27 December 1814 Charles Simeon attends his first London Society (CMJ) Board Meeting #otdimjh

simeon

Charles Simeon (24 September 1759 – 13 November 1836) was a leading clergyman within the Evangelical party of the Church of England. When he began his ministry at Holy Trinity, Cambridge, he was so unpopular that the Churchwardens barred his entry, services were frequently interrupted, and he was often insulted in the streets. Overcoming public prejudice, he subsequently gained a remarkable and lasting influence among the undergraduates of the university. His exposition of Scripture according to a responsible hermeneutic, Reformed theological base and Pietist application, gave Evangelicalism in the United Kingdom a strong base on which to develop.

CharlesSimeon2

According to the historian Thomas Macaulay, Simeon’s “authority and influence… extended from Cambridge to the most remote corners of England, …his real sway in the Church was far greater than that of any primate.”

horae

Not only was Simeon a passionate and systematic expositor of the Scriptures. He was also passionate about world mission, and Jewish evangelism in particular. As Simeon was a founding member of the Church Missionary Society (CMS) in 1799, and of the London Society for the Promoting Christianity Amongst the Jews (CMJ) in 1809.

horae2

Gidney records:

A story is told of him [Edward Bickersteth] and Charles Simeon to this effect: They were once present at a meeting held in support of the Society [CMJ]. Simeon was the speaker, and, in closing his speech, he said that they had met together that day for the furtherance of the most important object in the world, viz., the conversion of the Jews. When Simeon sat down, Bickersteth wrote on a slip of paper — eight million Jews, eight hundred million heathens, which of these is the most important? This paper he handed to Simeon, who at once turned it over and wrote on the other side: Yes, but if the eight million Jews are to be as “life from the dead*” to the eight hundred million heathens, what then? This done, he returned the slip of paper to Bickersteth.

memoir-rev-edward-bickersteth-volume-1-hardcover-cover-art

Gidney, who gives Simeon 83 mentions, observes: It is interesting to note that the honoured name of Charles Simeon appears for the first time in the list of officials as a Country Director. He had been both a contributor to, and advocate for, the Society from the first, but he now “came on board.”  He had been very active in recent events, for, on reference to the Minutes of Committee of those days, we find that he was present on December 27th 1814, and in 1815 on January 31st, February 17th, 21st, 24th, 28th, March ist, and again on the 14th at a General Meeting when the minutes of the General Meeting of February 28th were confirmed, and the great question of the withdrawal of the Nonconformists from participation in the Society was finally settled.  Simeon helped steer CMJ through the choppy waters of denominational division. When the Society formed in 1809 the aim was for it to be inter-denominational, with Anglicans and Non-Conformists participating together. But differences arose over baptism and other questions, and in 1814, the Society became strictly Anglican, with the others forming the British Society. Simeon was one of those who saw through this process, and Gidney reports:

To use the forcible language of Charles Simeon, “The dissenting part of the managers then took to the long boat, and the Churchmen set to work at the pumps.”Thus Churchmen became the sole managers of the Society.

Two of Simeon’s letters, December 29th, 1814, and January 10th, 1815, within this period, are dated from Stanstead Park, Emsworth, the residence of Lewis Way. We can imagine that the tangled affairs of the Society at this juncture gave the two friends much to talk about.  In the first of these letters Simeon says: “The whole Society is placed on a firmer basis than ever. I expect now that some of our higher Churchmen will come in, and all serious clergy through the land.” The word “serious” was in general use to denote the Evangelical clergy.  

Through Simeon’s involvement the Society stay within the bounds of Anglican Evangelicalism. Simeon’s sermons on the Jews were distinctly premillennial in their eschatology, longing for a return of the Jews to the land of Israel in combination with an enthusiasm for evangelism amongst them.

Prayer: Thank you for the influence and inspiration of Charles Simeon in his preaching of the Good News of the Messiah, his call to share the Good News with the Jewish people, and his strong expectation of the Restoration of Israel, physically and spiritually. Help us to build responsibly, sensitively and respectfully on his life and legacy, and as Messianic Jews let us truly and humbly find ourselves part of the answer to his question “What then?”. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen. 

Sources:

T. Gidney, The History of The London Society For Promoting Christianity Among The Jews (London: CMJ, 1908), 273. For other versions see Eugene Stock, History of the Church Missionary Society (London: CMS, 1899), 154; Thomas Rawson Birks, Memoir of the Rev. Edward Bickersteth (New York: Harper, 1851, vol. 2), 53.

http://www.cwi.org.uk/downloads/ONE16_Edition2.pdf – page 25

http://www.charlessimeon.com/home/bibliography.shtml

http://archive.churchsociety.org/churchman/documents/Cman_102_2_Bennett.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Simeon

Discourses in Behalf of the Jews. London: Samuel Holdsworth, 1839.

From THE TESTIMONY OF THE REV. CHARLES SIMEONON THE DUTY OF CHRISTIANS TO THE JEWS(FROM REV. W. CARUS’S MEMOIR) ‘Take care of these texts, they are gold every one ofthem’ He then dictated the following:-‘I wish to show you what grounds wehave for humiliation, in that we havebeen so unlike to God in our regardstowards his fallen people; see Jer. xii. 7,“I have given the dearly beloved of mysoul into the hands of her enemies;”and again, (Rom. xi. 28,) “As touchingthe election, they are beloved for thefathers’ sake.” And to bring you into aconformity to God in relation towardsthem, so far as it respects your effortsfor their welfare and your joy intheir prosperity, see Ezek. xxxvi.22-24. “Therefore say unto the houseof Israel, Thus saith the Lord God; Ido not this for your sakes, O house ofIsrael, but for mine holy name’s sake,which ye have profaned among theheathen, whither ye went. And I willsanctify my great name, which wasprofaned among the heathen, whichye have profaned in the midst of them;and the heathen shall know that I amthe Lord, saith the Lord God, when Ishall be sanctified in you before theireyes. For I will take you from amongthe heathen, and gather you out ofall countries, and will bring you intoyour own land.” And again, (Jer. xxxii.41,) “Yea, I will rejoice over them todo them good, and I will plant themin this land assuredly with my wholeheart and with my whole soul.” Andlastly, (see Zeph. iii. 17,) “The Lord thyGod in the midst of thee is mighty ;he will save, he will rejoice over theewith joy; he will rest in his love ; hewill joy over thee with singing. I willgather them that are sorrowful for thesolemn assembly, who are of them, towhom the reproach of it was a burden.Behold, at that time I will undo allthat afflict thee; and I will save herthat halteth, and gather her that wasdriven out; and I will get them praiseand fame in every land where theyhave been put to shame. At that timewill I bring you again, even in thetime that I gather you; for I will makeyou a name and a praise among allpeople of the earth when I turn backyour captivity before your eyes, saiththe Lord.”“On Sunday morning, October 30th,when I came to him, after hearingthe sermons on behalf of the Jews,and began to speak to him of theforcible manner in which the matterhad been treated by Mr. Noel, heimmediately rejoined, by a commenton our ignorance, as well as want offeeling on the whole subject; andthen, alluding to the texts beforeselected, he begged me to observe thestrong expressions which God hadbeen pleased to use, when describingHis intense and unalterable regardfor his ancient people. ‘See,’ said he,‘how wonderfully be speaks; he callsthem, 1. “The dearly beloved of mysoul;” and then he says, 2, “I will plantthem in this land assuredly, with mywhole heart, and with my whole soul;’and then again, 3. “He will rejoiceover them with joy; he will rest inhis love; he will joy over them withsinging;” nay more, 4. “They shall bea name and a praise among all peopleof the earth.” ’ His thoughts on this,and the following days, as might beanticipated, were chiefly given to thesubject of the Jews.”

Prayer and Reflection – based on Simeon’s life of prayer – from Prince of Evangelicals  Simeon at Prayer Simeon’s spiritual life was fed by personal prayer for which he often arose at 4 a.m. When he changed his rooms he engaged in it on their eves. Prayer undergirded his utterances, friendships and ministry. His custom was to meet with his curate and a few others on Sunday evening in his rooms for supper and spiritual devotion, a church dignity once present being deeply moved by his closing prayers of humiliation and confession that, ‘our tears may bewashed in the atoning blood of Christ’. He challenged others to pray, as in the second sermon preached to the infant Church Missionary Society in which he countered objections to overseas missions by pleading: ‘Let all excuses be put away, and let all exert themselves at least in prayer to the great “Lord of the Harvest”, and entreat Him day and night “to send forth labourers into His harvest”’. He believed that church committees needed special prayer, because, as Cabinets their members are human and mistakes and errors will be made, but if there was more prayer God would better direct them. His prayer intensity focussed itself on those who opposed him, asked for his intercessions, or were unconverted. When slandered by a newspaper editor he answered, ‘I will pray for him’. For his uncivil churchwardens who locked his church door against him he prayed: ‘May God bless them with enlightening grace’. To an unknown correspondent he wrote that it was enough for him to hear from ‘a fellow sinner in distress,’ for he could then pray for him. Hesometimes spent nights in prayer, and once interceded throughout a week for a friend in need.  To John Venn he wrote: ‘To my thanksgivings I added my poor prayers for still more rich and more abundant blessings that all which God has already done for you may be only the drops before the shower’. Believing in the power of prayer to soften the heart and open it to Christ, he told his brother John to pray to become a Christian. Often in company he would silently intercede for others, as once, when horse-riding, a young German agnostic came to him and asked why his lips were moving, and was met with the reply, ‘I am praying for you my friend’. Subsequent conversation with Simeon led to his conversion. He delighted in social prayer, and boldly introduced others to it, and wherever possible, as at Stapleford and on his Scottish tours, he created prayer circles, some continuing for many years. When Miles Atkinson, Vicar of St. Edward’s church, Cambridge, proposed a universal prayer session at 9 p.m. on Friday evenings for the nation then at war with France, Simeon gave it full support, and persuaded his friends likewise. In 1807 at a time of malevolent slander he wrote to Edward Edwards: ‘Amidst all that I feel to mourn over, my soul rejoicesexceedingly in God my Saviour. I trust that this joy will be made to abound more and more when you put your live coal to mine, and blow it with the breath of prayer’. Often knowing that he did not love an opposer as he should, he tried, he said, to put the dearest object of his affections in his place and pray for him. Simeon grounded his prayer life on the majesty and sovereignty of God, for; ‘With Him there is no weariness, nor any defect either of inclination or of power’. But he must be sought not only for help but, ‘much more for the communications of His grace, and manifestations of His glory’. It was his abiding conviction that: ‘A close walk with God is necessary for maintaining of fervour in intercession . . . It is scarcely ever that we can intercede with fervour, unless we enjoy an habitual nearness to God’. To one who was ill he wrote that her seclusion would give her opportunity for: ‘more intrinsic and abiding communion with yourLord . . . My prayer to God for you is that you may have such abundant discoveries of his incomprehensible love, as may be more effectual to “fill you with all the fulness of God”’. In his view every attribute of God deserved ‘all imaginable praise from his creature’. Above all he must be contemplated in his Son who should be praised for ‘assuming our nature, and expiating our sins by His own blood upon the cross, and as becoming the living head of all His believing people’.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

26 December Feast of Stephen, first Messianic Jewish martyr #otdimjh

96ff7c0caab404cfba2cf8e3de8f5d9dfb50f45b

Stephen was a Hellenist, a Greek-speaking Jew influenced by Greco-Roman culture, who was a disciple of Yeshua. “Stephanos” is the Greek for garland, the prize laurel wreath awarded to victors at the games or after a battle. It may well be a pseudonym, but is a typically Hellenistic name.

the-stoning-of-st-stephen-1604

When the number of disciples increased, there was much confusion over the distribution of alms and the serving of the poor. Stephen’s trustworthy character marked him out, and he was chosen as one of the seven deacons who would perform this task.

Stoning_St_Stephen_Saint-Etienne-du-Mont

An excellent orator, his preaching style was so effective that he was accused of blasphemy and put on trial.

StStephenIconForWeb

At the supreme Jewish law court, the Sanhedrin, Stephen recounted the many mercies that God had given the children of Israel, and the ungrateful way in which they had repaid Him. He accused them of murdering Jesus, whose coming, he said, had been foretold by Moses. His sermon (see below)is a rhetorical tour de force, a homilectical midrash on the history of Israel, but it angered the crowd and he was dragged out onto the streets. He was then stoned to death according to the law at that time, an event witnessed by Paul. It is believed he died around the year 34CE.

stephen

He is believed to have been initially buried in a grave to the north of Jerusalem, but this body was exhumed and moved to a new grave outside the Damascus Gate. This is where the stoning is believed to have taken place.

Stephen is the patron saint of deacons, headaches, horses, coffin makers, and masons. He is often represented carrying a pile of rocks or with rocks on his head.

3261-3

St Stephen’s Day is 26th December and his name mentioned in the the Christmas carol “Good King Wenceslas”.

Prayer: People of Israel, and all nations, Give thanks for Stephen, the faithful disciple of Yeshua, whose wisdom, testimony and faith led to his martyrdom. Lord, help us to be willing to pay such a price, and may our lives speak of the surpassing value of knowing you. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Stephen

Acts 7 (ESV)

And the high priest said, “Are these things so?” And Stephen said:

“Brothers and fathers, hear me. The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia, before he lived in Haran, and said to him, ‘Go out from your land and from your kindred and go into the land that I will show you.’ Then he went out from the land of the Chaldeans and lived in Haran. And after his father died, God removed him from there into this land in which you are now living. Yet he gave him no inheritance in it, not even a foot’s length, but promised to give it to him as a possession and to his offspring after him, though he had no child. And God spoke to this effect—that his offspring would be sojourners in a land belonging to others, who would enslave them and afflict them four hundred years. ‘But I will judge the nation that they serve,’ said God, ‘and after that they shall come out and worship me in this place.’ And he gave him the covenant of circumcision. And so Abraham became the father of Isaac, and circumcised him on the eighth day, and Isaac became the father of Jacob, and Jacob of the twelve patriarchs.

“And the patriarchs, jealous of Joseph, sold him into Egypt; but God was with him 10 and rescued him out of all his afflictions and gave him favor and wisdom before Pharaoh, king of Egypt, who made him ruler over Egypt and over all his household. 11 Now there came a famine throughout all Egypt and Canaan, and great affliction, and our fathers could find no food. 12 But when Jacob heard that there was grain in Egypt, he sent out our fathers on their first visit. 13 And on the second visit Joseph made himself known to his brothers, andJoseph’s family became known to Pharaoh. 14 And Joseph sent and summoned Jacob his father and all his kindred, seventy-five persons in all. 15 And Jacob went down into Egypt, and he died, he and our fathers, 16 and they were carried back to Shechem and laid in the tomb that Abraham had bought for a sum of silver from the sons of Hamor in Shechem.

17 “But as the time of the promise drew near, which God had granted to Abraham, the people increased and multiplied in Egypt 18 until there arose over Egypt another king who did not know Joseph. 19 He dealt shrewdly with our race and forced our fathers to expose their infants, so that they would not be kept alive. 20 At this time Moses was born; and he was beautiful in God’s sight. And he was brought up for three months in his father’s house,21 and when he was exposed, Pharaoh’s daughter adopted him and brought him up as her own son. 22 And Moses was instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds.

23 “When he was forty years old, it came into his heart to visit his brothers, the children of Israel. 24 And seeing one of them being wronged, he defended the oppressed man and avenged him by striking down the Egyptian. 25 He supposed that his brothers would understand that God was giving them salvation by his hand, but they did not understand.26 And on the following day he appeared to them as they were quarreling and tried to reconcile them, saying, ‘Men, you are brothers. Why do you wrong each other?’27 But the man who was wronging his neighbor thrust him aside, saying, ‘Who made you a ruler and a judge over us? 28 Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian yesterday?’29 At this retort Moses fled and became an exile in the land of Midian, where he became the father of two sons.

30 “Now when forty years had passed, an angel appeared to him in the wilderness of Mount Sinai, in a flame of fire in a bush. 31 When Moses saw it, he was amazed at the sight, and as he drew near to look, there came the voice of the Lord: 32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob.’ And Moses trembled and did not dare to look.33 Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off the sandals from your feet, for the place where you are standing is holy ground. 34 I have surely seen the affliction of my people who are in Egypt, and have heard their groaning, and I have come down to deliver them. And now come, I will send you to Egypt.’

35 “This Moses, whom they rejected, saying, ‘Who made you a ruler and a judge?’—this man God sent as both ruler and redeemer by the hand of the angel who appeared to him in the bush. 36 This man led them out, performing wonders and signs in Egypt and at the Red Sea and in the wilderness for forty years. 37 This is the Moses who said to the Israelites, ‘God will raise up for you a prophet like me from your brothers.’ 38 This is the one who was in the congregation in the wilderness with the angel who spoke to him at Mount Sinai, and with our fathers. He received living oracles to give to us. 39 Our fathers refused to obey him, but thrust him aside, and in their hearts they turned to Egypt,40 saying to Aaron, ‘Make for us gods who will go before us. As for this Moses who led us out from the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him.’ 41 And they made a calf in those days, and offered a sacrifice to the idol and were rejoicing in the works of their hands. 42 But God turned away and gave them over to worship the host of heaven, as it is written in the book of the prophets:

“‘Did you bring to me slain beasts and sacrifices,
    during the forty years in the wilderness, O house of Israel?
43 You took up the tent of Moloch
    and the star of your god Rephan,
    the images that you made to worship;
and I will send you into exile beyond Babylon.’

44 “Our fathers had the tent of witness in the wilderness, just as he who spoke to Mosesdirected him to make it, according to the pattern that he had seen. 45 Our fathers in turnbrought it in with Joshua when they dispossessed the nations that God drove out before our fathers. So it was until the days of David, 46 who found favor in the sight of God andasked to find a dwelling place for the God of Jacob.[a] 47 But it was Solomon who built a house for him. 48 Yet the Most High does not dwell in houses made by hands, as the prophet says,

49 “‘Heaven is my throne,
    and the earth is my footstool.
What kind of house will you build for me, says the Lord,
    or what is the place of my rest?
50 Did not my hand make all these things?’

51 “You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so do you. 52 Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who announced beforehand the coming of the Righteous One, whom you have now betrayed and murdered, 53 you who received the law as delivered by angels and did not keep it.”

The Stoning of Stephen

54 Now when they heard these things they were enraged, and they ground their teeth at him. 55 But he, full of the Holy Spirit, gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. 56 And he said, “Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.” 57 But they cried out with a loud voice and stopped their ears and rushed together[b] at him. 58 Then they cast him out of the city and stoned him. And the witnesses laid down their garments at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59 And as they were stoning Stephen, he called out, “Lord Jesus,receive my spirit.” 60 And falling to his knees he cried out with a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

25 December 1821 Birth of David Christian Ginsburg, missionary, scholar and exposer of fake Deuteronomy scroll #otdimjh

ginsburg 3

Bernstein summarises a distinguished academic career, but Ginsburg achieved public fame through his part in exposing one of the great frauds of the century, in disproving the claims of another fellow Jewish believer in Yeshua to have discovered an early manuscript of Deuteronomy which contained an 11th commandment.

Here is Bernstein’s note:

Ginsburg, Rev. Dr. Christian David, born at Warsaw, December 25, 1821, embraced Christianity there in 1846, was missionary of the British Society in Liverpool till 1863, when he retired in order to devote himself entirely to literary work. Dr. Ginsburg contributed a considerable number of valuable [234]  articles on Jewish topics to Kitto’s Encyclopædia, published a book on the Karaites and Essenes, and a full account in English of the Kabbalah, its doctrines, development, and literature. But he will be especially remembered for his massoretic studies, and translation of Elias Levita’s “Massoreth-ha-Massorah” in 1867, and of Jacob ben Hayim’s “Introduction to the Rabbinic Bible,” published in the same year. He was on the Revision Committee of the Old Testament. He edited the Massoretic Critical Text of the Hebrew Bible for the Trinitarian Bible Society, 1894, and also Salkinson’s translation of the New Testament into Hebrew, 1886.

The Athenæum

Shapira claimed to have discovered strips of ancient parchment from the bottom of Torah scrolls that contained different versions of the Deuteronomy sections of the 10 commandments and other passages. Ginsburg, by checking the linguistics and the details of the materials, declared these to be fakes and forgeries. Shapira, his career and reputation ruined, committed suicide.

The Times – centenary article 12-23-31

The case became a matter of popular gossip and discussion. Ginsburg, working with British Museum, applied scholarly techniques to expose the fraud, but it caught the popular imagination, and as two Jewish believers in Jesus were the main protagonists, led to antisemitic jokes and public derision.

PUNCH VOL 85

The incident was one of the most celebrated scholarly controversies of the nineteenth century. By examining the historical context, we can see that Ginsburg did more than simply expose a forgery. The entire episode symbolized the scholarly competence of the British and their approach to biblical archaeology and documents.

The Times – biblical forgery article 3-11-14

shapira.0

Ginsburg was truly an outstanding scholarly who left his mark on future critical editions of the biblical text. Jewish scholars noted his achievements in pioneering modern linguistic methods in studying the texts and manuscripts of the Tanach. But in his day the sensationalism of the forgery case was also what brought him to public attention.

Screen Shot 2014-12-25 at 08.42.07

Prayer: For your gifts of scholarship and wisdom, we give you thanks for the life of David Christian Ginsburg. Thank you for his dedication to your Word and the upholding of its authenticity in the face of sensationalist controversy. Help us also to be diligent in being faithful to the Scriptures and their interpretation, in the light of Yeshua and your ongoing faithfulness to your people Israel. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

Sources:

http://www.bl.uk/eblj/1995articles/pdf/article8.pdf

http://paleojudaica.blogspot.co.il/2013_11_03_archive.html#810475699851573000

THE TIME OF ISRAELIn the footsteps of a master forger: In 1883, respected antiques dealer Moses Wilhelm Shapira claimed to possess ancient scrolls of Deuteronomy. The text differed slightly from the accepted version: It had an 11th Commandment (Aviva and Shmuel Bar-Am).

http://theappendix.net/issues/2014/7/the-lying-pen-of-the-scribes-a-nineteenth-century-dead-sea-scroll

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_David_Ginsburg

http://www.jsasoc.com/Family_archive/ginsberg.htm

http://www.bl.uk/eblj/1995articles/pdf/article8.pdf

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6680-ginsburg-christian-david

English Masoretic scholar and Christian missionary; born at Warsaw Dec. 25, 1831. He was converted in 1846, and was for a time connected with the Liverpool branch of the London Society’s Mission to the Jews, but retired in 1863, devoting himself entirely to literary work. Besides editions of the Song of Songs, 1857, and Ecclesiastes, 1861, he published essays on the Karaites, 1862; and Essenes, 1864; and a full account in English of the Cabala, 1865.He then devoted himself to Masoretic studies, publishing the text and translation of Elias Levita’s “Massoret ha-Massoret” in 1867, and of Jacob b. Hayyim’s “Introduction to the Rabbinic Bible” in the same year. He was elected a member of the Board of Revisers of the Old Testament in 1870, and devoted himself to the collation of all the extant remains of the Masorah, three volumes of which he published in 1880-86. Based upon these collations, he edited a new text of the Old Testament for the Trinitarian Bible Society, which was published in 1894 under the title “The Massoretico-Critical Text of the Hebrew Bible.” To this he wrote an introduction, published together with a volume of facsimiles of the manuscripts of the Hebrew Bible, in 1897. His method of settling the Masoretic text has been somewhat severely criticized by Blau in the “Jewish Quarterly Review” (viii. 343 et seq.). Ginsburg wrote the most elaborate account printed in English of the Moabite Stone (1871), and was instrumental in exposing forgeries of Shapira.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

24 December 1804 Birth of Raphael Hirsch/Dr Joiachim Heinrich Biesenthal #otdimjh

Screen Shot 2014-12-23 at 16.59.31

Perhaps the greatest scholar of the 19th century Hebrew Christians, Biesenthal was widely known, but I have been unable to find a photograph of him. The account in Bernsteinreads:

Biesenthal, Dr. Joiachim Heinrich—or, to give him his birth-name, Raphael Hirsch—was born at Lobsens, in the Grand Duchy of Posen, on December 24th, 1804, of pious and strict Jewish parents. His early education was chiefly confined to the study of the national law and tradition; and through much self-denial and sacrifice on the part of his parents, who intended him for the rabbinate, he was able to have lessons from the best teachers and most learned Talmudist scholars of the day. He was what is called a Bachur (lit. “young man”), a student of the Beth Hamidrash, who is intended for the study of the law. The Talmudical principle, “Know well what to answer an infidel,” particularly moved his father to insist that he should join with the study of Talmud that of the Holy Scriptures and Jewish poetry. He soon found, however, that as regards his study of the Bible he was left to his own diligence and perseverance, for his teachers knew nothing at all about it; and, being imbued with the Talmudical warning—”Keep your children from the study of Holy Scripture,” they were of opinion that it was not only a useless study and waste of time, but also a danger to one’s piety.

In 1819, when Raphael was fifteen years of age, the town of Lobsens was destroyed by fire, by which his parents were ruined. His education, however, had to be completed, and so he entered the famous Jewish school of Rawitsch, where he received instruction [122] from rabbis, and principally from Rabbi Herzfeld, of European renown. Deprived of every assistance from home, young Raphael had to struggle hard during his four year’s residence there. On leaving Rawitsch he went to Mainz, where he received most kind care and support from the Rabbi of that city, Löb Ellinger, brother of the renowned Nathan Ellinger, or Nathan Bar Yospa, rabbi of Bingen, several of whose manuscripts are in the Bodleian.

Screen Shot 2014-12-23 at 16.55.55

The celebrated Heidenheim (Wolf Ben Samson) of Rödelheim, the greatest Jewish critic and grammarian after Ibn-Ezra and David Kimchi, helped him to the treasures of Jewish literature, lending him the best grammars in the Hebrew language, so that he was able to acquire, with great application on his part, a complete mastery of grammatical Hebrew. He next gave himself up to the study of German history, and Latin and Greek. His studies threw him into contact with the Rev. Dr. Klee, Roman Catholic Professor at Bonn, who gave him lessons in Hebrew, and introduced him to the Duchess of Coburg, the wife of General de Mensdorff, Governor of the fortress of Mainz. From her, and all the family, Raphael received many substantial proofs of kindness, and when he was about to leave Mainz, which he did in 1828, she gave him a considerable sum of money, and a letter written by herself to Baron de Rothschild, of Frankfort-on-the-Main, and graciously intimated that she would be glad to hear how he was getting on in life. Raphael found the Baron not inclined to assist him when he heard that he meant to finish his studies [123] at Berlin, because he considered that a dangerous city, where all young Jewish students were being converted to Christianity. That there was great truth in this statement will appear lower down. “Keep away from a city where thousands become apostates!” were his parting words. Baron de Rothschild, however, sent him a letter of recommendation to Baron de Hägemann, the Chancellor. When Raphael delivered the letter, the not unnatural remark was, “What is the use of a recommendation for assistance from Rothschild! Why did he not help you himself?” So he was obliged to shift for himself at Berlin, and to earn his living by giving lessons. He employed his leisure time in study. In the year 1830 he resided for four weeks with a Christian family at Havelberg, where he learnt for the first time what true Christianity was, and he determined, as he said, to “search for Christian truth.” In this purpose his intercourse with Christian divines greatly helped him. He studied theology and philology in the University of Berlin from 1828, taking his doctor’s degree in 1835. He studied under the Oriental scholar, William Vatke, and his knowledge of the Hebrew grammar was greatly increased by personal friendly intercourse with Dr. Gesenius, the distinguished Hebrew scholar, at Halle. Raphael was baptized in 1836 by the Rev. Dr. Kuntze, taking the Christian names of Joiachim Heinrich and the surname of Biesenthal.

That there was a considerable truth in Baron de Rothschild’s observation given above, is seen from the statistics of Jewish baptisms in those days. [124]

Dr. Kuntze, who was a resident clergyman at Berlin, was instrumental in leading many young Jews to Christ. He baptized eighty in eight years (1829-36), whilst the Society’s missionary, the Rev. W. Ayerst, baptized forty-two adult Jews in three years (1834-7). Altogether, 326 Jewish baptisms were registered in the Consistory at Berlin during the years 1830-37. A few years later (1844) the Rev. C. W. H. Pauli, the Society’s missionary, reported that there were above 1,000 converts resident in Berlin; and in 1850, as many as 2,500. They filled all ranks and stations, and were to be found in all the ministerial departments, and in the university.

In 1844, Biesenthal placed his services at the disposal of the Society, and in doing so, wrote: “My Biblical studies led me, after much searching and wandering for a long time, to find Him of whom Moses and the Prophets did write. This result, this light which God caused to shine in my darkness, I deem it my unrelenting duty to communicate to others yet living in darkness, because the Lord Himself says that we should not put our light under a bushel. The Apostles, as well as all the Fathers, were furthered by the same disposition of mind. ‘For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also,’ says the Lord. If Christ be our treasure, our heart must be entirely and undividedly His own, and all our talents devoted to the glory of His kingdom. Becoming a missionary seems to me the surest way to fulfil Christ’s commands. I have long considered it both a duty and a privilege to communicate to my brethren after [125] the flesh the message of salvation, and to employ those talents which God has given me for their welfare. My predilection for the above has often seemed to be a token of God’s will that I should shew my brethren from their very literature, as well as from the Bible, that the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hid in Christ, and that we can only know the Father through Him. During the last three years I have acted upon this conviction, and embraced every opportunity to prove to my brethren that the Gospel of Christ is the power of God unto salvation, and my anxious desire now is to be enabled to devote all my time to this pursuit.”

These earnest words are an echo of St. Paul’s, “My heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved” (Rom. x. 1). With this spirit and aim, Biesenthal entered upon his long missionary career of 37 years in connexion with this Society—active laborious years spent in Berlin (1844-1868) and Leipzig (1868-1881). Eloquent in the Scriptures, with a perfect command of Hebrew and wide knowledge of Talmud and rabbinical literature, he was thoroughly furnished for his life’s work. Those who knew him well believed that he had intellectual, literary and biblical qualifications in a most eminent degree, and that he was the best Hebrew scholar of their acquaintance. His knowledge of languages embraced—in addition to his native Polish—Hebrew, Latin, Greek, Syriac, Chaldee, Arabic, Ethiopic, Samaritan, French, German, Spanish, Italian and English. Never was missionary more highly gifted [126] with “tongues”—his equal in this respect is not to be found in the ranks of the London Jews’ Society; whilst with his pen he did even better service than with his lips in proclaiming “Jesus Christ and Him crucified” to his brethren after the flesh.

Biesenthal’s missionary life commenced on April 1st, 1844, as an assistant missionary in this Society’s mission at Berlin, under the Rev. C. W. H. Pauli, where he also undertook the editorship of “Records of Israel’s State and Prospects,” a monthly periodical designed to promote the Society’s work, to give treatises on Messianic passages of the Old Testament, to discuss Christian and Jewish doctrines, and to give attention to Jewish history and literature; he also wrote many articles for the “Dibre Emeth.” He continued to work in this humble capacity under the Rev. R. Bellson until 1868, when his great abilities found a recognition, even though tardy, by his appointment to the charge of a new mission station of the Society at Leipzig. This important city, the second in Saxony, and the seat of a university, had for many years been visited by the Society’s missionaries from Berlin at the time of the great fairs, when Jews assembled from all parts, and to whom large numbers of Old and New Testaments were sold. Biesenthal found some seventy or eighty Hebrew Christians living there, and subsequently gave it as his opinion that they might be “numbered by hundreds.” There was a small Jewish community of about 500, who, since 1849, had enjoyed the rights of citizenship. This may seem to have been but a small field of work [127] for a man of such attainments, but he was the only missionary to the Jews throughout the whole kingdom of Saxony; and, moreover, Leipzig was the resort of many foreign Jews from Poland, Russia, Turkey, Greece, Persia, and even from America, and thus altogether an important missionary centre. Apart from the visible results in the form of baptisms from Biesenthal’s labours, the indirect results were great and far-reaching. As a scholar his name was, for many years, a household word in Germany, and especially in those circles where the Jewish mission exerted its influence. His Commentaries on the Gospels and the Epistles to the Romans and the Hebrews, so eminently useful in mission work, obtained well-deserved eminence.

The mission field, as time went on, became less promising and fruitful, the Jews becoming infected with the socialism and rationalism in Germany, as taught in the universities, churches, schools, and other institutions. Zeal for missions almost died out; the Jews became the subject of much Anti-Semitism. The long pent-up enmity against them burst forth with great virulence. In Leipzig, as in other places, petitions were sent to the Government urging the withdrawal of their political rights and privileges. In return, the Jews paid back hatred by hatred.

This state of things led Dr. Biesenthal to take a gloomy view of the general position. In his last report but one he said: “Hurricanes of trouble are blowing from the four quarters of the earth against the Church and against the Gospel,” and added that [128] in such circumstances his report could not be a joyous one.

Dr. Biesenthal doubtless obtained more satisfaction from his literary than from his missionary labours; although, in his case, one was the complement of the other. A scholar he was emphatically, and a brilliant one withal, as his works abundantly and substantially testify; and as such he will be principally remembered.

His published works contained the following: “Auszüge aus dem Buche Sohar, mit Deutscher Uebersetzung” (1837), a proof from Jewish sources of the doctrine of the Trinity and other Christian verities; “Hebräisches und Chaldäisches Schulwörterbuch über das A.T.” (1836-7); “David Kimchi’s ספר השרשים or Liber Radicum” (1838-48), in collaboration with F. S. Lebrecht; “The Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England” (1840); “The Book of Psalms,” Hebrew text and Commentary (1841); “The Book of Isaiah,” Hebrew Text and Commentary (1841); “Chrestomathia Rabbinica Sive Libri Quatuor, etc.” (1844); “Menachem ben Serug’s Hebrew Lexicon” (1847); “Theologisch-Historische Studien” (1847); “Zur Geschichte der Christlichen Kirche,” etc. (1850); “Das Trostschreiben des Apostels Paulus an die Hebraer” (1878); and a Hebrew Translation of the Epistles to the “Hebrews and the Romans,” with Commentary (1857-8). He also wrote Commentaries on “St. Matthew’s Gospel, the Acts of the Apostles,” an Essay on “The Atonement”; and the “Life of Gerson.”[129]

In 1877, the University of Giessen conferred upon him the degree of Doctor of Divinity.

In his greatest work, the “History of the Christian Church,” intended for the special use of the Jews, he proved that they stood in close connexion with the early Church, by bringing prominently forward the history of Jewish believers who loved their Saviour devotedly and laboured successfully for the spread of the Gospel at the time of its first promulgation.

Prayer:Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, King of the Universe,
who has given of His knowledge to flesh and blood.  

Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, King of the Universe,
who has apportioned of His knowledge to those who revere Him.  
 

Thank you, Lord, for the life and work of Raphael Hirsch – his lasting contribution of scholarship and his effective witness to the Messiah. Lord, we need men and women of his gifts and character today. Help us to study his work, and study his life and character, so that those fruits of knowledge, wisdom and grace may be manifested in our lives also. In Yeshua, the living Word of truth, we pray. Amen.

Sources:

http://www.ha-gefen.org.il/len/aalphabetic%20presentation/c13756/151283.php

http://ffoz.org/_search/search.php?zoom_query=Biesenthal&x=0&y=0

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3288-biesenthal-joachim-heinrich

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

23 December 1892 Death of Paul (Selig) Cassel, writer, parliamentarian, theologian and opponent of Anti-Semitism #otdimjh

cassel

Feb. 27, 1821, in Gross-Glogau, Silesia; died Dec. 23, 1892, in Friedenau, near Berlin

The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906) gives a short summary to a longer article:

Convert to Christianity and missionary to the Jews; born Feb. 27, 1821, in Gross-Glogau, Silesia; died Dec. 23, 1892, in Friedenau, near Berlin. His father was a sculptor, and his brother David was a rabbi and teacher at the Berlin “Hochschule für die Wissenschaft des Judenthums.” Cassel studied at the gymnasium at Schweidnitz and at the University of Berlin, where he followed with special attention the lectures of Leopold Ranke. In 1849 he edited in Erfurt “Die Constitutionelle Zeitung,” and in 1850-56 “Die Erfurter Zeitung,” in a royalist spirit. He was baptized May 28, 1855, in Buessleben, near Erfurt, and became librarian of the Royal Library and secretary of the Academy in Erfurt in the following year. He remained in Erfurt till 1859. Frederick William IV. bestowed the title of professor on Cassel in recognition of his loyal labors. In 1860 he removed to Berlin, where he was a teacher at a gymnasium for a short time, and occupied himself with literary work. In 1866-67 he was a Conservative member of the Prussian Chamber of Deputies. (Jewish Encylclopedia)

book2 cassel

Bernstein gives a longer account, quoting the favourable comments of the Jewish Chronicle:

Cassel, Paulus (Selig), was one of the most distinguished Hebrew Christians whom Germany produced during the 19th century, and one of the most remarkable missionaries ever in the Society’s ranks.

Speaking of the necessity of writing a history of converted Jews, the “Jewish Chronicle” said that the [158] most important chapter of it would be that which, concerning Germany, contained the lives of such men as Benfey, Bernhardy, Lehrs, Neander and Veith; and after them should be mentioned Cassel, who became a pillar of the Reformed Church, and acknowledged that “a genius like Cassel is always an honour to his former brethren in the faith,” whilst wondering that one who observed for so many years the Jewish ceremonial laws, ate at the table of Jacob Joseph Ettinger, the rabbi of Berlin, who was the admirer of Michael Sachs, and the author of the article, “History of the Jews,” in Ersch and Grüber’s great “Encyclopædia of Science,” could have embraced the Christian faith.[10] It was indeed a strange spectacle, and a sorrowful one withal, for every Jew with any feeling whatever, to see Paulus Cassel teaching Christianity in the same city of Berlin, where his brother, David, was a well-known rabbi, training young men for the Jewish ministry.

book cassel

We must, however, first speak of his early years. Selig Cassel, to give him his Jewish name, was born at Glogau, in Silesia, on February 27th, 1821, of Jewish parents. He was educated at the Gymnasia of Glogau and Schweidnitz, and subsequently at the university of Berlin, where he made a special study of history as a pupil of the famous historian, Dr. Ranke.

cassel book

Cassel took his degree at Berlin and Licentiatus Theologiæ in due course, and received the faculty for headmaster for all classes of the gymnasium in Latin,[159] Greek, theology, history, geography and German literature. He then, for a time, was on the journalistic staff of the “Constitutionelle Zeitung” in Berlin. Afterwards, in 1850, Cassel went to Erfurt, where he was the editor of the “Erfurter Zeitung” from 1850 to 1856.

Screen Shot 2014-12-23 at 08.31.35

His Christian friends, and especially, according to his own statement, his study of the history of Israel, led him to Christianity, which he embraced in 1855, being baptized at Büssleben, a village near Erfurt, on May 28, and receiving the names “Paulus Stephanus.” Every year subsequently he was wont to celebrate this “second birthday,” as he called it, amidst his friends and congregation.

We now come to the second period of Cassel’s life, as a renowned Christian writer, preacher and orator. For a few years Cassel remained in the town, where the great change in his life had taken place, and became custodian of the public library and secretary of the “Erfurt Academy.” He was then called to Berlin by the Prime Minister, who entrusted him with the editorship of the official “Deutsche Reform.” He resigned this post in six months’ time to return to his beloved books and studies at Erfurt.

At this time honours were showered upon him. King Frederick William IV. of Prussia honoured him with the title of “Professor.” The University of Erlangen conferred on him the degree of “Licentiatus Theologiæ.” Afterwards, in Vienna, Cassel obtained that of “Doctor Theologiæ” (Doctor of Divinity). In 1859 he returned to Berlin and delivered public [160] lectures, which were more and more largely attended and appreciated by both Jews and Gentiles. These lectures made him known throughout the capital and the country.

Berlin_Abgeordnetenhaus_1900

Dr. Cassel was elected a member of the “Landtag,” the Prussian Parliament, in 1866, and became a prominent member of the Conservative party. As this took him too much from his literary work, he soon laid this mandate down.

In 1868, the third and most famous portion of Cassel’s life commenced, when the Society appointed him their missionary in Berlin and minister of Christ Church, a stately Gothic building, with over a thousand sittings, erected by the Society in the Wilhelmstrasse, in 1864.

For twenty-three years many children of Israel heard the Gospel from Dr. Cassel’s lips both in Berlin and other places of Germany, and indeed of Europe. The good done by means of his sermons and lectures can never be fully estimated; and, in addition to this, numbers of Jews were influenced in a Christian direction by his numerous publications.

It would be impossible for us to follow the indefatigable missionary in his multifarious activities in Berlin and in Germany generally during these busy years; but we may be allowed to quote from a published letter which he addressed in 1887 to English friends, entitled, “Thoughts on the Jewish Mission”:

“Invitations came to give lectures in places at a distance. A dear friend of mine shewed me in 1860 a map of Germany, on which he marked all the towns [161] in which I have lectured. Since then I have delivered over a thousand original lectures in Berlin and elsewhere. God’s hand has guided me everywhere. My journeys have extended from Amsterdam to Buda-Pesth. I always had an attentive audience, and the poorer people in both large and small towns heard the Word with gladness—nay, even with enthusiasm.

“During the anti-Semitic agitation, such journeys for the purpose of delivering lectures were more extensive. I had then become known through my defence of Gospel charity, even in circles which were not outwardly known as Christian. The meetings which were held at the period resembled more nearly the ideal at which I aimed. A considerable number of persons listened to the lectures, who had completely turned their backs on the Church.”

Speaking of his ministerial and missionary work in Christ Church, the doctor said:

“The special blessing of the Church consisted in the regular exposition of the Old Testament. It has been my custom to expound the Old Testament every Sunday evening, from the first Sunday I came into office (Jan. 5th, 1868) up to the present time. It was the first time in Berlin that this was made a practice. There were, therefore, from the very beginning hearers, consisting of Jews and earnest Christians. Those expository sermons have been the greatest blessing, and have specially united me to the congregation.”

Professor Cassel baptized 262 Jews in Christ [162] Church; amongst them doctors, authors, merchants, nearly all educated persons. But, as he said, “I am not fond of statistics. I sow the seed, but do not stop to ask how much may be the fruit.”

Dr. Cassel was an ardent lover of his own people. “Though he has left us, he was by no means our enemy. He still fights against those who hate the Jews,” said the “Jewish Chronicle.” It was he who raised his voice against Stöcker in Berlin, and endeavoured by voice and pen to soften down the excitement and anger of German Protestants, and to secure the peace of his former brethren in the faith.

In the spring of 1891, when he retired from his duties, Dr. Cassel did not cease to preach, wherever an occasion offered, and he continued to write. So great was his love and zeal that he could not forego instructing and baptizing Jews who wished to become members of the Church of Christ through his instrumentality. The number of his converts must exceed some hundreds. Many of them were in high positions, and residing in various parts of the world.

jnk1cassel0212

Dr. Cassel’s death took place, after great sufferings, on December 23rd, 1893, his last words being, “Wo ist denn das Himmelreich?” [“Where is the kingdom of Heaven?”] His funeral was held on December 27th in the afternoon. In Christ Church, where the coffin had been placed before the communion-table, a funeral sermon was preached by the Rev. Pastor Weser from St. John i. 12. The Rev. Dr. Dryander, the General Superintendent of the Lutheran community, also addressed the congregation. After the service within the sacred edifice the[163] obsequies were completed, in the presence of a large concourse of friends, at the old Jerusalem Cemetery, where Dr. Cassel’s mortal remains lie in their last resting-place.

Bernstein concludes: Such, in conclusion, was this truly wonderful son of Israel, and follower of Christ. His gigantic intellect, marvellous ability, persuasive oratory, brilliant pen, were alike consecrated to the service of his Lord and Master, and to the spiritual welfare of his brethren. Sage, philosopher, scholar, author, preacher and missionary, he was a king amongst his fellow-men. His name will live immortal in the annals of Jewish and Jewish missionary literature.

For more information see below. Let us pause an consider what this means for Messianic Jews today:

1. Here is a gifted Jewish believer in Yeshua who identifies with his people, opposes rising antisemitism in Germany, occupies positions in teaching, journalism and public office.

2. Cassel’s achievements are welcomed and acknowledged by the Jewish media and organisations.

3. Cassel is a dedicated evangelist among his people, working with the London Society for the Promotion of Christianity among the Jews (CMJ).

4. There is as yet no strong expression of Jewish Christianity or Messianic Judaism apart from the personal contributions and identity construction of a number of gifted and publicly recognisable individuals.

5. We have a long way to go in the Messianic Jewish movement of the 21st century before we as Messianic Jews can claim to have made such a contribution or have such an impact on either Jewish, Christian or secular society.

With those thoughts in mind, here is my prayer:

Father in Heaven, thank you for showing us the way you have worked in the past, and in the lives of men such as Paulus Selig Stephanus Cassell, a man of great ability who gave himself to your service. Raise up today amongst your people Israel those who will share their faith in Yeshua, fully identifying with the concerns and issues that face the Jewish people, and calling on their behalf for support, recognition and justice within the conflicts and challenges we face today. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen.

If you share that prayerful concern, do let me know. Thanks!

Cassel_Paul

We append a few testimonies to the life, example, and powerful influence of Dr. Cassel:

Mr. C. Urbschat, of Königsberg, who for several years worked under Dr. Cassel in Berlin, wrote of his labours:

“Professer Cassel was a highly educated missionary, and showed extraordinary ability in influencing the higher classes of Jews in favour of Christianity by his lectures and by his pleadings on their behalf. He was a man of profound learning, of great diligence, and of restless zeal in propagating the Gospel of his Master amongst Jews and Christians.”

The “Allgemeine Zeitung des Judenthums” said: “When the anti-Semites began to show themselves, Cassel remembered his origin, and opposed the leaders, Stöcker, Wagner, and others with great decision and manliness. It was this manly action that gives us some satisfaction for his desertion of the parental religion. We have to judge this apostasy very differently from that of many others in former and present times, as he did not forsake his old creed for any worldly reason, or to get honours and position, but rather because he followed a mystical line of thought. God alone can judge the veracity and purity of his life; we dare not. ‘Peace be to his ashes!’”

Of the two brothers who, though divided in life,[164] died about the same time, the Jewish Chronicle remarked:—”The deaths of David and Paulus (formerly Selig) Cassel remove two brothers, both of whom had won a place for themselves among the honoured names of Jewish scholarship…. Paulus was the greater man of the two, a scholar and writer of a higher type, and his works will live. He took a worthy part in the struggle against anti-Semitism. Paulus Cassel was perhaps the first man to recognise what was really meant by writing a history of the Jews.”

One of Dr. Cassel’s numerous converts, baptized by him in 1870, sent the following most touching tribute to his memory:—”There was no way of his life in which he failed to shine. Study and knowledge sealed in his heart the great truths of religion. His was the faith which is clothed in wisdom; his the wisdom which is hallowed by faith. His faith was to him, as it should be to all of us, an armed angel. His affectionate heart not only throbbed with love for his own kindred, but was alive to sympathy with those who needed it. I always found him benevolent and singularly gentle. He taught the world that the Jew, hitherto despised, must be despised no more; he conquered a place in society, in the highest society—the intellectual circle—for the people of his faith. And this victory he won, not by dint of clamour, or falseness, or obstrusive self-assertion, but by the force of his own intellectual powers, his unsullied integrity, his admirable character. Dr. Cassel gave mankind a useful lesson, a touching example, a glorious spectacle: he showed how a Christian Jew lives! His knowledge[165] was the altar on which he stood to worship the great God-man! History confirms the truth, which the Psalmist, whose music he loved, taught mankind ages ago—that, ‘The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.’”

The industry of Dr. Cassel was truly prodigious, and was especially evidenced by the large number and character of his writings.

A complete list of all his books and pamphlets would fill a large space, so mention can be made only of his more important writings, namely:—”Juden Geschichte” in Ersch and Grüber (1847), “Magyarische Altertumer” (1848), “Von Warschau bis Olmutz” (1851), “Thüringische Ortsnamen” (1856-58), “Eddische Studien” (1856), “Rose und Nachtigall” (1860), “Weihnachten, Ursprünge, Bräuche und Aberglauben” (1862), “Die Schwalbe” (1869), “Drachenkämpfe” (1869), “Vom Wege nach Damascus” (1872), “Name und Beruf” (1874), “Löwenkämpfe von Nemea bis Golgotha” (1875), “Das Buch Esther” (1878), translated by the Rev. A. Bernstein into English and published by T. and T. Clark of Edinburgh (1888), “Vom Nil zum Ganges” (1879), “Christliche Sittenlehre” (1880), “Aus literatur und Symbolik” (1884), “Sabbatarche Errinerungen,” “Die Hochzeit von Cana” (1884), “Aus Literatur und Geschichte” (1885), “Aus dem Lande des Sonnenaufgangs” (1885), “Kritische Sendschreiben über die Probebibel” (1885), “Wie ich über Judenmission denke” (1886), “Das 900 jährige Jubiläum der russischen Kirche” (1888), “Aletheia, Vorträge” (1890), “Das 1000 jährige[166] Reich” (1890). For Lange’s Bible-Commentary he wrote the expositions on the books of Judges and Ruth. His works against anti-Semitism were “Wider Heinrich von Treitschke für die Juden” (1880), “Die Antisemiten und die Evangelische Kirche” (1881), “Ahasverus” (1885), and “Der Judengott und Richard Wagner.” Dr. Cassel composed many poems under the title, “Hallelujah,” containing 188 hymns, and also some dramas (Vom Könige, Das neue Schauspiel, Der Weiner Congress, Paulus at Damascus, Paulus at Cyprus, &c.)

From 1875-91 Dr. Cassel edited and published a weekly paper, “For Christian life and knowledge,” entitled “Sunem.”

Such, in conclusion, was this truly wonderful son of Israel, and follower of Christ. His gigantic intellect, marvellous ability, persuasive oratory, brilliant pen, were alike consecrated to the service of his Lord and Master, and to the spiritual welfare of his brethren. Sage, philosopher, scholar, author, preacher and missionary, he was a king amongst his fellow-men. His name will live immortal in the annals of Jewish and Jewish missionary literature.

Dr. Cassel, whose great work has already been recorded,* died on December 23rd, 1892, after 23 years’ strenuous service. He was a most remarkable and distinguished missionary ; a brilliant Hebrew and Talmudical scholar, and a most voluminous author. His eloquence and popularity as a preacher and lecturer were renowned not merely in Berlin itself, but throughout all Germany. God’s blessing rested on his indefatigable labours on behalf of the Jews, a very large   • See pages 347 and 433.     544 AMONG THE CONTINENTAL JEWRIES [1891   number of whom he was instrumental in bringing into the Church of Christ. His ardent love for his Jewish brethren also shewed itself in the valiant manner in which he espoused their cause during the anti-Semitic troubles in Germany.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulus_Stephanus_Cassel

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/4114-cassel-paulus-stephanus-selig

The unedited full-text of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia

 http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/16th-february-1889/27/an-explanatory-commentary-on-esther-by-professor-p

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

21 December 1878 Naphtali Imber writes Hatikvah (“the Hope”), Israel’s national anthem #otdimjh

imber2

“My heart is conquered by the Gospel, but my head does not agree with it.”

Naphtali Zvi Imber (1856 – 8 October 1909), “Israel’s first bohemian”, was born in Złoczów (now Zolochiv, Ukraine), in Galicia. In his youth he travelled in Hungary, Serbia, and Romania, and the tune of HaTikvah is influenced especially by Romanian folk music.

LaurenceOliphant

In 1882 Imber moved to Ottoman Palestine as a secretary of Sir Laurence Oliphant, a Christadelphian and Christian Zionist who had a messianic and mystical expectation of the Jewish return to Zion. Imber lived with Oliphant and his wife Alice in their homes in Haifa and Daliyat al-Karmel. In 1883, Imber left the Oliphants and moved to Jerusalem, where he became ill and stayed in the London Society Hospital, preferring it to the lice and poor treatment of the Rothschild Hospital.

Hermann Friedlander, a CMJ missionary, Jewish believer in Yeshua and friend of Lucky, spent time with him discussing the claims of Yeshua. He spent six months there, deflecting the missionary Friedlander’s attempts to persuade him. Imber conveyed his hesitations to Friedlander: “My heart is conquered by the Gospel [tidings], but my head does not agree with it.” However, he stressed the good treatment he received at the mission’s hospital, and the fact that many of the nobles of Jerusalem use its services.

500px-Bet_Oliphant_-_Haifa_(7)

During his stay in Palestine, Imber lived in abject poverty. He was notorious for his excessive drinking, eccentric behaviour and questionable contact with Christian missionaries; yet he became renowned as a Hebrew poet, and his song “Hatikva” became popular in the new colonies. He published several poems and articles in the Jerusalem Hebrew newspapers, Havatzelet and Hazvi.

barkai

In 1886, he published his first book of poems, Morning Star (Hebrew: ברקאי, Barkai‎), in Jerusalem. One of the book’s poems was Tikvateinu (“Our Hope”); its very first version was written yet in 1877 in Iaşi, Romania. This poem later became the Israeli national anthem Hatikvah.

The melody was based on “La Mantovana”, a 16th-century Italian song that Samuel Cohen adapted as a setting for the poem in 1888. To hear Barbra Streisand singing it, see here

כל עוד בלבב פנימה
נפש יהודי הומיה,
ולפאתי מזרח קדימה
עין לציון צופיה –עוד לא אבדה תקותנו,
התקוה בת שנות אלפים,
להיות עם חופשי בארצנו
ארץ ציון וירושלים.
Kol ‘od balevav P’nimah –
Nefesh Yehudi homiyah
Ulfa’atey mizrach kadimah
Ayin l’tzion tzofiyah.‘Od lo avdah tikvatenu
Hatikvah bat shnot alpayim:
Li’hyot am chofshi b’artzenu –
Eretz Tzion Virushalayim.
As long as in the heart, within,
A Jewish soul still yearns,
And onward toward the East,
An eye still watches toward Zion.Our hope has not yet been lost,
The two thousand year old hope,
To be a free nation in our own homeland,
The land of Zion and Jerusalem.

In 1887 Imber returned to Europe and lived in London; then travelled again, visited India and finally moved to the United States in 1892. Imber made a mockery of the serious and had a sardonic vulgar wit. He also translated the Omar Khayyam into Hebrew. He died in New York in 1909 from the effects of chronic alcoholism. 100,000 people attended his funeral, out of tribute to his composition, Hatikvah.

Imber had contact with Christian missionaries in Israel, India, England and American. His friend and rival Israel Zangwill mocked him for it in Children of the Ghetto. Zangwill there describes his fictional character, the “neo-Hebrew” poet Pinchas Malchitsedek:

The same bent of mind, the same individuality of distorted insight made him overflow with ingenious explanations of the Bible and the Talmud, with new views and new lights on history, philology, medicine—anything, everything. And he believed his ideas because they were his and in himself because of his ideas. To himself his stature sometimes seemed to expand till his head touched the Sun—but that was mostly after wine—and his brain retained a permanent glow from the contact.

Zangwill: “That such a poet should have written Hatikvah, the Marseillaise of every Zionist meeting throughout the world, is one of the innumerable ironies of Jewish history.”

Menachem Begin: Hatikvah “became the song of the Jewish heart of our historic longing, of our love for the land of Zion and Jerusalem.”

Prayer: Thank you Lord for the life and work of Naftali Imber. May we too be travellers through time, culture and ideas. Help us to keep living, learning and loving. Thank you for the words Imber wrote, that have given strength and inspiration of generations of your people Israel. Help us to find our true faith and identity in you, and in your son, our Messiah. In his name we pray. Amen.

Sources:

Naftali Herz Imber and Hatikvah The “Erratic Genius,” the National Anthem, and the Famous Melody by Cecil Bloom

http://www.midstreamthf.com/2012spring/feature.html

Children of the Ghetto: A Study of a Peculiar People

By Israel Zangwill

http://jewishcurrents.org/december-22-hope-23648

http://geography.huji.ac.il/.upload/RuthPub/127.pdf

REFERENCE: Kark, R. and Langboim, S., “Missions and Identity Formation among the People of Palestine: the Case of the Jewish Population.” In N. Friedrich, U. Kaminsky and R. Löffler, (eds.), The Social Dimension of Mission in the Middle East, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stüttgart,

2010, pp. 101-120.

Boaz Huss: FORWARD, TO THE EAST: NAPTHALI HERZ IMBER’S PERCEPTION OF KABBALAH

Journal of Modern Jewish Studies Vol 12, No. 3 November 2013, pp. 398–418

ISSN 1472-5886 print/ISSN 1472-5894 online © 2013 Taylor & Francis

http://www.tandfonline.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14725886.2013.826464

https://www.academia.edu/5488119/Forward_to_the_East_Naphtali_Herz_Imber_Perception_of_Kabbalah

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAzwde3Z0uo

Forward to the East: Zionism,Esotericism and Orientalism in Naftali Herz Imber’s Perception of Kabbalah Boaz Huss

http://www.midstreamthf.com/2012spring/feature.html

http://jafi.org/NR/rdonlyres/8DDCF5CE-5D1B-4E38-A36D-E322627D8AF4/54846/CZAHatikvahimpressions.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatikvah

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

21 December 1804 Birth of Benjamin Disraeli, Jewish Prime Minister #otdimjh

“Yes, I am a Jew, and when the ancestors of the right honourable gentleman were brutal savages in an unknown island, mine were priests in the temple of Solomon.”

Miss Sands told me that Queen Victoria, who was latterly éprise with Disraeli, one day asked him what was his real religion. “Madam,” he replied, “I am the blank page between the Old Testament and the New.”

“I don’t wish to go down to posterity talking bad grammar.”

220px-Disraeli

Bernstein claims of Disraeli:

Disraeli, Benjamin, Earl of Beaconsfield, born in London, December 21, 1804, died there April 19, 1881. Of this preeminently distinguished man in the nineteenth century there are many biographies and lasting monuments. We need only record very briefly here that he was one of England’s greatest sons and statesmen, and the greatest ornament of the Jewish people in modern times. An ardent lover of his nation, a genuine English patriot, a friend of his great Queen, a thorough Protestant Churchman, yet with liberal tendencies, and a true believer in Christianity, which he regarded as completed Judaism. His works are these: “Vivian Grey,” 1817; “The Infernal Marriage;” “Ixion in Heaven,” and “Popanilla,” 1828; “Contarini Fleming,” and “The Wondrous Tale of Alroy,” 1832; “The Young Duke,” about that time; “What is he?” 1833; “Revolutionary Epic,” 1834; “Coningsby,” 1844; “Tancred,” 1847; “Sybil,” 1845;[190]“The rise of Iskander,” “Vindication of the British Constitution,” “Venetia,” “Henrietta Temple,” “The Tragedy of Count Alarcos,” and “Lothair,” were all productions of his great intellect at different seasons. Benjamin’s mother, his sister Sarah, born 1802, his brother Ralph, 1809, and his brother James, 1813, were all Hebrew Christians.

Bernstein also notes of Isaac Disraeli, Benjamin’s father:

Disraeli, Isaac, left the synagogue in 1817. Though we have no definite information about his baptism, we may reasonably assume that he was a member of the Church of England. This appears from his having his children baptized, from his pamphlet, “The Spirit of Judaism,” in which he vindicated himself for the step he had taken, from his articles on “The Talmud,” “Psalm Singing,” the Pearl Bibles and six thousand errata in his “Curiosities of literature,” &c., all shewing that he was an earnest student of religious subjects and of the Scriptures, and that he endeavoured to spread the light of truth.

Isaac D’Israeli had never taken religion very seriously, but had remained a conforming member of the Bevis Marks Synagogue. His father, the elder Benjamin, was a prominent and devout member; it was probably from respect for him that Isaac did not leave when he fell out with the synagogue authorities in 1813. After Benjamin senior died in 1816 Isaac felt free to leave the congregation following a second dispute. His friend Sharon Turner, a solicitor, convinced him that although he could comfortably remain unattached to any formal religion it would be disadvantageous to the children if they did so. Turner stood as godfather when Benjamin was baptised, aged twelve, on 31 July 1817.

A short post cannot do justice to this political giant, a complex personality and imposing presence, who continues to leave his mark on British political life and is claimed as a member of the Jewish community despite, perhaps even because, of what he was able to achieve because of his ‘conversion’. He was an ambitious socialite, a prolific writer and novelist, a political maverick and turncoat, a companion and favourite of Queen Victoria, a shrewd but flawed politician. Whatever his real faith, he is claimed as both Jewish and Christian, one of the best-known examples of Homi Bhaba’s model of hybridity and heteroglossic identity in his “location of culture”.  But my favourite assessment of his is that of Randolph Churchill, who described his career progressing through as a series of stages:

“Failure, failure, failure, partial success, renewed failure, ultimate and complete victory.”

Screen Shot 2014-12-21 at 09.06.59

churchill, randolph (1)

Prayer: Lord, you order the nations and assign their leaders, both potentates and politicians. In this multifaceted character whose ambition, integrity and purpose we still ponder with fascination we see one of the greatest achieving members of Israel in modern times. Help us to learn from his example, but also to be wise as to the inner workings of his heart and faith.

http://www.victorianweb.org/history/pms/dizzy.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Disraeli

Posted in otdimjh | 2 Comments

20 December 1997 Passing of Denise Levertov, Paul Levertoff’s poetess daughter

440px-Denise_Levertov_edit

Denise Levertov (24 October 1923 – 20 December 1997) was one of the most acclaimed American poets of the 20th century

She was born and grew up in Ilford, Essex, a suburb to which Jewish immigrants from Russia and Poland moved after arriving in the East End of London. Her father, Paul Levertoff, had been a teacher at Leipzig University and as a Russian Hassidic Jew was held under house arrest during the First World War as an ‘enemy alien’ by virtue of his ethnicity. He became a believer in Yeshua in 1895 and moved to England, where he became an Anglican priest and pioneering Hebrew Christian, translator of the Zohar, and writer. Her mother, Beatrice Adelaide (née Spooner-Jones) Levertoff, came from a small mining village in North Wales.

Denise wrote, “My father’s Hasidic ancestry, his being steeped in Jewish and Christian scholarship and mysticism, his fervour and eloquence as a preacher, were factors built into my cells”. She was home-schooled, showing an enthusiasm for writing from an early age and studied ballet, art, piano and French as well as standard subjects.

She wrote about the strangeness she felt growing up part Jewish, German, Welsh and English, but not fully belonging to any of these identities. She felt lent her a she was special rather than excluded: “[I knew] before I was ten that I was an artist-person and I had a destiny”.

levertov y0ung

When she was five years old she declared she would be a writer. At the age of 12, she sent some of her poems to T. S. Eliot (who knew her father), who replied with a two-page letter of encouragement. In 1940, when she was 17, Levertov published her first poem. During the Blitz, Levertov served in London as a civilian nurse. Her first book, The Double Image, was published six years later.

double image

In 1947, she married American writer Mitchell Goodman and moved to the United States in 1948. Although they divorced in 1975, having one son, Nikolai. In 1955, she became an American citizen.

Levertov’s first two books had comprised poems written in traditional forms and language. She was influenced by the Black Mountain poets and William Carlos Williams. Her first American book of poetry, Here and Now, shows the beginnings of this transition and transformation. Her poem “With Eyes at the Back of Our Heads” (below) established her reputation.

With_Eyes_At_The_Back_Of_Our_Heads_300_451

During the 1960s and 70s, Levertov became much more politically active in her life and work. As poetry editor for The Nation, she was able to support and publish the work of feminist and other leftist activist poets. The Vietnam War was an especially important focus of her poetry, which often tried to weave together the personal and political, as in her poem “The Sorrow Dance,” which speaks of her sister Olga’s death

… how you always
loved that cadence, ‘Underneath
are the everlasting arms’—
all history
burned out, down
to the sick bone, save for

that kind candle.

stream

In 1990 she joined the Catholic Church at St. Edwards, Seattle, In 1997, she brought together 38 poems from seven of her earlier volumes in The Stream & the Sapphire, a collection intended, as Levertov explains in the foreword to the collection, to “trace my slow movement from agnosticism to Christian faith, a movement incorporating much doubt and questioning as well as affirmation.”

oblique

From A Poet’s Valediction Nicholas O’Connell

Did your understanding of poetic inspiration help to imagine what it would be like to have religious faith?

That’s one way of putting it. When you’re really caught up in writing a poem, it can be a form of prayer. I’m not very good at praying, but what I experience when I’m writing a poem is close to prayer. I feel it in different degrees and not with every poem. But in certain ways writing is a form of prayer.

Is prayer similar to poetic inspiration, in that you can’t force it, but simply must wait and hope for it?

But you do have to focus your attention. I was really amazed at how close the exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola were to a poet or novelist imagining a scene. You focus your attention on some particular aspect of the life of Christ. You try to compose that scene in your imagination, place yourself there. If it’s the Via Dolorosa, you have to ask yourself, are you one of the disciples? Are you a passerby? Are you a spectator that likes to watch from the side, the way people used to watch hangings? You establish who you are and where you stand and then you look at what you see. –

great unknowing

Richard’s Prayer:

For what You have given us

In Denise, in Paul, in Olga and Beatrice

We give You thanks

 

For what You have made us

In darkness and doubt

In pain and in pointlessness

We cry out for help

 

For what You have done for us

In giving us life

In transforming our hope

In sending Yeshua

We write in the lines of our lives

revolution

Sources and resources:

Dana Greene Denise Levertov: A Poet’s Life (2012).

Levertov-book-cover-dana

Donna Krolik Hollenberg, A Poet’s Revolution: The Life of Denise Levertov (2013)

Final Interview  http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/g_l/levertov/oconnell.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denise_Levertov

With eyes at the back of our heads/Denis Levertov

With eyes at the back of our heads

we see a mountain

not obstructed with woods but laced

here and there with feathery groves.

 

The doors before us a facade

that perhaps has no house in back of it

are too narrow, and one is set high

with no doorsill. The architect sees

the imperfect proposition and

turns eagerly to the knitter.

 

Set it to rights!

The knitter begins to knit.

For we want

to enter the house, if there is a house,

to pass through the doors at least

into whatever lies beyond them,

we want to enter the arms

of the knitted garment. As one

is re-formed, so the other,

in proportion.

 

When the doors widen

when the sleeves admit us

the way to the mountain will clear,

the mountain we see with

eyes at the back of our heads, mountain

green, mountain

cut of limestone, echoing

with hidden rivers, mountain

of short grass and subtle shadows.

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

19 December 1808 Birth of Horatius Bonar, hymn-writer, philosemite and brother of Andrew Bonar #otdimjh

horatius1

I heard the voice of Jesus say, “Come unto Me and rest;

Lay down, thou weary one, lay down Thy head upon My breast.”

I came to Jesus as I was, weary and worn and sad;

I found in Him a resting place, and He has made me glad.

 

I heard the voice of Jesus say, “Behold, I freely give

The living water; thirsty one, stoop down, and drink, and live.”

I came to Jesus, and I drank of that life giving stream;

My thirst was quenched, my soul revived, and now I live in Him.

 

I heard the voice of Jesus say, “I am this dark world’s Light;

Look unto Me, thy morn shall rise, and all thy day be bright.”

I looked to Jesus, and I found in Him my Star, my Sun;

And in that light of life I’ll walk, till traveling days are done.

This was one of my favourite hymns as a young believer. I wonder how many Messianic Jews have loved its simple directness, its inviting warmth, and its call to discipleship. So I include Horatius Bonar as a significant entry into Messianic Jewish history. On another occasion we will review the life and work of his brother Andrew, one of four Church of Scotland ministers (along with Robert Murray McCheyne) who undertook a “Mission of Inquiry to the Jews” which began the work of the Church of Scotland in Israel and Hungary in 1841.

Screen Shot 2014-12-19 at 08.00.01

Horatius Bonar(19 December 1808 – 31 May 1889) has been called “the prince of Scot­tish hymn writers.” After graduating from the University of Edinburgh, he was ordained in 1838, and became pastor of the North Parish, Kelso. He joined the Free Church of Scot­land after the “Disruption” of 1843, and for a while edited the church’s “The Border Watch”. Bonar remained in Kelso for 28 years, after which he moved to the Chalmers Memorial church in Edinburgh, where he served the rest of his life. Bonar wrote more than 600 hymns.

Horatius Bonar was an advocate for the Jewish people and ministry amongst them. A great preacher and writer, his prose reflects the poetics and rhetorical skills of 19th century preaching at its best. It also reflects a reverse typology of Christians as the younger brother – Abel, Isaac, Jacob – and Jews as the older – Cain, Ishmael, Esau – an unfortunate figuration which plays into the hands of a supersessionist rendition of the relationship between the Church and Israel. But we should not hold this against him, as he was a child of his time, and did the best he could with the theological tradition he inherited. Here is some of his material:

The people of Israel present a most interesting subject for contemplation, and a large sphere for labor. Do you want an important theme to think upon? Here it is. Do you want a field in which to work? Behold it here. Surely no one who thinks on the past history of the Jews, or their present condition or future destiny, can complain of lack of interest in the subject before them. In the Jews we see a people by whom the Bible was written, and to whom, either as history or prophecy, a large part of it refers. These are the fathers, the prophets,and the types; from them came the Savior and his apostles. The lovers of antiquity, the admirers of the marvelous, the expectants of wonders, may all come here and not fear disappointment. Here there is much revealed that is most valuable; and two things, above all others in importance, may be learned by studying the history and prophecies of this wonderful nation; these are, the knowledge of God, and of ourselves. Yes, the Divine character and the human heart may be both traced in the past, the present, and the future of the Jew.

Prayer: Thank you Lord for the life, ministry and gifts of Horatius Bonar, and the way he expressed in hymns and sermons the worship and devotion of a generation gone by. The words he wrote and the thoughts he expressed resonate with us, especially as regards his love and concern for your people Israel. Just as he saw Yeshua as the Messiah of Israel and longed for the Church to be a means of reconciliation between Israel and Yeshua, help us to take further his work of giving a loving and true account of the relationship between Israel, her Messiah, and the nations united and reconciled in the his love. In Yeshua’s name we pray. Amen

horatius-bonar1

Let us speak reverently of the Jew. Let us not misjudge him by present appearances. He is not what he once was, nor what he yet shall be.

Let us speak reverently of the Jew. We have much cause to do so. What, though all Christendom, both of the East and West, has for nearly eighteen centuries treated him as the offscouring of the race? What though Mohammad has taught his followers to revile and persecute the sons of Abraham? . . .

Nay, what though he [the Jew] may have a grasping hand, and a soul shut up against the world,–a world that has done nothing but wrong and revile him? What though he may inherit the crookedness of his father Jacob, instead of the nobility of Abraham, or the simply gentleness of Isaac?

Still let us speak reverently of the Jew,–if not for what he is, at least for what he was, and what he shall be, when the Redeemer shall come to Zion and turn away ungodliness from Jacob [Isa. 59:20; see. Rom. 11:26].

In him we see the development of God’s great purpose as to the woman’s seed, the representative of a long line of kings and prophets, the kinsmen of Him who is the Word made flesh. It was a Jew who sat on one of the most exalted thrones on earth; it is a Jew who sits upon the throne of heaven. It was a Jew who wrought such miracles once on our earth, who spoke such gracious words. It was a Jew who said, “Come unto me and I will give you rest;” and a Jew who said, “Behold I come quickly, and my reward is with me.” It was Jewish blood that was shed on Calvary; it was a Jew who bore our sins in His own body on the tree. It was a Jew who died, and was buried, and rose again. It is a Jew who liveth to intercede for us, who is to come in glory and majesty as earthly judge and monarch. It is a Jew who is our Prophet, our Priest, our King.

Let us, then, speak reverently of the Jew, whatever his present degradation may be. Just as we tread reverently the level platform of Moriah, where once stood the holy house where Jehovah was worshipped; so let us tread the ground where they dwell whose are the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and of whom, concerning the flesh, Christ came. That temple hill is not what it was. The beautiful house is gone, and not one stone is left upon another. The
seventeen sieges of Jerusalem, like so many storms rolling the waves of every sea over it, have left few memorials of the old magnificence. The Mosque of the Moslems covers the spot of the altar of burnt-offering; the foot of the Moslem defiles the sacred courts . . . But still the ground is felt to be sacred; the bare rock on which you tread is not common rock; the massive stones built here and there into the wall are witnesses of other days; and the whole scene gathers round it such associations as, in spite of the rubbish, and desolation, and ruin, and pollution, fill you irresistibly with awe . . .

So it is with the Jew,—I mean the whole Jewish nation. There are indelible memories connected with them, which will ever, to anyone who believes in the Bible, prevent them from being contemned; nay, will cast around them a nobility and a dignity which no other nation has possessed or can attain to. To Him in whose purposes they occupy so large a space, they are still “beloved for their fathers’ sake” [Rom. 11:28]. Of them, as concerning the flesh, Christ came, who is over all, God blessed forever.

Later Bonar boldly confessed:

I am one of those who believe in Israel’s restoration and conversion; who receive it as a future certainty, that all Israel shall be gathered, and that all Israel shall be saved. As I believe in Israel’s present degradation, so do I believe in Israel’s coming glory and preeminence. I believe that God’s purpose regarding our world can only be understood by understanding God’s purpose as to Israel. I believe that all human calculations as to the earth’s future, whether political or scientific, or philosophical or religious, must be failures, if not taking for their data or basis God’s great purpose regarding the latter-day standing of Israel. I believe that it is not possible to enter God’s mind regarding the destiny of man, without taking as our key or our guide His mind regarding the ancient nation—that nation whose history, so far from being ended, or nearly ended, is only about to begin. And if any one may superciliously ask, What can the Jews have to do with the world’s history?–may we not correctly philosophize on that coming history, and take the bearing of the world’s course, leaving Israel out of the consideration altogether? We say, nay; but O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Art thou the framer of the earth’s strange annals, either past or future? Art thou the creator of those events which make up these annals, or the producer of those latent springs or seeds of which these arise?

