. With this profound striving, which withstands even human contradictions, religous experience opens people to the divine gift of charity and its demands.

The interreligious dialogue which the Second Vatican Council encouraged should be seen in this perspective (cf. Nostra aetate, n. 2). This dialogue is expressed in the common efforts of all believers for justice, solidarity and peace. It is also expressed in cultural relations, which sow the seed of idealism and transcendence on the often arid ground of politics, the economy and social welfare. It has a significant role in the religious dialogue in which Christians bear complete witness to their faith in Christ, the only Saviour of the world. By this same faith they realize that the way to the fullness of truth (cf. Jn 16: 13) calls for humble listening, in order to discover and appreciate every ray of light, which is always the fruit of Christ’s Spirit, from wherever it comes.

  1. “The Church’s mission is to foster “the kingdom of our Lord and his Christ’ (Rv 11: 15), at whose service she is placed. Part of her role consists in recognizing that the inchoate reality of this kingdom can be found also beyond the confines of the Church, for example, in the hearts of the followers of other religious traditions, insofar as they live evangelical values and are open to the action of the Spirit” (Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue and Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, Dialogue and Proclamation, n. 35). This applies especially – as the Second Vatican Council told us in the Declaration Nostra aetate – to the monotheistic religions of Judaism and Islam. In this spirit I expressed the following wish in the Bull of Indiction of the Jubilee Year: “May the Jubilee serve to advance mutual dialogue until the day when all of us together – Jews, Christians and Moslems – will exchange the greeting of peace in Jerusalem” (Incarnationis mysterium, n. 2). I thank the Lord for having given me, during my recent pilgrimage to the Holy Places, the joy of this greeting, the promise of relations marked by an ever deeper and more universal peace.

* * *

With this homily the Pope called for an increase in dialogue between Jews, Christians and Muslims – was he aware of the historic events that took place in 1947 on that day, launching the modern State of Israel and catapulting it into the War of Independance? Were his theological proposals linked to a political agenda? How did his Jewish visitors feel, and the Hebrew Catholics in the audience?

Prayer: Lord, you alone allot the nations their lands and territories, yet you allow the kingdoms of this world to jostle for place and power whilst we await with longing the coming of your kingdom with justice, righteousness and peace. Then every conflict with be settled, including the long term, violent intractable conflict in Israel/Palestine. We long also for good relationships of tolerance, mutual respect and good listening between all faiths, and pray for the growth of mutual understanding, especially between Christians and their Jewish and Moslem friends. As Messianic Jews, belonging to both Jewish and Christian communities, and with our loyalty to our people in the Land, we carry a sacred and demanding responsibility. Help us live out that calling with the goodness and humility of Yeshua, and be peace-makers following in the footsteps of the Prince of Peace, who gave his own life to reconcile us to God and one another. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen

New Poll
I think this post is worth reading to the endI think this post is too longI enjoyed this postHere are my comments and suggestionsOther:

From Wikipedia

The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal developed by theUnited Nations, which recommended a partition with Economic Union ofMandatory Palestine to follow the termination of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the U.N. General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption and implementation of the Plan as Resolution 181(II).[2]

460px-UN_Palestine_Partition_Versions_1947

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem. The Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution, provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October 1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims of two competing movements: Arab nationalism in Palestine and Jewish nationalism, known as Zionism.[3][4] The Plan also called for Economic Union between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and minority rights.

300px-Palestine_Land_ownership_by_sub-district_(1945)

 

The Plan was accepted by the Jewish public, except for its fringes, and by theJewish Agency despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]

Arab leaders and governments rejected the plan of partition in the resolution[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division.[8] Their reason was that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny.[6][9]

294px-Palestine_Distribution_of_Population_1947_UN_map_no_93(b)

 

Immediately after adoption of the Resolution by the General Assembly, the civil warbroke out.[10] The partition plan was not implemented.[11]

Screen Shot 2014-11-28 at 18.11.47

Screen Shot 2014-11-28 at 18.12.46Screen Shot 2014-11-28 at 18.13.01

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/2000/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_20001129_en.html

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment