3 October 1980 Stanley Hauerwas on Forgiveness after the Shoah in Jewish Journal Sh’ma #otdimjh

downloadshma

This discussion is well worth reading, especially as we have just celebrated the High Holidays. It shows the challenges and differences between Christians and Jews when it comes to discussing forgiveness and reconciliation in the light of the Shoah. Hauerwas and his respondents have much to teach Messianic Jews, and Messianic Jews have much to contribute to the discussion.

51Xk5f7E1oL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

Stanley Hauerwas (born July 24, 1940) is an American theologian, ethicist, and public intellectual. Hauerwas is a longtime professor at Duke University, serving as the Gilbert T. Rowe Professor of Theological Ethics at Duke Divinity School with a joint appointment at the Duke University School of Law in the fall of 2014, he also assumed a part-time position in Theological Ethics at the University of Aberdeen.

imageshau

Before coming to Duke, Hauerwas taught at the University of Notre Dame. Hauerwas is considered by many to be one of the world’s most influential living theologians and was named “America’s Best Theologian” by Time Magazine in 2001. He was also the first American theologian to deliver the prestigious Gifford Lectures at St. Andrew’s in Scotland in over forty years. His work is frequently read and debated by scholars in fields outside of religion, theology, or ethics, such as political philosophy, sociology, history, and literary theory. Hauerwas has achieved notability outside of academia as a public intellectual, even appearing on The Oprah Winfrey Show.

images2com

Though Hauerwas is most well known for his work related to Christian ethics, the relationship between Christianity and politics, and ecclesiology, he has written widely on a diverse range of subjects, such as systematic theology, philosophical theology, political philosophy, the philosophy of social science, law, education, bioethics, and medical ethics. Hauerwas is known for his outspoken advocacy of pacifism, as well of his fierce criticism of liberal democracy, capitalism, and militarism. He is also a critic of both Christian fundamentalism and liberal Christianity and American civil religion. Among his most important contributions to modern theology are his advocacy of and work related to virtue ethics and postliberal theology.

imagesvv

Hauerwas’s work draws from a number of theological perspectives, including Methodism, Anabaptism, Anglicanism, and Catholicism. He is commonly cited as a member of the evangelical left. Hauerwas’s book, A Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Social Ethic, was named as one of the one hundred most important books on religion in the 20th century by Christianity Today.

5144hPPZggL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_[1]

The Holocaust and the Duty to Forgive

Stanley Hauerwas (Sh’ma 10/198, October 3, 1980)

(What follows is a substantially abridged version of a sermon I preached at Rockefeller Chapel at the University of Chicago on Holocaust Sunday which also happens to be the Sunday after Easter. Therefore, I at once had to deal with the resurrection and the Holocaust. I have asked that the sermon be published as a sermon in Sh’ma even though I knew some of the concerns in the sermon might be of little interest to Jewish readers. But the conclusion of the sermon – that Jews must forgive Christians for their complicity in the Holocaust – makes sense only in the light of my attempt to interpret the texts I was obligated to preach on that day. (Job 42:1-6, Acts 5:12a, 17-22, 25-29, John 20: 19-31) For anyone to make such a suggestion may appear nothing short of obscene and therefore I thought it particularly important for me to receive criticism from Jewish readers. I took forward to learning from your response.)

Resurrection, as the felt absence of God, seems particularly powerful when we must face, as we must this Sunday, the Holocaust. All those who used to celebrate the absence of God as providing the space and arena for human freedom have run aground on this reality. We live in a world where six million Jews and other “non-desirables” were put to death by people not too unlike you and me. How are we to explain that one, for like evil itself, every explanation seems to trivialize the reality. Who can blame God for exiting from this kind of world? I do not particularly want to be involved with it either.

51YRb45FjRL._AC_UL320_SR206,320_

But I am involved with it. I am the inheritor of the history and benefits of a civilization that brutally and cold bloodedly put six million people to death for no other reason than that they claimed to be God’s chosen people. And like Job we cry out for an explanation — how and why could this happen to your own and why and how could it be perpetrated in a culture formed by those who claim to worship the same God as the Jews? And like Job all we feel we get back is claimed power and incomprehensibility made all the more unsatisfactory by being packaged in magnificent poetry. Job claims he now despises his doubt because where once he only had heard God now he sees him, but that hardly seems satisfactory. Claims of power hardly seem appropriate for the question raised by the Holocaust.

And that makes us particularly sympathetic with Thomas and his demand to “show me.” Like doubting Thomas (John 21:25), especially after Auschwitz, we want to see some marks that God has not abandoned us in the mess. For Auschwitz seems to be the surest sign we have that is exactly what has happened. Where is God in this — or even more radically if God is in this how can we possibly continue the presumption that he is worthy of worship?

Shma_566_356_c1

Christian faith demands forgiveness.

We think we might be better believers in spite of the commendation for those that believe without having seen, if we could just get some better evidence. We want to know if Jesus really was who he claimed, or if he even claimed to be who we think him to be.

That the issue is not evidence is clear from the incompatibility of the evidence with Thomas’ confession. For after Jesus shows him his hands and side, Thomas exclaims, “My Lord and my God! ” That is an extraordinary deduction from nail marks. But what Thomas saw in those nail marks was not evidence of resurrection, but that the resurrected Lord is not different from the crucified Messiah. The presence of such a Lord is the presence of the Lord whose exaltation is the cross on which comes our forgiveness. For what does it mean to confess Jesus as Lord other than he has the power to forgive sin even to giving us that power.

That Thomas was able to see that the resurrected Lord is not different from the crucified Messiah came from the fact that he had first learned to follow Jesus as his disciple. And like Thomas, if we are to understand the significance of those holes, we must also learn to be trained to be his disciples. But such training entails that we learn to be in the presence of a Lord whose power is that of forgiveness and thus creates a community of forgiveness. For if we have received the Holy Spirit, his continuing presence, he tells us we have the power to forgive sins. And we have such power because through his cross and resurrection we know we have been forgiven. No small matter to be sure, for it is exactly the power of God that allows us to allow ourselves to be forgiven. No smaller matter to be sure, for it is exactly that power of God that allows ourselves to be forgiven — much more than to forgive.

imagesbks

We want a God of power- not forgiveness

Note how different this presence is than that of the incomprehensibility of the God who speaks from the whirlwind — what is incomprehensible not the power, but the power that forgives. So in effect the schooling that Thomas must undergo is not unlike the schooling that we must undergo in the face of Auschwitz. Like Thomas we seek a God of power that will make the horrible reality of the Holocaust come out right, but all we find is a God whose presence and power resides in his steadfast graciousness. Such a presence is easily trivialized but when properly accepted it has a power that scares the wits out of the world. For the world does not seek to be forgiven, but to be in control by pretentiously assuming it has the power to forgive.

For preaching this message of forgiveness we find Peter imprisoned. All that Peter said was “The God of our fathers raised Jesus whom you killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him at his right hand as Leader and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness ofsins. And we are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those that obey him. ” (Acts 5: 29- 32) For that we can end up in prison as we find what we, and the world, want is not a God with a power to forgive, we really want the God of Job — the God of sheer power. We want a God that makes it possible to insure “never again” when faced with Auschwitz and all we get is a God that calls us to be forgiven. For that in short is the heart of the Gospel — namely that we have been forgiven for the Holocaust. Resurrection is not God’s retreat from us, but rather the clear sign that nothing we can do can alienate us from his steadfast will to forgive and love us and thus to make us into a people capable of forgiving and loving.

51Xk5f7E1oL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_

Who is responsible for the Holocaust?

But wait a minute! This is not the message we want when faced with Auschwitz. There are at least two substantive objections to putting the matter this way. First many feel they do not need to be forgiven for the Holocaust. After all, there have been worse genocides in history. All this talk about the uniqueness of the Holocaust is but another way the Jews are reasserting their uniqueness. And of course there is some truth to that, but indeed that is exactly why the Holocaust is so significant — it happened to the Jews in the midst of an ostensibly Christian civilization.

But even that, many feel is not a peculiarly significant fact. After all, we did not do it. We Christians in America did not do it. Indeed we fought to undo it. The attempt of many to claim responsibility for Auschwitz, is but a masochistic attempt to secure moral identity by irrationally claiming guilt in a morally confused civilization. And again there is some truth to such criticism, but not very much. We simply cannot avoid, as Christians, recognizing that we prepared people for the Holocaust for centuries. Who can listen after Auschwitz to the Johannine crucifixion account on Good Friday with its constant referent to “the Jews did this” and “the Jews did that” without feeling uncomfortable. Yet we have to go on reading those passages as they remind us, we are in fact “the Jews” to which the text refers. And thus we are reminded why we need forgiveness for the Holocaust – namely because we have failed to be the church our very scripture has been turned into an ideology for vengeance.

An even more substantive difficulty with talking about being forgiven for the Holocaust comes from the survivors of Auschwitz. For surely from their perspective Christian talk about forgiveness in connection with Auschwitz is nothing less than obscene. What gall and pretention. First the Christians kill and persecute the Jews and then they turn around and claim that God has forgiven them of such heinous crimes — not only forgiven them, but now they can learn to forgive themselves. The Jews should rightly feel that such forgiveness is surely cheap grace, but nonetheless that is what we must say. To say anything less would be to obey men and not God and thus be robbed of the Holy Spirit we have been given through the resurrection.

Christians must ask forgiveness of Jews

Indeed, Christian complicity with the Holocaust was due to our forgetting our task was to obey God and not men, that our task was not to form a civilization where we would be safe from being thrown in jail for preaching God’s forgiveness, but rather our task is to be a community of the forgiven. For such a community knows that God chooses not to rule the world by power divorced from love but rather comes to us as the crucified Lord who remains ever ready to forgive — even the Holocaust.

I do not pretend that this message can be or should be easily accepted by Jew or Christian but it is the message of the Gospel. But I am afraid the claim is finally even more offensive than this. Indeed I hesitate to say it and certainly would try to avoid it if I were not under the discipline of these texts. For the resurrection not only means that we Christians have an obligation to accept forgiveness for the Holocaust, but we must ask the Jews to forgive us. If we do not do so we cannot help but be caught in the eternal game of I am guiltier than you and thus fail to face our common destiny.

Questions of whether the Jew should be converted pale next to this. For our task is not to make Jews Christians, but simply to ask them to forgive us. We must do that because we believe that we worship the God who in Christ has asked nothing new that had not already been asked of the Jew and the non-Jew. Just as the Jew has so often been forced to see God in the face of the stranger so we must ask the Jew to see their God in us, the Christians — a God who asks of them and of us that we be capable of forgiveness. The reality of the Holocaust cannot be made to go away by continuing to weigh up guilt and responsibility. Such exercises, while not completely pointless, often come close to being obscene. Rather what we and the Jew must both do is to remember. But without forgiveness we Christians are tempted simply to forget or deny; and Jews are tempted to lose their humanity in humiliation or vengeance. But if we are forgiven we have the chance to remember and to make this terrible event part of our common history as we each look forward to the day when God’s kingdom will come and we can embrace as brother and sister.

In the meantime, we can celebrate his presence — the presence of his Spirit among us — by learning how to allow ourselves to be forgiven. We cannot very well march up to our Jewish neighbors and ask them to forgive us if we have created no other significant ties with them. With some imagination we can think of ways to let them appreciate how we — as “Easter people” — live by a new life not in triumph but in our openness to the suffering that has been theirs and is part of our history as well. In this way, we can begin a new journey together — with this week as a new beginning.

Prayer: Before reading the responses below, take a moment to ponder Hauerwas’ position. Here is the Jewish prayer of forgiveness from the siddur, prayed each night before going to bed.

 

I hereby forgive anyone who has angered or provoked me or sinned against me, physically or financially or by failing to give me due respect, or in any other matter relating to me, involuntarily or willingly, inadvertently or deliberately, whether in word or deed: let no one incur punishment because of me.

 

http://www.clal.org/e53.html

Stanley Hauerwas, The Holocaust and the Duty to Forgive (Sh’ma 10/198, October 3, 1980)

Marjorie Yudkin, Our Readers Respond to Hauerwas (Sh’ma 11/202, November 28, 1980)

Trude Weiss-Rosmarin, The Duty to Do Justice (Sh’ma 11/202, November 28, 1980)

Stanley Hauerwas, In Response: Forgiveness and Forgetting (Sh’ma 10/198, October 3, 1980)

 

[Last week we reprinted a controversial piece on the Holocaust and forgiveness by Stanley Hauerwas, a Protestant theologian. In the course of the next three weeks we will reprint responses to Hauerwas and the latter’s reply.]

Our Readers Answer Pastor Hauerwas

Marjorie S. Yudkin (Sh’ma 11/202, November 28, 1980)

Sh’ma has received considerable response to the sermon by Stanley Hauerwas published in 10/198. We apologize for not being able to publish the correspondence in its entirety. Here is a summary:

Werner Glass questions Hauerwas ‘ “definition of the. crime that was committed: ‘…a civilization … put six million people to death for no other reason than that they claimed to be God’s chosen people.’ The active fault of the victims is emphasized: ‘…they claimed to be…’ In the ears of his congregation this claim was clearly presumptuous and fraudulent, thus some punishment was deserved, if not the death penalty … Surely the distinguishing characteristic was not any claim, fraudulent or otherwise, made by the victims of genocide.” Glass suggests that Hauerwas “blames the victim ” and transfers the guilt to God, while it was people who committed the deeds.

Dayton Yoder, a Unitarian minister asks of Hauerwas “Why does he expect Jews to be influenced by texts which they do not accept as scripture, or the authority of Jesus whom they do not believe to be God?” Similarly, Erica Gorin questions Hauerwas’ textual interpretation. “I assume that Dr. Hauerwas wants the Jews’ forgiveness because of John 20:22-2 3: ‘And when he said this, he breathed on them, and said to them “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven, if you retain the sins of any, they are retained. ” ‘ However, according to the Gospel, Jews have not accepted the Holy Spirit. Hence they cannot grant forgiveness. ”

Difficulties in Granting Forgiveness

Respondents were also concerned by the image of an all-forgiving Deity. Yale J. Berry writes “Hauerwas states that ‘for God, resurrection is … the clear sign that nothing we can do can alienate us from his steadfast will to forgive us and love us.’ If you know that you are forgiven all deeds and acts, you can then perform all deeds and acts and count on forgiveness. Rather… the emphasis should be that all individuals forgive other individuals, but … we should not accept self-forgiveness easily or perhaps at all, whether individually or collectively…If (people) are not forgiven there is the opportunity that they will remember more intensely. Rabbi Leo Trepp warns against the ominous nature of the ” ‘blank check’ given Hauerwas’ flock for the future. Should Christians stand idly by, while Israel is in mortal danger, or rest at ease while Jews are persecuted, or even participate in such persecution, they need feel no guilt afterwards. They merely have to learn to forgive themselves, as God always forgives everything.”

Many writers felt that they could not grant Christians forgiveness because it must be granted by the victims, by God. Erica Gorin notes “As a Jew, who was fortunate in leaving Germany as a child in 1939 …. I believe with Rabbi Leo Baeck who cited the 94th Psalm as his authority that vengeance belongs to God. Thus forgiveness must come from God also. Men cannot grant it. According to Judaism, good deeds can lead to God’s forgiveness.” Herbert Hubert, who converted to Judaism in 1929 in Germany, was expelled from that country in 1939 and sent to Buchenwald. Discharged under the condition that he leave the country immediately, he lived in Shanghai for 18 months before emigrating to the United States. He questions “if (Hauerwas) feels he must insist on asking to be forgiven whom does he want to ask? My mother-in-law or my wife’s cousins and aunts and uncles, or all those others who went up in smoke? Jewish understanding of atonement and forgiveness demands that in order to be forgiven one must ask the one who was wronged to be forgiven … How can I forgive for what was done to the ones that are no more?”

How to Atone, how to Remember

Among those who could envision granting forgiveness, there were suggestions to concerned Christians. Rabbi William J. Leffler argues that an effort to do teshuvah, , “to change some of the conditions in Christianity which permitted supposed Christians to be among the persecutor,” is necessary. Rabbi Samuel M. Silver responds “Of course Christians can have our forgiveness. But like Jews who seek forgiveness for their faults, Christians should earn it. How? First, admit the errors. Second, do it publicly. Third, atone by acts of Penitence. In our times, the third step would entail mobilizing against those forces which seek once more to gang up on Jews… ” Paul Ostrand focuses on the need to learn from history. “I believe the Christian needs to come honestly to grips with what was done by ‘civilized’ men and try to understand how it could have happened. If this could be done, then I don’t think it would be possible for it to happen again. ” Matthew Garfinkel suggests that “perhaps a prayer for forgiveness as a permanent part of the liturgy would serve” the function of preventing humanity from ever forgetting what happened during that horrible time.

Advice to the Jewish community is included with these words to Christians. Rabbi Leo Trepp believes “that Christians should ask the Jews to forgive them, and Jews should search their hearts in an effort to be forgiving. Hatred of the Jews led to Christian loss of humanity, resulting in the Holocaust. Jews may not lose their humanity by holding the children guilty for the sins of their fathers, for the Torah forbids it.”

Much of the debate revolves around the contrasting Jewish and Christian understanding of messianism. This is summarized by the conclusion of Dr. Stephen I. Rosenthal’s letter to Hauerwas. “May the day soon come, when mankind truly follows your teachings, and our teachings, then it will be time to talk of forgiveness.”

About richardsh

Messianic Jewish teacher in UK
This entry was posted in otdimjh and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to 3 October 1980 Stanley Hauerwas on Forgiveness after the Shoah in Jewish Journal Sh’ma #otdimjh

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.