He only to whom the future belongs can reveal it. He only can announce the principles on which that future is to be developed. And if He set Israel as the great nation of the future, and Jerusalem as the great metropolis of earth, who are we, that, with our philosophy of science, we should set aside the divine arrangements, and substitute for them a theory of man? . . .

I believe that the sons of Abraham are to re-inherit Palestine, and that the forfeited fertility will yet return to that land; that the wilderness and the solitary places shall be glad for them, and the desert will rejoice and blossom as the rose. I believe that, meanwhile, Israel shall not only be wanderers, but that everywhere only a remnant, a small remnant, shall be saved; and that it is for the gathering in of this remnant that our missionaries go forth. I believe that these times of ours (as also all the times of the four monarchies [Dan 2]) are the times of the Gentiles; and that Jerusalem and Israel shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, till the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. I believe that, with the filling up of these times of the Gentile pre-eminence, and the completion of what the apostle calls the fullness of the Gentiles, will be the signal for the judgments which are to usher in the crisis of earth’s history, and the deliverance of Israel, and the long-expected kingdom.

How Jewish history shall once more emerge into its old place of grandeur and miracle, and how it shall unwind from itself the bright future of all nations, I know not. But so it is fore-written, “What shall be and miracle, and how it shall unwind from itself the bright future of all nations, I know not. But so it is fore-written, “What shall be the reconciling of them be, but life from the dead?” [Rom 11:15] “Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit” [Isa 27:6].

Israel has been a long time neglected, persecuted, and grievously wronged; let us go, like Jeremiah, and sit down with them amidst their ruins, and in a sympathetic spirit tell them of the Restorer of Israel—the Almighty Repairer of the great breach—the true Antitype of their own Zerubbabel, who can yet build them up “an holy temple, an habitation of God through the Spirit.” While we mourn over their great griefs, their mighty wrongs, and their yet mightier sins, let us gently tell them of “the Man of sorrows,” who is the all-sufficient “consolation of Israel.” We carry God’s own message, prepared by the hand of mercy for the heart of the miserable, and which can, by the blessing of the Holy Spirit, win its way through a mountain of stone and a heart of adamantine [stubbornly resolute] hardness. Go, Christian, to thy wandering and fugitive brother, tell him of Blood “which speaketh better things than that of Abe” [Heb. 12:24]—Blood which can cleanse even those who have “gone in the way of Cain” [Jude 11]. Go, in the spirit of Paul, “with our hearts desire and prayer to God, that Israel may be saved” [Rom. 10:1]. Go, “praying in the Holy Spirit” [Jude 20]; and you will give no heed to those who say that “it is of no use preaching the gospel to the Jew.

H.Bonar, “The Jew,” The Quarterly Journal of Prophecy (July 1870):209-11

I ask you, do you actually think God has merged the Church with Israel making in the sense that these people of the anti-judaic persuasion would want you to believe? Yes, Paul has stated in Ephesians: 14. For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, 15. having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, 16. and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross there by putting to death the enmity. 17. and He came and preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near. 18. For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father. This distinctly speaks of the Mosaic Law, not God’s covenantal promises He’s made with the Jews, which includes Eretz Yisrael. My friend, God is not finished with Israel on an individual basis. I pray that God will open your eyes from this blindness that has infected your vision.

http://bunyanministries.org/books/israel_and_millennialism/19_app_i_the_jew_bonar.pdf

Horatius Bonar, “The Responsibilities Of Christians As Regards The Jews,” The Quarterly Journal of

Prophecy, October, 1855, pp. 347-352.

http://bunyanministries.org/books/israel_and_millennialism/11%20Israel_in_need_of_prodigal_son%27s_love.pdf

http://www.christianfocus.com/item/show/882/-

http://www.cyberhymnal.org/bio/b/o/n/bonar_h.htm

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wZ24AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA324&lpg=PA324&dq=horatius+bonar+jewish+evangelism&source=bl&ots=Zaqu4jEGB2&sig=Q7QNz7Mn24Xw2PfPvT72MFxlHLA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=nuiSVM2KA5GQ7Aby1IGADw&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=horatius%20bonar%20jewish%20evangelism&f=false

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

18 December 1836 Ordination of Ferdinand Christian Ewald #otdimjh

202237-Ewald, Ferdinand cmj

Ferdinand Christian Ewald (September 14th, 1801 –  August 9th, 1874)

From Gidney

Screen Shot 2014-12-18 at 09.53.28

December 18th, 1836, was an important day, when two converts were admitted to the priesthood, the Rev. F. C. Ewald by the Bishop of London, and the Rev. H. S. Joseph, subsequently missionary at Liverpool, by the Bishop of Chester.

Gidney has much to write about Ewald, as does Bernstein, who was discipled and trained by him. Yet Ewald himself was humble and self-effacing. Bernstein writes with splendid double negatives:

It is somewhat difficult to write a memoir of one who was too modest and retiring to say or to write much about himself: and who left but few materials from which to frame a biography, for it was his express wish that no lengthened life should be written. He felt that his record was in Heaven, and that his works would follow him. As he has been at rest for over thirty years, we think that the time has come when an account of his life should be added to that of other labourers in the same field, in which he was by no means the least conspicuous worker.

One does not have to look far to see the influence and effects of Ewald’s life and ministry – more than 50 references in Bernstein, 75 in Gidney, and many mentions of him in other histories. Here is a summary from HaGefen

Ferdinand Ewald was born in 1801, at the village of Maroldsweisach near Bamberg in Bavaria. His parents were poor and could only afford to educate him at the village school. He made such rapid progress with his studies, however, that some friends raised enough money to send him with his brother, Paulus, to a better school where he displayed a special talent for languages.

350px-HsBerge_AltensteinKernburg_2012

Later on he entered the missionary college at Basle and while there became finally convinced of the truth of Christianity and was baptized at the age of 29, taking the additional name of Christian at his baptism.

After further training at Basle he went on to graduate at the University of Erlangen and in 1829 entered the college then maintained by the London Society for Promoting Christianity among the Jews and joined the staff of the Society in 1832. Early in 1832 he revisited Bavaria in order to see his parents and sister and brother in law. Ewald’s sister told him that she already believed Jesus to be the true Messiah and the Saviour of the world. His brother Paulus had already become a Christian and was indeed Lutheran Pastor in Merkendorf in Bavaria.

From there he went to the Barbary States (Algiers, Tunis, Monastir, Susa etc) where he opened a mission and preached, and sold Bibles. He instituted a service on Sunday in Tunis, and was able to hold many discussions with people in the Jewish community, including rabbis. One rabbi was excommunicated for having visited him.

Jüdische_Hochzeit_in_Marokko-1024

In 1835 he visited the Jews along the northern cost of Africa. The Gospel was preached to many thousands and thousands of copies of the Bible were placed in their hands, tens of thousands of tracts circulated.

In 1841, after a short visit to England, he was appointed to assist in the London Society’s Mission in Jerusalem. He and his family joined the party of Michael Solomon Alexander, the first Anglican Bishop to Jerusalem. In his memoirs he tells of this journey, and of his subsequent ministry in the land of Israel. He worked in Jerusalem for ten years, visiting Jews in their workplaces, their hopes and in their synagogues.

One of the most interesting stories Ewald tells has to do with three rabbis who came to faith. They suffered much persecution and hardship even before they stepped out openly in faith. One was unable to withstand the intense pressure, and placed himself back under the authority of the rabbis. Two, however, went on to become strong believers and even entered full time ministry of the Gospel. They were baptised together with two others, Isaac Paul Hirsch and Simon Peter Fraenkel. The Rev. John Nicolayson, the head of the Society’s mission, referring to the event, wrote: “It is not a small thing, that the apparently impenetrable phalanx of rabbinism at Jerusalem has thus actually been broken into; and two Jerusalem rabbis been incorporated into the restored Hebrew Christian church on Mount Zion….”

Ewald witnessed other interesting events at Jerusalem, which had a great bearing upon the subsequent history of the Society; namely, the baptism of John Moses Eppstein, the nephew of one of the rabbis, and the ordination of Tartakover, A.J. Behrens, Sternchuss, Murray Vicars, and Aaron Stern.

59bricklanesundial

On January 16, 1844, tragedy struck the Ewald home and Ferdinand’s wife died at the age of 25, leaving three very young children, one of them just a babe in arms. Ewald was unable to continue his work while caring for his small children, and returned to England where his parents-in-law took on the care of their grandchildren. However, on his remarriage in 1846 he returned with his family to Jerusalem.

In 1851 Ewald’s health failed and he was obliged to leave the land of Israel and return to London. There he became the London Society’s senior missionary, where he served for the next nineteen years. He at once made his way into the hearts and homes of many Jews and in 1853 founded the “Wanderer’s Home” an institution which provided a home for poor enquiring Jews who had been cut off by their families. There can be no doubt that such an institution was needed at the time for within five years of its formation 303 Jews and Jewesses had found a home there and of these 150 were baptized. Ewald claimed that out of a Jewish population of 50,000 in England, some 3,000 were believers. In London alone there were eleven Jewish ministers.

Screen Shot 2014-12-18 at 10.12.01

Ewald died at Gipsy Hill, London, 1874, at the age of 73 years. Above is the memorial to him in Christchurch Spitalfields.

Prayer: Thank you Lord for this distinguished and influential servant, devoted to his Messiah and his people. His character, life and ministry shine through the context of his day and the history of his times. Help us to learn the lessons of your grace and walk in the same humble discipleship. Help us also to recognise the constraints and difficulties of his day – the theological undermining of Jewish expressions of faith in Yeshua, the historic legacy of Christian anti-Judaism, and the cost many Jewish disciples had to pay to be true to their people, their identity and their Messiah. Help us not to blame them for their shortcomings, or see ourselves as superior, but rather, as Ewald did, to work out our calling in the context of the Messiahship of Yeshua and the ongoing election of Israel. In the name of Yeshua, the Hope of Israel, we pray. Amen.

Sources and Works

http://www.ha-gefen.org.il/len/aalphabetic%20presentation/c13763/150351.php

Ewald, F. C. Abodah Zarah, 1856, in German translation

Ewald, F. C. Journal of Missionary Labours in the City of Jerusalem 1842-3-4 and 1846

Bernstein, A. Jewish Witnesses for Christ. 1909. New edition 1999 by Keren Ahvah Meshichit.

Dict. Nat. Biog. Supplement, ii., s.v.J.

Le Roi, Gesch. der Evangelischen Judenmission, i. 279-280; ii. 59-63, 216-217;

Stephens, George – Hebrew Christian Leaders of the 19th Century

Posted in otdimjh | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment